Implementing Interfaces On Classes That Already Have The Interface Members Defined?
Jun 25, 2010
So say I define some interface, and that interface has members that need to be implemented under some idea, and I then implement this interface on a class that already has those members defined. How do I NOT receive errors about having to implement said members despite them already being implemented (because I didn't type the oh so ridiculous 'implements IMyInterface.foo').
For example say I have an interface that defines the event KeyPress, and then I have a custom Form that implements this interface of mine. It throws an error. VB is the 5th language I've worked in that uses interfaces... and up until now they've all treated interfaces relatively the same. This is the first time I've seen this not allowed. What perplexes me more, is it IS allowed in other .Net languages. Just not VB.
[Code]...
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 21, 2009
I'm dealing a problem in implementing interface for multiple class.
Assuming I have a class named Class Unu .
I created an interface called Test for those 2 classes.
The first class Unu has 2 data members(i=12 and j=12.17). When you run the program it stores the result on screen 24.17
The second class called Doi has 2 data members(a=20 and b=32.17).
What I want now is to do the same thing for data members a and b so that it stores on screen 20+32.17=52.17
My problem is that I want to be displayed also the result for the 2 data members for the second class on my screen. I implemented the interface on class Doi but I cannot see why he isn't displaying me the second result 52.17.
What I must add to my code to do that?
Here's the full code:
CODE:
View 6 Replies
Jun 13, 2012
How can I structure my classes so that the user interfaces though a single class while the supporting classes are hidden from their view? I think its best understood in an example:
Public Class MyInterface
Public Economic as EconomicClass
Public Sub New()
MyBase.New()
[code].....
So you might ask why am I even separating them? It's strictly for others who will be working with this interface. I need to funnel them though a logical structure:
interface.Economic.MyMethod
interface.Currency.MyMethod
etc
This way everything is already handled for them in the background and they only need to run the method they need. I don't know if I can have it both ways in VB.NET.
View 23 Replies
Aug 10, 2010
Is it possible to automatically insert a Code Snippet when an interface is implemented? If so, how do you do it? I am looking for something similar to when you implement IDispoable in VB.[code]This will be used by web forms when transfering parameters from one page to the next using Server.Transfer
View 1 Replies
Apr 21, 2010
When I pass an an object 'MyObject' which implements 'IMyInterface' to a method parameter declared as IMyInterface, I understand that this method parameter 'sees MyObject through the eyes of its interface'.
View 2 Replies
Mar 13, 2011
Is is possible to implement a type specifier with 2 interfaces in .net? Something like:
Public Sub New(obj as ICollection and INotifyCollectionChanged)
''Initialize Code
End Sub
View 2 Replies
Jul 11, 2011
I'm migrating the CenterSnap.cls from its vb version to vb.NET and I'm confused about the following 2 errors after I import the vb6 project to VS 2008.
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
Sep 30, 2011
So I did tons and tons of work trying to make an interface for a common set of classes. The idea was to make an interface that each class could use within the set, but ultimately each class is different. Turns out interfaces do not like shared members. What I tried:
Public Interface ISomeInterface
Shared Property Meta() as Object
End Interface
Public Class A
Implements ISomeInterface
[Code]...
Obviously, had I done my homework on this, I would have known that shared members can't be use in interfaces. Should I just leave the individual classes completely responsible for handling its shared members? Is there another way to keep coupling down to a minimum with shared members? Theres about 20 something or so classes that will implement a single interface.
View 2 Replies
Jan 19, 2010
is there any reason why we couldn't add/extend an interface to an already existing class?
i believe this would be v useful. it would be like drawing links from my class to already existing classes, and drawing links from already existing classes to already existing classes
View 8 Replies
Nov 16, 2009
Sometime ago I used to create all my class structures in vision before I wrote them. That however didn't last. I found it easier to just make little drawings with pencil and piece of paper. And I still do to this day. In code usually those drawings manifest themselves as interfaces which then are implemented by different classes. I do all this in code. And I was just wondering if there is any tools available in Visual Studio for VB.NET that would allow to create interfaces and implement them in classes (which a lot of times means just adding variables to class that will hold data passed with interface attributes) from design mode(kinda like using Visio only after you finish you don't have to write out code).
View 3 Replies
May 10, 2012
I am trying to create an interface and then about 3 or 4 singleton classes that would be accessed via the interface.I know how to get interfaces to work and I know how to create concrete singleton classes and access them via GetInstance(). But when I put the two together, failure results.My problem is in the GetInstance method of the concrete singletons as in
Public Class MovingList
implements ISelectedList
[code]....
ISelectedList is the interface. This fails because ISelectedList.GetInstance is not of the type MovingList. Plus there is a problem with the use of Shared that I think is solved by simply deleting it (interfaces implicitly share).I can't define the type of ISelectedList.GetInstance because each of my singleton classes is of a different type even though they implement exactly the same properties and methods.How best to implement such singleton classes? I could do away with the interface and simply deal directly with the concrete singletons but that feels like bad practice. Programming to an abstraction not an implementation and all that.
View 6 Replies
Jun 18, 2010
So in a lot of frameworks there is usually some base type that you tend to extend a lot because well, it is what enables the "visual" aspect of the framework. Here in .Net it's the Control/Form... you tend to be inheriting these frequently for different things, and despite the suggestions otherwise, the team always agrees to extend explicitly and forget about composition.So now say you want to create some relationship between all of these... just a simple interface that uncovers some basic properties that all your forms and controls should have. In this case lets call it 'IProjControl'
Code:
Public Interface IProjControl
Property ProjControlId() As String
[code]....
So this interface is something you expect all your windows and dialog boxes and other some other controls implement. They all don't extend the same exact type, they all just happen to be controls.In there lies the problem... you want to enforce the contract with this interface that not only is it a 'IProjControl', but it's also a 'Control'. But we can't exactly have our interface extend Control (that doesn't make sense), and there isn't an 'IControl' interface to require implementing.
So the method I've always used is something like this:
Code:
Public Interface IProjControl
ReadOnly Property ProjControlComponent() As Control
Property ProjControlId() As String
[code]....
(if there is actually a language/compiler specific feature that allows you to require an interface implementation to be implemented by a class extending a specific type... please, do tell... but I highly doubt there is because for all intensive purposes that sounds weird).
View 12 Replies
Jun 20, 2012
Need a list of Pcap.Net members or classes? Their website doesn't have much documentation and have looked around in the forums.
I have found..
PacketTs = Packet.Timestamp.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss.fff")
PacketS = Packet.Ethernet.IpV4.Source
PacketSp = Packet.Ethernet.IpV4.Transport.SourcePort
PacketD = Packet.Ethernet.IpV4.Destination
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
Feb 16, 2011
I'm writing a WCF-Service and I split up my service class to multiple partial class files, so every ServiceContract-Implementation gets its own file. I have one file however that should contain e.g. members that are used by every partial class file such as a logger. The service is hosted with IIS 7 if this matters in any way.
[Code]....
The code compiles fine, but at runtime I get an BC30451: The name m_Log is not declared Error (Don't know the exact words for it. I get a german message ;) ). I don't think it has something to do with the type of m_Log or a depending assembly because I get the same error if i try this with a String. What am I doing wrong? How can I make this work? Edit: I was trying the same thing in a simple console application without any problems. :(
View 1 Replies
Mar 28, 2011
I've read that modules are basically shared classes. For a module though, you can call a method directly without prefixing the module name. So I can do this: methodTest("abc", mod1Enum.enum2)But for a class with shared members I have to fully qualify the method call, and in this case fully qualify the enum:[code]In our conversion from VB6 to .NET the need to fully qualify all calls like this might be an argument for us to bring our VB6 modules over as modules instead of converting them to classes.
View 7 Replies
Oct 13, 2011
I'm working on learning VB.Net after having programmed in VB6, VBA, and VBScript for several years. I'm assuming that something that begins with the letter I is an interface. However, a lot of places I see people/documentation referring to what appears to be class objects that begin with I. I guess I'm under the impression that Interfaces are contracts that class objects can agree to.
[Code]...
View 5 Replies
Oct 20, 2009
As my latest questions have stated, i am in a process of researching on Silverlight 3 and its application as a suitable RIA solution to a pre-built project a client of ours wishes to webify. And my experience in .Net and silverlight is about 3 - 4 weeks.I have now become aware of .Net RIA Services. I require to use an existing VB class; which was created as a quick wrapper class to emulate a small piece of the client's application code. This is used as a proof of concept. It contains one function which uses the client's DLL files to return a simple data type This class has already been used successfully with Flex/Weborb combination.I unfortunately do not have enough knowledge or experience in Silverlight/RIA Services to grasp what it is i have to do to get the file working. All the examples I find online only specify the method where you use a database as dataSource etc.Could you please inform me how i would go about implementing RIA Services with Silverlight 3, using existing code/classes with no DB? Or could you point me in a direction for further research on the matter?
View 1 Replies
Apr 30, 2012
I have ended up with the following event structure in a custom control - it seemed to be the recommended way for my scenario in MSDN (though it wasn't easy to follow!) This is the MSDN page I used,MSDN - How to: Implement Events in Your Class.
[code]...
What now has me totally confused (even more so than I was about setting up the above pattern) is what to declare in the Interface? I wanted to declare the event in the interface since there will be several other classes that do similar things and they need to be used interchangeably (hence an Interface in the first place) and if I've gone down the Interface route it seems smart to make sure the 'minimum' content that each class will have to implement declared in the Interface...
View 13 Replies
Oct 28, 2010
I am working on a plugin architecture and after some reading I have settled on one. The host class will be implemented in C# as well as some of the plugins for that host. The issue I am having is that some of my team uses VB.net. So the question, is it possible to implement a C# (plugin)interface in VB, such that when it is dynamically loaded into the host program it will have the methods required by the interface.
View 1 Replies
Mar 1, 2010
I'm currently trying to create a class that is a composition of the SqlDataAdapter class (as unfortunately you can't inherit from it). In order to try and make it as similar as possible I'm using all the same inherits and interfaces as is documented on MSDN.The problem that I am having is that there are some properties where the interface specifies that the type of the property is IDbCommand. But in the SqlDataAdapter the property type is SqlCommand.
View 3 Replies
Nov 29, 2011
In our current project I am using a generic interface iService which is inherited by all other service interfaces. For instance IService is inherited by ILogService.
The ILogService interface is then implemented by LogService as below:
Public Interface IService(Of T)
Sub Save(ByVal T As IEntity)
Sub Remove(ByVal T As IEntity)
[Code]....
How can I update the method signature so T is displayed as Log?
View 2 Replies
Sep 30, 2011
this wont be easy to explain clearly but here goes..i have something that works fine in VB but not in C#.i have 2 classes, each class implements a different interface. each interface exposes an Initialize() function that should get called automatically when the plugin loads. since each class has an Initialize() function, i can watch both functions get called in the log. this works fine in VB.
when i do this same thing in C#, only the Initialize() in the first class gets called. anyone have a clue as to why this might be happening?
[Code]...
as you can see the code is identical in both languages. why does it work in VB and not in C#?
View 2 Replies
Feb 26, 2010
I have an interface that I've defined and am working through a bunch classes that will implement it. I'm noticing that in 95% of the implementations, I'm only changing a few lines of the code, so I'd like to know if it's possible to have my IDE generate a block of code inside of a method upon implementation, much the same as implementing IDisposable.not mark my posts as answered. It is extremely rude. You have no idea if you've answered my question.I WILL come back and mark the ones that are answers, as answers.
View 7 Replies
Feb 3, 2011
In some DLL, I have an interface defined like this (shortened code):
Public Interface wsIInvoice
''' <summary>
''' Perform plugin specific actions for a given memberhip invoice that is processedin an incasso batch, and return success result.
[Code].....
The DLL implementing the interface has a reference to the one defining it. And the defining DLL is imported.
I'm doing exactly the same thing in another DLL, and there VS does not complain.
View 2 Replies
Feb 1, 2011
I have to begin saying that I'm working with Visual Basic. The problem is that I have a Entity Framework object and I want to indicate that this object implements a interface, for example:
Public Interface ICatalog
Property created_at() As Date
Property id() As Long
End Interface
Those properties are allready in the object. In c# I've done this just by declaring a partial class of the object and indicates that implements that interface, but in basic is not working, I supouse that is because of the language sintaxis used to declare that a property is implementing some property of the interface, for example:Public Property created_at() As Date Implements ICatalog.created_at
View 2 Replies
May 10, 2010
In VS2008, I can stub out interface members with the following code using TextSelection to insert the implement line and then "simulate" the Enter key by inserting a new line. However, it doesn't work anymore in VS2010.
CodeClass cclass = {Target_Class};
TextSelection txtSel = {After_Class_Declaration_Line};
foreach (string i in interfacesFullName)
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
Mar 5, 2010
At the moment I'm trying to create a kind of model in vb.net which can be used to create/fetch database entrys.
I created a main class Model with a shared function to fetch the datasets, e.g. Model.find(). Now I'd like to create Classes which inherit the main Model-Class, e.g. a separate one for users: UserModel.find() => "SELECT * FROM users".
What I need now is to find a way to tell the Class which table it should use. I thought about an abstract String "table" which is a constant in each "child-model", but how could this be implemented as it's not possible to override shared members?
Edit: Maybe this will make it a little clearer what I mean:
Public Class Model
Public Shared _controller As Controller
Public Shared table As String
[Code].....
So I want a shared method which finds all database entries and gives back an array of instances of its own type, e.g. Model(). That's why I wanted to keep the find-method shared and not bound to an instance.
View 4 Replies
Mar 2, 2010
We have an interface, which can be grossly simplified as:
[Code]...
View 3 Replies
Jul 13, 2010
I defined the following interface:
Interface INewFileDetector
...
roperty PollIntervalMsec As Integer
[code].....
View 2 Replies
Sep 21, 2011
I need to implement an event interface defined in a COM app so I can get events. I want to use System.Runtime.InteropServices.ComTypes.IConnectionPointContainer. In Adam Nathan's ".NET and COM", Adam shows some C# code that connects to an IE event set. There he does this:
[Code]...
View 10 Replies
