In C#, when writing a function that returns an IEnumerble<>, you can use yield return to return a single item of the enumeration and yield break; to signify no remaining items. What is the VB.NET syntax for doing the same thing?
[Code]...
Will Visual Basic in Visual Studio 2010 have the YIELD keyword?If not.... Why?
View 1 RepliesI am creating a gridview and need to gather the data from various functions that return a type of IEnumerable. I've created gridviews using a dataset as a datasource, but how does one use multiple data sources(of IEnumerable) to populate one gridview? Like how do you combine all that into one dataset?
View 1 RepliesNote that I'm aware of other yield in vb.net questions here on SO. I'm playing around with Caliburn lately. Bunch of great stuff there, including co-routines implementation.
Most of the work I'm doing is C# based, but now I'm also creating an architecture guideline for a VB.NET only shop, based on Rob's small MVVM framework.Everything looks very well except using co-routines from VB. Since VB 10 is used, we can try something like Bill McCarthy's suggestion:
[Code]...
It definitely isn't as elegant as C# version, but it looks to be doable. We'll see if there are any problems with this. If anyone has better idea, I'm all ears.
I'm converting some C# code and I'm stuck at this line:c# while (iterator.MoveNext()) yield return iterator.Current;
View 4 RepliesI'm binding a DataGridView to a BindingSource to a LINQ IEnumerable, I found that the BindingSource.Find method throws an exception because .Find isn't implemented in IEnumerable (and the BindingSource just passes the call to it's DataSource). I need to use BindingSource.Find to select/highlight a particular row in the DataGridView.
Is there a feasable way to extend my DataContext to support this behavior w/o breaking anything else? I expected to find the code out there already, but I've searched exaustively with no luck.Without it, I cannot "move" the BindingSource using .Position and that's a pretty common use of the BindingSource I think.
I have a table in a data grid the columns are bound to the columns...
SQFT QTY WIDTH LENGTH
i also have added into the datagrid an unbound column called Yeild%.what i'm trying to do is the following formula
SQFT / (QTY * (width * length / 144) and have the result return the answer in the unbound yield column for that row represented as a percentage
So if SQFT = 178 QTY = 2 Width = 144 Length = 102 answer would be 0.87 (rounded)
so this would be 87%
How to give another function's returned value in LINQ Ienumerable.
Private function GetFruitColor(fruit) as string
'It returns fruit color.
'If valid fruit and color not available, it returns ""(empty string)
[code].....
'Below code is wrong. but please suggest me how to correct it. My intention is, I want output collection(say dictionary) of each fruitname and its color(returned by other function call) for all the fruits which the GetFruitColor is not nothing(it can be empty or valid string).
Dim query = _
fruits.Where(Function(fruit) k= GetFruitColor(fruit) if not k is nothing select fruit, k)
End Sub
I have a MenuStrip control and when I right clicked on it and selected "insert standard items", it created a few functions. There are a few options there that I would like to get working: Cut, Copy, Paste, Delete, and Select All. I presume that for what I want, I'd need to make my own classes for each function. (ie: Cut class, Copy class... etc.)
I would like to be able to do something similar to the example below:
CODE:
Im doing this in Vb.net On Windows 7 .
I have an object called Result<T> that has a constructor which accepts an argument of IEnumerable<T>. I'd like to be able to pass in a datatable if possible.
I tried datatable.AsEnumerable(), but where I bind to the data it was complaining that 'MyProperty' is not a field or property on type 'DataRow' - which makes sense since 'MyProperty' isn't a property on 'DataRow', but it was a column in my datatable.Is there a way to convert a datatable to something that I can pass into the Result object and still have it bind to, say, a gridview?
I tried using the linq Zip method on IEnumerable but it does not work for more than 2 arrays.Here is an example in Python of what I am trying to do(I got p - nested IEnumerable - and need q - another nested IEnumerable):
>>> l=['a','b','c']
>>> m=[1,2,3]
>>> n=['x','y','z'][code].......
I have functions in my program that stop after it reaches a Return line but I need the function to continue in case what I want the function to return changes. Is there a workaround for this or a way to force the function to continue after a return?
I made a Test Program to demonstrate the problem. It is a Form that contains only a button.
Here is the source code:
[Code]...
The messagebox always says "It returned False" when if it continued going through the code like I want it to it would have returned true.
Currently I have been writing subroutines in a activex dll to carry out functions in my main program but I have hit a little snag when trying to return a function when an if statement is triggered. What I want to do is for the dll to check if a function in the my.settings of the main program is true/false and if it turns out that it is true/false in the settings it will trigger the if statement in the dll which will then send data back to the main program - seem simple? I am also wondering, can you transfur boolean settings for enabled textboxes through functions stated in the subroutine of the dll?
View 8 Repliesi have a strange issue today. Sample code is at the below of the post. The code that i have pointed out is too strange. According to my knowledge using return statement the functions return values as byval and copies the value to the stack. Also how can my class can reach outscope elements and change them. Take a look at to the code below. How this could be?
code
Public Class Form1
Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
Dim b As New ByteClass
Dim sumArray As Long = 0
[Code]...
I've just been burned again by the fact that there is no compiler warning when you fail to return a result in a Function that returns a Value type. I wrote the function:
Public Function CompareTo(ByVal other As MessageIndex) As Integer Implements System.IComparable(Of MessageIndex).CompareTo
Me._messageIndex.CompareTo(other._messageIndex)
End Function
which performs the CompareTo Function for two integers, then throws the result away and returns 0, because I forgot to either assign a value to CompareTo, or use Return, and that isn't flagged by the compiler because it's valid VB for a Value type.
I happen never to use "FunctionName = ReturnValue" because it hides information from maintenance programmers and also because I think it's insane .
Is there any way I can get the compiler to issue a warning whenever my Functions are missing a Return, whether it's a Value type or not?
Planning on migrating from 1.1 to 2.0 framework.After doing the automatic vs 2005 migration, it did highlighted lot of lines: due to unused variables and functions with no return type..Is there a tool which can fix those unused variables plus function with no return types.
View 2 RepliesI need to create unit testing project for my current website. The currentw ebsite si written in VB. All unit testing examples are using interface to create mock object. My current VB class does not implment any interface. Can I add interface and implement it to my current class and functions without affecting or changing codes to any pages in my website that call the functions? For examples my current class is like:
[Code]...
In this application I need to allow users to enter a month as integer (1-12) then use integer tryparse to validate that input, that seems to be the easy part. I need two create two functions, one that returns the name of the month and the other returns the number of days in that month. The arrays are supposed to be defined and initialized within the function so that the main program can take the user input and call the two functions, then return the appropriate values as output to labels. I am not sure how to declare the arrays in their appropriate functions and then how to call those functions to retrieve the right value from the function.
View 1 RepliesIn order to return a value from a VB.NET function one can assign a value to the "Functions Name" or use "return value." I sometimes see these inter-mixed in the same function. Personally, I prefer the return. My question is, what is the internal difference, if any, between the two?
View 5 RepliesWhat I am trying to do is have a class where the functions of the same name are both instance functions and shared functions.
Public Shared Function Get...(byval xx as xx)
and
Public Function Get...
The Public Function uses a Property xx created in the constructor, whereas the Shared Function has the parameters (byval xx as xx).
What is the best/easiest way to "translate" it into VB.NET? Especially i tried to convert this code into VB.NET, but i failed with:
yield return new MatchNode(++index, current.Value);
What i have is:
Imports System.Collections
Imports System.Data.SqlTypes
Imports System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis
[code]....
What is the difference in the two blocks of code below? I expected them to return the same result, but they don't.
In the case where xml.@Type = "null", I want PatientMetricTypeID (a nullable Integer) to end up being Nothing.
Block #1: If()
In this case, it ends up as 0. It looks like Nothing is being treated as an Integer and converted to 0. I can sort of see why this might happen but not fully... I would like to understand exactly how this works, and if there is a workaround.
Dim PatientMetricTypeID As Integer? = If(xml.@Type = "null",
Nothing,
CType([Enum].Parse(GetType(PatientMetricTypes), xml.@Type), Integer))
Block #2: If
In this case, it ends up as Nothing -- expected behavior.
Dim PatientMetricTypeID As Integer?
If xml.@Type = "null" Then
[CODE]...
Possible Duplicates: Translation of yield into VB.NETYield In VB.NETI try to convert the C# yield to VB.NET but i found there is no yield in VB.NET
View 1 RepliesI have the following code below which has an error. When the checkbox is set to true and for example change the "role", and click save the following error is given;
"Index was outside the bonds of the array".
I know the reason of the error but don't know the solution..
The TxtPayCont is a concatenation of title, fname, and lname in an array. Therefore, if all the fields have values, then it works fine. So if it is Mr Jones Tim, this works, but, if it is Mr Jones it does not. It has to have 2 spaces to work. Is there anyway round this...
(see code below)..
Code:
I have a tricky piece of code in C# that I need translated to VB.NET. That's not usually a problem, as I can do it by hand or using one of the many conversion websites. However, this particular piece of code uses the Yield keyword; and I don't know how to work around that. [Code]
View 10 Replies1) Is it possible to access the Excel mathematical functions without actually opening Excel?
I was thinking of through a DLL WinAPI call or maybe a delegate function or smaller program?
2) Does anyone know of a MS link or area that gives instruction on "how to" use every function of every Windows DLL at all?
Or for all those that Microsoft have chosen to document online at least.
I am using a .Net JavaScript implementation called Jurassic to run user-controlled scripts within my .Net 4 WPF application coded in VB.Net - C# answers are fine. The script engine runs on its own thread and provides an API for the script to interact with my application. This all works really nicely until a user executes a script that causes an infinite loop and takes out a core of the processor.
[Code]...
The reason I care about keeping the thread alive is because the user who wrote the script and the user who is running it may not be the same, and I want to keep the experience as smooth as possible the the user running the thread. There also might be legitimate situations in which a single JavaScript function would run for a long time and I do not want to kill that, I just want to stop being allowed to hog the resources.
Solutions that involve stopping the thread from slowing down the system but that still show high CPU usage are not preferable because I do not want the user to wrongly feel that the application is resource intensive.
While converting types, I have found myself using both VB functions and BCL Convert.To* methods.
E.g.)
Cstr() vs. Convert.ToString()
CInt() vs. Convert.ToInt32()
CDbl() vs. Convert.ToInt64()
etc...
Are there any subtle differences that should be noted?
Is there a way to see exactly what the functions are doing. What i mean is there a way to see the class? I know what it does, i just want to know the code.
For example the function: Membership.FindUsersByName()
I see a couple of previously answered questions about adding an item to an IEnumerable in C#, but I'm stuck when trying to implement the proposed solution in VB.NET.
Option Strict On
Dim customers as IEnumerable(Of Customer)
' Return customers from a LINQ query (not shown)
customers = customers.Concat(New Customer with {.Name = "John Smith"})
The above code gives the error:
Option Strict On disallows implicit conversions from Customer to IEnumerable(Of Customer)