Dim q = From definition In definitionList _ Where definition.ValueDefName.Contains(criteria)[code]....
I have already looked into this answer: LINQ - dynamic WHERE clause?Unfortunately, it doesn't work for me using .net 4.0. When I attempt to pass the criteria string in it ask for a predicate. The end goal is to add any of these:
to be passed into the query depending on what checkboxes the user has selected. How can I create a dynamic where clause in linq to sql? Is there new syntax for passing in a where clause as a string?
I'm currently trying to loop through an array (two values) and use both values in a query inside the loop Right now my code doesn't work. I'm trying to populate dynamically the "appType" parameter within the "SelectParameters" tags of the SQLDataSource, but this won't work.
Forgive my ignorance on this.I have this LINQ Query:Dim ngBikersDataContext As New CarBikeWalkDataContext
bikersList = (From c In ngBikersDataContext.Reg_Bikers _ Order By c.L_Name _ Select New Bikers() With { _ .BikerID = c.BikerID, _ .F_Name = c.F_Name, _
[Code]...
with the error "Overload resolution failed because no accesible 'Select' accepts this number of arguments." Over the "NEW" I get an error " ')'expected."
I have been trying the following but it returns unexpected results:
Dim xd As XDocument = _ <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <root>
[code].....
The above result returns both 'element' nodes however it should only return the first where element/subelement@id=1/subsubelement@id=3 However if results.Ancestors. is used it returns the correct 'subelement' and if that line is not included it returns a single 'subsubelement' whih is also correct I don't understand why when mvoing to the 'element' it returns both (I realise both have a subelement with id=1 but I thought each further query would filter out the presvious results)?
I want to write a query that the "where" in the query is a string something like"
Dim query as string= "Name =xxxx and Date > 10 " Dim t = from book in doc.Descendants("books") Select _ [Name] = book..value, [Date] = book..value.... Where (query)
I have an untyped dataset returned from my WebService. The user wants to dynamically construct a query referencing tables and columns and specifying values to test for.I have looked at Lambda Expressions and the Expressions.Expression Namespace. I think these provide the answer I'm looking for, but I'm not certain how to go about contructing the linq expressions to extract the datarows I'm looking for.
I plan on limiting the result to one datatable that the query will result in and i"ll provide the joins from the user's constructs.For a simple example I have a DataTable with (n) rows called "Table", and in it there is a computed column called "b_IsActive" that has the expression "Convert(IsActive, 'System.Boolean')". The user wants to retrieve all rows in "Table" where field "b_IsActive" is true.
Is there a way to use Meta Tales or Table names to Construct a dynamic query in LINQ?
foreach (var metaTable in db.Mapping.GetTables()) { var queryType = metaTable.RowType.Type;
[code]....
Is there a way to do something like this? The attempt above yields the error:Could not find an implementation of the query pattern for source type 'System.Data.Linq.ITable'. 'Select' not found. Consider explicitly specifying the type of the range variable 'q'.
I'm trying to query old Access database tables and compare them with SQL Server tables.They often don't have primary keys, or they have extra fields that had some purpose in the nineties, etc., or the new tables have new fields, etc.I need to find records - based on a set of fields specified at runtime - that are in one table but not another.So, I do this kind of query all the time in SQL, when I'm comparing data in different tables:
dim fields_i_care_about as string = "field1, field2, field3" 'This kind of thing gets set by a caller, can be any number of fields, depends on the 'table dim s as string= ""
[code]....
It tells me it can't convert a Boolean - Is there any way to do this without Linq expressions? They seem far more complex than what I'm trying to do here, and they take a lot of code, and also I can't seem to find examples of Expressions where we're comparing two fields in a subquery.Is there a simpler way? I know I could do the usual EXISTS query using JOIN or IN - in this case I don't need the query to be super fast or anything. And I don't need to use a DataTable or DataSet - I can put the data in some other kind of object.
I have users check off lab facilities in a UI. I want to use linq to fetch corresponding records for all of the labs that they have checked off. Basically,
Dim myRecs = (From l As EpiData In myDataContext.EPIDatas Where l.facility= _ one of the checked labs
So basically, I need to write a linq query where the "strings" to match are determined at runtime. Is there any way to do this easily? I know that there is a library out there called dynamic LINQ, but (1) it's in C# and I'm writing in VB (2) I'm really just looking for a single, simple solution for this single case.
Pretty new to VB.Net. Having a bit of trouble here with something I though should be simple.Keeping it simple. Let's say i have a Document table with "Name" that I want to search on (in reality there are several other tables, joins, etc ..). I need to be able to build the query where clause based on string values passed in.
Example - user may pass in "ABC" or "ABC DEF" or "ABC DEF GHI".The final query would be (syntax not correct i know)Select * from Documents Where Name Like %ABC% AND Name Like %DEF% AND Name like %GHI%
So, I though I could do something like this.
Dim query = From document In _context.Documents << loop based on number of strings passed in >> query = query.Where( ... what goes here?? )
For some reason, being brain dead or something, I can't figure out how to make this work in VB.Net, or if I'm doing it correctly.
I know that LINQ queries are deferred and only executed when the query is enumerated, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly when that happens.Certainly in a For Each loop, the query would be enumerated.What's the rule of thumb to follow? I don't want to accidentally enumerate over my query twice if it's a huge result.
For example, does System.Linq.Enumerable.First enumerate over the whole query? I ask for performance reasons. I want to pass a LINQ result set to an ASP.NET MVC view, and I also want to pass the First element separately. Enumerating over the results twice would be painful.It would be great to turn on some kind of flag that alerts me each time a LINQ query is enumerated. That way I could catch scenarios when I accidentally enumerate twice.
I am learning how to use database. I am using sql server 2005. I would like to know how to make an sql query to the database from vb.net. I have tried some code. what i would like to know is, how to make the sqldataadapter statement with 2 or more where clause.
I have following code that creates Linq query. I've never used Linq until today and having problem with "Order By Clause"[code..]
If I run the code, I get following error.Name 'p' is either not declared or not in the current scope. How come p!Weight in "Select Clause" works but not in "Order By Clause"?
Let's say I have Plans and Documents Dim myPlans = _context.Plans.Where(predicate1) Dim myDocuments = _context.Documents.Where(predicate2)
I have structured the where clause for each using PredicateBuilder. So, myPlans and myDocuments have a correct SQL statement. What I'd like to do is join these two tables into one linq statement. The problem I'm having is that, by default the AND condition is joining the where clauses.
myPlans Where clause : (p.name like "%test%" AND p.name like "%bed%") OR (p.description like "%test%" AND p.description like "%bed%") myDocuments Where clause : (d.name like "%test%" AND d.name like "%bed%") OR (d.description like "%test%" AND d.description like "%bed%")
When I combine the two the desired result Where clause is: Where (d.ID = p.ID) AND (myplans where clause above) OR (mydocument where clause above). Meaning, I'd like the two where clauses in each of the tables to be "or" instead of "And".
The current result where clause is: Where (d.ID = p.ID) AND (myplans where clause above) AND (mydocument where clause above). Meaning, I'd like the two where clauses in each of the tables to be "or" instead of "And".
I'm forming the statement like this: Dim test = From d in myDocuments _ Join p in MyPlans on d.ID Equals p.ID _ Select d.Name, p.Name
Right now our queries can be driven through the DataTable Select statement. However, utimately we want to end up with more complex queries. We think Linq is the answer, but can't find anyexamples of this.Here is the sysnopsis:I have a dataset containingdatatable(s) of informationI have a datatable containing business rules as strings like:
So I have a query I'm doign where, at the moment, the places to search are set in stone, but the values that maybe be searched for is variable.Right now, I have a drop down menu that allows you to choose a character class. This limits the items to a specific class. Then I can filter on text from a textbox.
However, each item in the list has a source, based on the book it is published in. I want a user to be able to choose several from a checkbox menu, then pass those values for inclusion in the criteria for finding items.
The problem I'm having is finding the most concise way to do dynamic WHERE clauses. There are several examples out there, and even a couple don't seem to want to do exactly what I'm doing, and I'm having trouble determining if it will work for me.
I need to represent the following query using LINQ:
DECLARE @PurchasedInventoryItemID Int = 2 DECLARE @PurchasedInventorySectionID Int = 0 DECLARE @PurchasedInventoryItem_PurchasingCategoryID Int = 3 DECLARE @PurchasedInventorySection_PurchasingCategoryID Int = 0
[code]....
Now, I know that a query in .NET doesnt look like this, this is my test in the SQL Design Studio. Naturally VB.NET variables will be used in place of the SQL local variables.My problem is this: All of the conditions after "WHERE" are optional. In that a query might be made that uses one, some, all, or none of the conditions. V.PropertyID and V.Value can also appear any number of times.In VB.NET I can make this query easy enough by simply concatenating strings, and using a loop to append the "V.PropertyID/V.Value" conditions.I can also make a Stored Procedure in MS SQL, which is easy enough.However, I want to accomplish this using LINQ.
I have an application that does a search of our database (exposed via EF) for records meeting certain conditions. We have two main tables (Jobs and Recipients). Recipients are linked to the Jobs table by a Job ID.The job record has various fields (Process Date, NameJobType). The recipient has a lot of Name and ID fields (e.g. Account Number, Surname, etc)
I have a table DailyTransaction in MsAccess as under: DTDate, DTTime, CustId, Description, Quantity, Price, Amount, AccountNumber, Name I want to extend following query with a Group By clause:I require to display all records in a Listview Group By CustId.Then I require to display all records in a Listview Group By AccountName.e how I can extend following query with Group By clause to achieve the required results
I have an application that does a search of our database (exposed via EF) for records meeting certain conditions. We have two main tables (Jobs and Recipients). Recipients are linked to the Jobs table by a Job ID.The job record has various fields (Process Date, Name, JobType). The recipient has a lot of Name and ID fields (e.g. Account Number, Surname, etc)I want to present a search screen where they see a list of fields to search on. The ASP.net code then sees which textboxes the user typed in (or selected), and builds a query based on that. [code] Where I'm stuck is figuring out how to add in additional where clauses. Should I just use Entity SQL?Can this return strongly typed EF objects as well? And is it possible to return both the Jobs and Recipients objects?
I've written an SQL query with a lot of 'or's in the 'where' clause: i.e. "SELECT * FROM myTable WHERE col1='a' or col1='b' or col1='c'...etc" I'm trying to run a query in access via vb.net, but I keep getting "Query is too complex" error message. I'm guessing I've hit some maximum limit. Anyone know a way around this, other than just to break it down into multiple queries?
Dim groupedData = (From p In pData _ Group By p.TruncParam Into Group) _ .SelectMany(Function(g) g.Group) _ .Select(Function(d, idx) New With { _
[Code]...
When the TruncParam changes, I would like the index (idx) in the Select clause to reset to 1. So, in the list above, the Index should be SOLUB0001, SOLUB0002, INSOL0001, INSOL0002...CLRES0001, SUMCA0001, SUME0001.