I read somewhere that interfaces can have member variables.Static final constants only, can use them without qualification in classes that implement the interface. On the other paw, these unqualified names pollute the namespace. You can use them and it is not obvious where they are coming from since the qualification is optional.
View 3 Repliesin VB.NET you implement an interface like this...
Sub SomeInterfaceMember()
Implements ISomeInterface.SomeInterfaceMember
End Sub
while in C# you do it explicitly like this (which can only be called via the interface)...
void ISomeInterface.SomeInterfaceMember(){}
or more simply, implicitly like this...void SomeInterfaceMember(){} // Note the name matches the interface member However, regarding VB, I can also do this...
Sub SomeRandomMemberName()
Implements ISomeInterface.SomeInterfaceMember
End Sub
In other words, the method that handles the implementation can have a completely different name than the interface's member name.I'm just wondering if there's something similar to this in C#. (Yes, I know I can simply do an explicit interface, then access it via another 'wrapper' member with a different name that simply delegates to it, but in VB.NET?
I have an Interface defined like this:
Public Interface ISegment
''' <value>
''' The offset where the span begins
'''</value>
[code]....
The problem is that when I try to use the interface in another class, it tells me that Offset and Length are not members of ISegment. Clearly they are. Here is the code that uses the interface
Public Sub UpdateSegmentListOnDocumentChange(Of ISegment)(ByVal list As List(Of ISegment), ByVal e As DocumentEventArgs) Implements IDocument.UpdateSegmentListOnDocumentChange
[code]....
Okay this is a bit of a noobish question, but I ran across this today and it somewhat puzzles me WHY it would be this way.
Consider the following structure
Public Class Employee
Implements IPerson
Private _MyManager As Manager
[Code].....
Here is my question: I am wanting to have every person implement the IPerson interface, whether they are an employee, boss, or manager. However, they each have an attribute that refers to their leader (employees have a manager, managers have a boss, etc). Each implementation of their leader could be potentially differnt other than they fact that they implement the IAuthorityFigure interface. I am wanting to have the IPerson interface have a property for the IAuthorityFigure, but it throws a compiler error for me when I implement this b/c the IAuthorityFigure is not the same type as Boss or Manager (even though they implement the interface).
I'm building a litle console app that involves a control hierarchy -- there are screens, and inside of screens you can compose controls together.
You can add controls to a screen by declaring member variables (which all inherit from AresControl). The control constructor takes a simple coordinate pair. It looks like this:
Public Class IntroScreen : Inherits AresScreen
'Controls
Private LabelSelect As New LabelControl(72, 0)
[Code]....
This would result in cleaner, convention-based code. But try as I might, I can't get it to work - I can walk the member variables of a type, but I need to walk the member variables of a live object.
I am generally not one to engage in subjective arguments over matters like variable naming, code formatting, etc. So I have no intention of starting an argument here.I just came across this (old) blog post which recommends not prefixing member variable names:
[Code]...
I get it: member variables can be lower camelCase, and public properties/methods can be PascalCase. But VB.NET is case-insensitive, so you can't really give a private member the same name as a public property except with a lower case first letter.I've generally prefixed member variables with an underscore, but I've been told that's not idiomatic.
So really I'm just curious: how do you name your member variables in VB.NET? And is there a "standard" way?
I'm not asking because I believe there's a "right" way or because I particularly want to change my style, and certainly not because I have any desire to tell others they're "wrong." Like I said, I'm just curious.
How should I handle events in this situation I have "Class1" with a "PropertyHasChanged" event.In "Class2" I've declare a Public Member Variable WithEvents of Type Class1.As well, Class2 has the Event "OtherPropertyHasChange".In a Form Class I've declare a Public Member Variable WithEvents of Type Class2.The Form Member has access to the "OtherPropertyChange" Event but not the "PropertyHasChanged" Event.Question is,how do I accesss the Events of Class1 from the Form Class?
View 6 RepliesHow should class member variables be used in combination with class methods?Let's say I have a class 'C' with a member variable 'someData'.I call C.getData(), which does not return a value but instead puts data in C.someData. The class that instantiated 'C' first calls C.getData and then uses the data by accessing the member variable C.someData.I call C.getData() in the class that instantiated 'C' which is a function that returns data.I myself prefer the second way. But it also depends on the situation and it's a small difference. Is it 'bad' to have class methods that depend on the classes internal state? What are the best conventions?
View 2 RepliesI have a public interface. i have class that implements the interface, how do i make the implementation of interface members internal or private in the implementation class? If i declare an interface internal, how to implement that in an public class?
View 2 RepliesI have created a class called 'MyAddress' and in the form load event i am adding few objects of that class to the combobox. I want to know how should i set and read the values of the member variables of that selected item of the combobox. I have tried this and is working, but i am not sure whether it is the way to do
vb
Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
[code].....
I am currently making a server monitoring application that pings the server to check its uplink, so far it creates all the picture boxes and labels for each server, and then pings the server, although I have a picture that I want to change dependant on the result.
Below is the code I am currently using, the problem occurs with the objectname variable which allows dynamic coding, where i get a error, saying that "Public member 'image' on type 'String' not found".
Private Sub Ping()
Dim i As Integer
Dim objectName As System.Object
For i = 1 To count - 1
[code].....
how do I overcome it? I have created a class and compiled into .dll This code
[Code]...
In Visual Studio 2008, if I do this:
[Code]....
Does anyone here know how to get the above to work WITHOUT warnings being generated?
In the following code i get a warning at line 59:Warning 1: Access of shared member, constant member, enum member or nested type through an instance; qualifying expression will not be evaluated.and.. At line 78 I get this Warning:
Warning 2 Property 'SelectedCustomer' doesn't return a value on all code paths. A null reference exception could occur at run time when the result is used.
The program compiles and runs well, but i cant' undesrtand the reason for these warnings. Any Idea ?
1: Public Class Form1
2:
3: 'Form level members
4: Private objCustomers As New ArrayList
[code]....
Cannot appear to be able to get this function to not have the above error.Private Function GetIncidentActions(ByVal FromAgentID As Integer, ByVal ToAgentID As Integer, ByVal incidentAction As Integer, ByVal ActionDate As Date) As String
[Code]...
I would like to create an interface that brings with it it's own private variables and regions.for example, if you create a class and implement IDisposable, you get all of the following:[code]
View 3 RepliesI've got 3 forms that have exactly the same functions, so I decided to create an interface.
public Interface IExample
public sub Add()
Public sub Edit()
[code]....
At this point, objfrmExample is now instantiated, even though I've not done a "objfrmExpample = new [what-goes-here?] " and I'm curious as to why.I could possibly guess that because you cannot instantiate an interface variable, then vb.net automatically creates an instance. But thats just a guess. The question is , what is meant by declaring a variable of type Interface, and how does it work?
I'm "cloning" objects in my code. For instance: objClone = objOriginal My question is: Does the assignment operator in VB.NET 1.1 do a member-by-member copy of the objOriginal to objClone or does objClone simply point as a reference to memory referenced by objOriginal?
View 3 Repliesi changed a class variable to shared so i can access it in all instances of the class, but it caused an error. what is causing this, and how can i fix it?
Private
Shared img As Bitmap
Me
.img = bgImage
I have 2 tables Table A & Table B Table A has the table values that I want to be populated in a datagridview control.The challenge is that column 1 in table A contains an ID(foreign key) to a name field that is a located in table B. I need the datagrid to have the first column be a combobox that displays the names(from Table B) that are already in table A via the ID's, but reference the populating values from Table B. So that when you bring down the combobox you would be choosing from Table B data but populating table A with the ID and you would see a name there instead of an ID.[code] How do I populate my DS dataset with Table B? And how can I create a link to these two tables using a bound datagridview control?
View 1 RepliesI get this error if I follow these steps: Change property Y of an object (an associated entity property)
Attempt to submit changes At this point the value of Y and the value of X (the underlying key) are not in agreement -- LINQ to SQL apparently doesn't synchronize these until GetChangeSet is called.An expected error occurs due to some business logic or database level constraint during the update operation.At this point the value of Y is in agreement with X because GetChangeSet was called.Change the value of Y to Nothing (aka null).Call GetChangeSet.
The error occurs on the last step because the value of X and the original value of X (returned by GetOriginalEntityState) are different, and the new value does not agree with Y? Is that why? Is this a bug in LINQ to SQL. Must be because I don't see the same behavior if I change Y to another (non-null) value instead during step 5. What's the right way around this? I can see a few ways:
Discard the DataContext when an error occurs and leave the UI as-is. I don't like this because then optimistic cocurrency change conflicts cannot be detected. The new context doesn't have the original values in it that were populated at the same time the UI was populated, so if the UI has any stale values in it, they will cause data in the database to revert.Refresh the datacontext (OverwriteCurrent) and leave the UI as-is. I don't like this for the same reason as #1.Refresh the datacontext (OverwriteCurrent) and re-populate the UI. I don't like this because then the error message just presented to the user does not show the user the error they made and allow them to correct it. It also discards all the other changes the user may have made.When the error occurs, explicitly retrieve the key for Y that corresponds to the original value of X and reset Y, then call GetChangeSet to re-synchronize X (X is read-only or private so I can't reset it directly). This seems to work, but seems like a hack, and may require lots of code for other similar errors.
I know I have done this before and as I remember it should be really easy. But for some strange reason I can't do it now and I am about to jump off the building.I will make it simple:Two tables, one is just a list of products and their code.The other table: "details" has a field named product. I want to store only the code there.In the second table's entry form, I am putting a combobox. This combo box should display the list of products, their names, but depending on which one is selected, the code is what is passed to the table "details". Currently If I set the display member to product and the value member to code it still pases the product to the binded data source.
View 3 RepliesI have a database that holds information about a particular job. One of those things is a customerID. CustomerID links to another table containing customer details. I have a combo box attached to a custom object that holds customerID as the valuemember and CustomerName as the displaymember.The JobDetails holds the customerID info. How do I set the default selection in the combobox based on the ValueMember of the combo box?
View 2 RepliesLast year (2010) I came across a FANTASTIC command that allowed me to take a string of variables with a common delimiter and break it all back out into separate variables (possibly an array) with one statement.
[Code]...
As long as the delimiter was a unique specifiable character, this one-statement command could break it out into elements. my memory and point me in the right direction.
I have code, shown below, that works all except for 1 thing: The variables being passed byRef get passed, but once modified in the else section of the "if me.invokerequired" code of RecordData, the variables are never updated in the calling function. To reiterate, the calling function does not receive the updated data that is in the variables custid and amt.When debugging, I see the data change in the else section of "if me.invokerequired", but once it returns from the callback the data is missing.[code]
View 15 RepliesI define some global variables of a class as follows:
Private Class MyClass
Private var1 as Decimal
Private list1 as List(Of string)[code].....
But I found that after this form is closed, all above variables, var1, list1, list2 still exist in memory. I thought they should be collected by gc since the form is already disposed as I confirmed.
Add: I have monitored half an hour after the form is closed. But these variables are not collected by gc. I have an automatic update procedure on the form which uses above variables.Since the above variables still hold values, the automatic update procedure is always called which causes exception. (One quick fix is to check if form.isDisposed in update procedure. But I do not think this is elegeant. Besides, these variables occupy memory.)
Does the memory used in declaring variables are reclaimed by the OS when these variables go out of scope?Does the memory used be released by setting thier value to nothing? if not, then how can I force the garbage collector to run or excecute at a certain/desired time..How about in Windows Forms..How can we make sure that the memory used in initializing and showing forms be released if those forms were closed?
View 13 RepliesQuestion 1: What is the difference between "Background Worker" and "Worker Pool" as indicated within the MSDN samples provided.
Question 2: I noticed while using, AddressOf _Function_, variables cannot be passed; what would be an efficient solution to this?
Question 3: While using multithreading is it required to invoke before setting variables, or only form properties?
Question 4: While using System.Net.Sockets is it safe/efficient to use Application.DoEvents while waiting for new data; or would be using a Do While loop be fine without DoEvents since the action would be multithreaded? Note: there can be up to 2000-3000 sockets in use at a time.
I'm new in .NET programming.I have a class Form1 that includes Button1_Click event.Button1_Click creates a multiple Text Boxies at run time)Here is the class:
Public Class Form1
Dim shiftDown As Integer
Dim counter As Integer
[code].....
how to create a user interface in a game such as the application XFire using Visual Basic?
View 3 Replies