VS 2010 Threading - Add A 1 Second Delay Between Calls?
Jul 31, 2011
to some server via an UdpClient. However, I need to make sure that all commands send are separated by a 1 second delay. If there is no delay, two commands send within this 1 second timespan will not be received both; only the first or the second command will get through.he commands are sent in a background thread at the moment, because it might take some time before the command is sent. I keep looping until the command has been sent, like this:
vb.net
Public Sub Send(command As String)
Dim bytes = Me.GetCommandBytes(command)
I'm on my way to MSDN but thought I'd stop by here first because the answers are usually more cogent.I have a test bed that mimmicks my product app. The general architecture is a factory that builds/instantiates a number of objects (device controllers) that are scalable in number based on requirement. Each object has a threaded portion that reads a device. This way, each object can read its own device simultaneously with all the others. To perform the read, the object calls a routine in a Module that houses the device interfaces. Interestingly (and happily), it seems like each thread has its own copy of the Module routine.
The test bed seems to verify what I'm seeing in the app. In the testbed, a 500 mil second delay is substituted for the device call. Even enclosing the test module portion that hosts the delay in a Synclock results in multi-threaded execution of the pseudo device call. I haven't tested for data yet, but this seems to indicate that when the module routine is called from controller object, it too carries it's own copy of the data just like the calling object. As a long time c++ programmer...that don't quite seem right.
I've been trying to use "System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(15)" as the delay code but if freeze the form. I used this "Location.Refresh()" where location is the name of the form, but it didn't give me what I need. This code is going to work on a ProgressBar while typing and the value of the progress bar change while typing. The progress bar jumps to the new value and I want it to move. So I thought about puting it in a "For ... Loop" but the whole form freezes.
I have 5 Picture Boxes, each picture box has an image but all 5 of them has a visibility of false. I have a button, when clicked will show 5 of the images. But showing the 5 images with a delay. So it's going to be
What the Win32 API is? I have looked around but no where really outlines what it is. Is it basically a set of procedures, outlined by Microsoft for programmers in order to get services from the operating system? In essence is it the equivalent to making system calls abd and library calls in UNIX? And yes I now Windows makes library calls too.
I know that time delays have been covered before around almost everywhere. however a method that forgoes forcing the GUI to become temporarily non-responsive, is all but a myth, or at least to my findings. i have the need for a GUI program to delay before the next command, however using the current method, detailed following, it causes the desired effect however it dose make it much less polished as when you click anything else on the GUI it goes un-responsive for the directed time. [Code] make a sub called say Tdelay( milseconds as integer) and have it run a loop as many times as the milseconds variable indicates and each time making the thread delay for 1 milsecond and then update the GUI/form in some way, then re-loop.
I have been using DBTransaction for my current projects that access a single database. However, I read some documentation on TransactionScope and was wondering in which scenario would using TransactionScope be better? Or should I be replacing DbTransaction calls with calls to TransactionScope?
i recently upgraded from vs2k8 to vs2k10 and after loading up some of my programs i couldntbut notice the error window saying "A call to PInvoke function bla bla has unbalanced the stack. bla bla bla..."This is very annoying since the exact same code worked perfectly in vs2008 and theres no apparent reason for their sudden failiure, i tried different kinds of calling conventions but i get the same error on each turn. The error message only seems to appear upon callingg
I am writing a project for class and have come across a problem that I have been unable to solve and am loking for a little help. What I am trying to do is to implement a half second delay every time a flipper is flipped or reset. My example code of The flip and reset is below.
' Flipper 1 code If Flipper1.droppedLeft = False Then Flipper1.flip()
Due to use postmessage tow times, I want add a delay (50) between tow postmessage(), and my timer interval is 1000.
Private Sub Timer2_Tick(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Timer2.Tick If CheckBox10.CheckState = CheckState.Checked Then st = Int(Val(TextBox17.Text) * 10)
[code]....
and I konw Thread.Sleep(50) is not good, but how to use timer stop here.
In my program I have a tab control with 4 tab pages. In the second tab page there is a lot of controls (about 50! includes buttons, labels, combo boxes, textboxes, option boxes). When user opens the program and want to navigate to tabpage 2 there is about 2-3 second delay showing tabpage. This problem only occur the first time, after that it just shows the page fine. I am not sure what is causing this lag but the program seems buggy and slow to user.
Is there a way to delay the start of a text file? I am using this to call the TXT file after clicking a button: (opens txt file)
Process.Start("text.txt")I was wondering if there was a command to delay the TXT file from opening for a number of seconds?I use this to delay the Splash Screen: (delayed 5 seconds)
Threading.Thread.Sleep(5000)Is there something similar for TXT files??
I am making a simulation of windows loading,Ive made it show the startup screen (startup.vb) and ive got the login screen (login.vb), how can I make it stay at the startup screen for a few seconds before using the startup.show() command.( if I can use that command?)
In our VB6 applications, we added a few utility functions for tracking the amount of time spent in a function. We did this to track performance bottlenecks. Basically, how it worked was there were two utility functions: StartTickCount() and EndTickCount().
You would pass the name of the function in each, and the functions would use a dictionary to get the tick count when StartTickCount() was called, and then subtract the tick count when EndTickCount() was called. This wasn't perfect because it didn't of course take into consideration that calls to get tick count takes time, etc, but basically it worked for our purposes. How to make sure to call StartTickCount() at the beginning of each function and EndTickCount() at each exit point:
Private Function SomeFuction() as String ' indicate the function started StartTickCount("MyClass.SomeFunction") ' some logic that causes the function to end [Code] .....
Anyway, is there any functionality built in, either through the VS 2010 debugger or in the System.Reflection namespace, to do something similar in VB.NET? Basically, what I want is to log the number of times each function is called, the total amount to time spent in that function, the average number of seconds spent in that function, and the maximum amount of time spent in a single call in that function.
I am currently in the process of writing a demonstrative program that will generate a string of 9 random numbers in a textbox. Now my basic knowledge of VB 2010 allows me to do this but my goal is to delay the generation of this number sequence until the my progress bar has progressed to the end. How can I insert a delay after my button activates my progress bar/timer without stopping all function and usability of the program all together. The basic wait function seems to lock everything up for the allotted time and then the number instantly generates and the progress bar begins.
I am currently creating a program to send keystokes to a program at certain intervals. I need the thread to delay between keystrokes, and i need to be able to have the user input the amount of delay from the GUI via textbox. I have it running perfect with Thread.Sleep(), but it just isn't consistent enough. How can I code it to be accurate to roughly 5ms up or down? thanks, and here is the code. This is in VB 2010 by the way.
After the 7th line I need a pause until a submit button pops up on the screen. The submit button is hidden until the getelementbyid.focus is run. I cant use webbrowser_documentcompleted because the submit only unhides itself, and I cant use Sleep() because that just stalls the whole block.
I have an app that adds ammount to gether and i am trrying to do some error checking. This is the code i Have so far
CODE:
I would like to turn this into a select case so that it calls all the code need to check before running. I have tried to do it my self but has been ages since i coded and even then it was in VB6. I know there is a way to do the case in a module and then call it into the form where i need it. i have 3 radio buttons that if they are not selected it pops up a message to say so.
I have a problem. I'm creating a new thread, which should do some stuff and update a text box. But, when I test my program, the main (UI) thread is doing all the job, even though I declared and started a new thread.
[Code]...
I even made another thread for testing purposes, but it was the same.
Anyone have any examples, or source code or SDK's that are FREE?I'd like to setup a simple voip program to play with.Was curious whats the simplest way of doing it, using UDP across an IP.I planned on having a server program, as i'd want multiple clients.My question is, how can i stream voice, without using alot of bandwidth with minimal delay between talking?
I've been raking my brain for quite some time on this. Is there any way with VB.NET that I can use multiple IP's in one instance of a program? For example, I want to be able to navigate to a web page 10 times at once, with each one using a different IP. I want them to be parallel (multi-threaded) rather than going sequentially. Going sequentially, I could just do the action, change the IP, do the action, change the IP.
I have a button and when it's clicked a HTTP request is sent out to a website to do a few things, but because its got to load the external resources it makes the interface frozen. I've moved the HTTP onto another thread using the follow
VB.NET Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click Dim Thread1 As New System.Threading.Thread(AddressOf check_accounts)
[Code]...
When i want to update a label that is on my main form (from the check_accounts sub). I know that isn't the right way, but i have no idea what the right way is. All the documentation i can find is very (excuse me for this) nerdy and really doesn't offer much insight on how to incorporate it into a project.
I want to be able to have a numericupdown box that can let the user change the amount of threads they want to use. I assume more threads allow the http requests to be done faster and at the same time?Also if i wanted to pause the HTTP requests, would the best method to use be pausing the thread?
I have an application that performs a lot of busy work. All of the work is performed using a BackgroundWorker and the point of execution is the DoWork Event of the BackgroundWorker.On the UI thread, before the workload begins, I display a PictureBox that contains an animated GIF that illustrates progress; for the most part this works fine and the UI thread is not paused or slowed while the BackgroundWorker does its job. There is however, one instance where the UI thread is impacted by the work being done and it defeats the whole purpose of putting this work in a separate thread. In this application, the user must wait until the work completes before they can move to the next step, so my sole reason for moving this all to a BackgroundWorker was so that I could display a smooth, uninterrupted progress indicator on the UI thread while this work was being done, so that the user could see that something was happening.
The case where the work being done is impacting the UI thread (pausing/delaying the PictureBox animation) deals with a referenced COM object.
[Code]...
All of the COM object event handlers and subsequent functions are appropriately using Delegates, but I am not sure why the ProcessFiles method would cause the UI thread to hang while the work completes; I thought that was the whole purpose of the BackgroundWorker.
I am working on an application that is taking pretty long to execute. I started playing with mutli-threading and it seems to have greatly sped up my app. Problem is that threads are still executing and the rest of the code executes before the threads finish. Here is my
So I am currently attempting to wrap my head around create multi-threaded programs and I am currently running into an issue when using a Shared variable across multiple threads.The program is structured as follows: Public Shared IsActive as Boolean
Main Thread = GUISets the Value of IsActive through a Button ControlTwo Worker ThreadsBoth threads are while loops that read the IsActive Boolean Ex:While IsActive = True Do Work End WhileHowever when I change the value of IsActive from the Main Thread it causes the worker threads to stop (ThreadState = 16).
I have been reading that I have to synchronize/lock shared resources and have tried SyncLock and Monitor methods without success (it is entirely possible I am not using the above correctly, so If someone could provide proper examples for the above situation using the mentioned methods please share them).
I am getting error when I am putting my sendmail function into other thread. But without threading the message was sent successfully. I am getting error in this part when sending using thread. mail.Body = EmailBody.DocumentText It say: Specified cast is not valid. Here is my code for sending email EmailBody is a webbrowser in Desing MOde ON
I'm having some issues with parsing a lot of information into controls using winforms. I've tried adding threads/backgroundworkers, but they don't seem to work properly. To avoid the cross-thread exception, I had to add an invocation checker:If Me.InvokeRequired Then Me.Invoke(New MethodInvoker(AddressOf ParseSub()))This just freezes the form as it would without threading, but without the invoke checker I get cross thread exceptions because information from one thread is trying to be sent to another.
I started a threading project and want to manage my code so that it waits for all the threads to be finished before displaying to the user on the main UI thread that it has completed the task and waiting for the user... I've created a List to manage the threads and a global Boolean, "blnStop"...
