I have a VB.NET singleton class which implements Serializable:
Imports System.IO
Imports System.Runtime.Serialization
<Serializable()> Public Class CoordinateHistory[code].....
My problem is that I can't actually call .Serialize() on the instance of this class, like all of the examples online show. What am I doing wrong?
Question: I must get the content of all sessions in a HttpModule, under .NET 1.1. (don't ask my why certain people still use it) I can write the module, I can get the sessions. But... sessions are stored as
[Code]...
CustomLineCap does not have the SerializableAttribute applied to it. I want to add a property of this type to an object graph that is currently being serialized/deserialized with a BinaryFormatter. I tried switching to XML serialization but it has a bunch of extra requirements and I don't want to fool with that esp. since it's not my code; it's some open source I downloaded. If there's a way to get BinaryFormatter to ignore the property, that might work. I'd rather subclass it; I just don't know if that will work either.
View 1 RepliesI have a class called Truck and a form called frmTruck I have some code like this in a method. It recieves obj as Truck
Dim ms As New MemoryStream(1000)
Dim bf As New BinaryFormatter(Nothing, New StreamingContext(StreamingContextStates.Clone))
bf.Serialize(ms, obj)
To simplify my code, I have basically something like this for frmTruck:
public class frmTruck
private truckValue as Truck
public sub DoSomething()
[code]....
During the LoadTruckFromDatabase function I call the SerializeTruck method, here everything goes fine. But when I call the SerializeTruck just before End sub of DoSomething, it goes wrong I get an exception saying that frmTruck is not serializable My truckinstance doesn't have any references to frmTruck...
If a class is serialized and has events fired from it that are handled on a form you get the error "Form1 cannot be serialized" in c# you can use (to work around this):
[Code]....
When an instantiated class calls a method in the parent form class, VB.NET starts a new instance of the form class instead of calling the method on to the active one.How do I tell it that I have just one instance of my form class, or that I don't want to create a new instance of the form and just call the method on the already active form?
View 2 RepliesI have a class that is serializable. I would like to compute the MD5 of it. I already had a function in the project to get a MD5 from a Stream, so I reused it, and created a function to convert an object to a memorystream. The code is as follows. Does anyone see any problems, but more to the point, is there an easier way to do this that I'm simply missing?
[Code]...
I have a class that contains a list of properties which serializes just fine. However I need one of those properties to contain a collection of another class to give me sub classes
Example XML
<VideoOptions>
<property1>value1</property1>
[code].....
Reading about singletons classes/pattern gave me a pretty good idea for its use. But would it be a good practice to store user related variables in properties of a thread safe singleton class so i can access them by chaining?
Example
When a user logs in several variables will be assigned to a session variable like:
Session("UserID") = reader("UserID")
Session("AccessLevels") = reader("Accesslevels")
Session("UserName") = reader("UserName")
...
Now when working on my webapplication i could always access these values by calling the session() variable, but the chance to forget the session keys or erroneous write them down is significantly. So again would it be good to store these session variables in readonly properties of singleton class so I can access them like:
MySingleton.ID
MySingleton.Accesslevels
MySingleton.UserName
I have a serializable class and structure I created for an ArrayList to be access within a Web Application. The problem I am having is the count comes back as zero after calling New. I debugged the code and the Arrylist is being populated
View 3 RepliesToSerializable is it possible instead of marking a Class with the <Serializable()> attribute?
as in the following Class.So you could maybe do:>>myObject.ToSerializable
<Serializable()> _Public Class ExampleClass
End Class
I have the following architecture for my project:UI -> Web Server -> App Server -> Database
I am using SOA architecture for my project. My Web Service is residing on AppServer having BL (Business Layer) / BO (Business Object) / DAL (Data Access Layer). I am exposing the BL using Web Service. I am getting the service reference to this Web Service at WebServer by creating the proxy using WSDL.exe. Now my question is:
[Code]...
EDIT: SI have a web service which uses a class of functions in order to return data used in various business processes (via InfoPath). One of the functions takes a given SQLCommand object and executes it into a SQLDataReader. Now depending on the SQL command text used this may return one or many rows of one or many columns. So what is the best class for this function to return bearing in mind it needs to be serialized by the web service.
My existing code is:
Dim array As New ArrayList
Try
[code].....
Implement singleton in a parent class.Infact what I want is that All the childs etc. should use same instance of the parent.
I have implemented singleton, Changed the scope of parent class's constructor to "Protected". But in the application when ever the new child's constructor is called i.e. "Dim abc as New Ch1()" the constructor of Parent is called (as it is Proctected and can be access from child).
implement singleton in a parent class. Infact what I want is that All the childs etc. should use same instance of the parent.
I have implemented singleton, Changed the scope of parent class's constructor to "Protected". But in the application when ever the new child's constructor is called i.e. "Dim abc as New Ch1()" the constructor of Parent is called (as it is Proctected and can be access from child). Which is undesired behaviour.
How can i make one item in my class not serialize?
I have tried adding:
<System.ComponentModel.DesignerSerializationVisibility(System.ComponentModel.DesignerSerializationVisibility.Hidden)> with no avail
I would like to understand the Pro & Cons in using the commonly used methods via Singleton class against Shared (Static) members of a class in VB.Net. It could be in terms Time, Space complexity or best practices. I have a BankAccount class with methods doing some business logic.
GetBalance()
GetLast5Credits()
GetMiniStatement()
[code].....
I need to look at the properties of an object and I cannot instantiate this object in the proper state on my dev machine. I need my client to run some code on her machine, serialize the object in question to disk and then I can analyze the file.[code]...
View 2 Replieswhat is the fastest way to serialize and compress a class?
what are the consideration to be made when a long list of objects(classes) have to be serialized and compressed one after the other?
I have an XML file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<MyProducts>
<Product Name="P1" />
[code].....
I'm trying to serialize this class:
<System.Serializable()> Public Class Person
Private _FirstName As String
Public Property FirstName() As String
[code]....
I am trying to figure out a class/struture to handle the following JSON format:
{
"ReturnData": [
{
"id": "msg2DoesNotExistName",
[Code]......
I may or may not have Data for ReturnData and SetValue (one or both at a minimum). I am trying to let the serializer handle most of the formatting without having to check for empty sections and single-item arrays.
how can i serialize a class containing a public event + withevents child classes each containing a public event?
View 3 RepliesI am trying to serialize a class that contains a generic list, and I am finding it all works with the exception of the generic list property. That is to say the other properties are serialized fine and no error is produced.
I have in the past serialized an arraylist - but I thought it was possible to do a generic list in the same way.
Am I missing something or is it not possible to serialize/deserialize a generic list - I have read mixed comments on this..
The relevant parts of the class that gets serialized is defined as..
<XmlInclude(GetType(cConfigUser)), _
Serializable(), XmlRoot(ElementName:="Config")> _
Public Class cConfig
[Code].....
I want to Serialize and Deserialize a configuration class containing a Dictionary to a XML file.Here is an exemple of what the class look like.
Imports
Public
Class
[code]....
When I try to serialize it with a XmlSerializer I get an exception saying to me that it is impossible to serialise Configuration.Parametres because it implements IDictionary.
DateTime
)
Configuration
System.Collections.Generic
I have a issue in a serialization process. I'm trying to Serialize a part of a bigger class.
I've a Class named MyBigClass with contain many property and method, and some of them may not be Serializable.
And I'm trying to Serialize one property of the MyBigClass class, witch is a SortedList named SubClassXList defined as SortedList(Int32, ClassX)
My problem is when it is time to serialize the SortedList (SubClassXList) a error tell me that a Class (say Class B) could not be Serialized because it is not marked as "Serializable", but the Class B in question have nothing to do with the SubClassXList in question.
The only thing I could see, is that the Serialization method try to also Serialize the Main Class (MyBigClass).
Here is the method that I use to Clone a Object ClassX do have the attribute "Serializable()"
Public Function CloneObject(ByVal pObjectToSerialize As Object) As Object
' Create a memory stream and a formatter.
Dim ms As New IO.MemoryStream()
[Code].....
I need to be able to serialize a class into a string, and I know of 2 patterns:
1) (normal) Serialization pattern
2) Proxy Serialization pattern
I've read [URL] (the only website in google that talks about the proxy-serialization pattern) and still cant find the advantage or benefit of using this pattern. Could someone explain what exactly is the proxy serialization pattern, or rather exactly what problem does the proxy-serialization pattern solves that the normal-serialization pattern doesn't solve?
I'm trying to serialize the main class in my VB solution. I've added the Serializable attribute at the top of my class like so:
[code]...
I'm guessing this is because you can't serialize the form that is attached to the class or something, but I really don't know what I'm doing. Can I serialize all of the objects contained in my Form1 class somehow, without getting this error? I don't want to store any data about the form controls, I just need to save all the objects that I've defined at the top of the Form1 class.
How best to manage multiple dat files for serializable objects of the same class. If one of my data files goes past a particular size, I want to create a new file. I then loop through both files when I do processing. Is there any easier way to do this and what's the best size to do this at in terms of performance?
View 1 RepliesI want to created a nested class that can only be visible to and instantiated from the parent class.But I also want to be able to use an instance of the nested class through a public variable of the parent class.I tried making the nested class private, or making the nested class' constructor private, but it won't compile.Is it possible to do this in .NET?
[Code]...