Impliment A ISaveOrUpdateEventListener To Set The Datecreated And Dateupdated Fields On Entities
Aug 8, 2011
I'm just starting out a new project, and am trying to impliment a ISaveOrUpdateEventListener to set the datecreated and dateupdated fields on my entities.
I've been trying to follow a simplified version of the solution found here: [URL] Here's my listener:
I was making a project with forms and now i needed to add a microsoft word project. I want my forms to call the project so it can load up with data from the forms. How do i call the word project from my form when i click on a button?
I'm currently refactoring an old Visual Basic DLL (VB.Net), which stores all of its data in one module called Globaldefinitions as public fields. There are about 200 fields, referenced thousands of times all around the code:
Public Module Globaldefinitons Public a As Short ... Public zz10 As Double
[Code]...
I need to change the module into a class with non-shared fields. This means, each and every of these thousands of references needs to reference the instance of that class:
globalDefinitionsInstance.a = 5
How do I go about this efficiently?
Regular expressions operating on the source fall flat. Refactoring tools like Re-Sharper or CodeRush don't seem to offer this functionality. Visual Studio 2010 cannot do it automatically either.
Class Foo ReadOnly name As String Public Sub New(name As String, dependentUpon As Foo) Me.name = name
[code]....
The output of New Bar() is:
Dependent created. Dependent upon nothing. Independent created. Dependent upon nothing.
It seems fields are initialized in the same order as they appear in the source code, which (a) leads to an unexpected result, and (b) seems a little puzzling, given that one is normally not permitted to read from uninitialized variables in .NET, yet that seems to be working fine above.I would've expected VB.NET to be smart enough to initialize referenced fields first, and only then those that reference it; i.e. I'd have liked to see this output instead:
Independent created. Dependent upon nothing. Dependent created. Dependent upon Independent.
how to get VB.NET to behave like that instead, without simply having to swap the declaration order of dependent and independent inside class Bar?
I'm trying to create a table in Word using data from a table in Access. There are four fields in the access table that I need. 3 fields are text which I can populate the Word without any issues. However the fourth field is a memo with >255 characters.I'm struggling to come up with the proper code to allow me to populate the Word field with the memo data that has more than 255 characters. The code I have so far is listed below. But when it hits the memo field, it crashes on the line I marked with **. I know it's not text, but I've tried many different field types, but nothing has worked so far.[code]...
My intent is to have the code - on a button.click event - check the Username and Password fields and return an error depending on which is wrong. Or if both are wrong, return a different error message. I've set the username as parts and the password as parts (still learning how to use external authentication). [Code]
I have several sqldatasources for my gridview. All of the columns are autogenerated. However they all have some consistent fields and I'd like to make those fields template fields so I can modify the edit template for them such as adding a drop down menu. Is this possible?
experience on how to create an engine using C# (VB.NET is okay too) that is generic enough to handle most cases of MS Word text fields I need to fill with data I'm getting from a database? In short, I'm about to embark on this little Office automation excursion and I'm hoping a little bit of feedback here.
I am quite new to VB and have a Problem. I need to step through all IE entities and extract the html source of a tab where some conditions are met.
Private Sub TabPage1_Enter(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles TabValues.Click, TabPage1.Enter, TabPage2.Enter Dim err = "", status As String = ""
Central Database (replicated across multiple servers) Client Database 1 Client Database 2
The Central db has Users and Roles amongst other things The Client dbs have similar tables to each other but with some fields tweaked - contact, address, At present, each client db has its own user/role information which is copied from the central db by a scheduled process. I want to retrieve the user/role information directly from the central db instead (bearing in mind tables in the client db make reference to the user entity)
Given two tables, customer and orders, how would one do a linq query to entities to find any customers with open invoices started before a certain date?
I am just digging into L2Sql and I am a little confused on what to do about inserting several records into my database that are related.
For example:
I have an entity mapped to a user table called user. This class contains UserId and Username.
I have an entity mapped to a preference table called preference. This class contains PrefId, PrefName, UserId.
I have an entity mapped to a profile table called profile. This class contains ProId, ProName, UserId.
When I ask a user to register for an account, this will populate a User object. I will then create two "blank" objects to relate to this user, a profile and a preference.
I notice that the dbml has a User property on both the profile and prefernce entities. Am I right in thinking that if I pass the User object to this property, this in turn sets the UserId for these objects?
If thats the case, when do I actually do this? Surely I would need to InsertOnSubmit the user object, query it back to get the Id and then pass this User object to the others before Inserting them?
At the moment I have this,
Dim reg As New User reg.Username = username Dim pro As New Profile
When I load it into the .NET XmlDocument and issue a Save, i.e.:
xmlDoc = New XmlDocument() xmlDoc.Load("c: empar.xml") xmlDoc.Save("c: empad.xml")
the new XML file contains the resolved amp 176 (a degree sign). This then breaks the final black box I'm trying to load the XML into. I've tried playing with the encoding, to little effect. Is it possible for the parser to just echo what came in, without resolving the entities? Inerestingly, it doesn't resolve °
I have a table which contains a list of products for a company. They input data about how much stock they have and also the level at which they want to be reminded that they need to order new stock.
[Code]...
I want to list all the true results in a form which the user is then able to navigate through. What would be the best way to go about doing this?
I've just gotten started with development using Visual Studio (though this can be seen as a more language-generic question), and need done design answers regarding how to suitable relate a Database Entity/Table with an Class in-code.
Currently, I create a class who's attributes or iVars directly correspond to the fields in an Entity.
When I come to fetching all 'Customers from a Table' for example, I run a Select all statement against the database and for each result-row returned, I instantiate a new class Object where I use the Class' default constructor to set the instance variables. (I really wish there was a method like PHP's mysql-fetch-object()?)
I can then add each of these objects to say, a List(of Customer) and return it.
This doesn't seem like the best way to do it. If I were to change the Database schema, I'd have to reflect those changes in the class also.
I have a Page class and a PageCollection class in a 3d party ORM framework. I can fill the PageCollection based on parameters (pageid, parentid, url etc..) (SQL query). But I need the data multiple times around the ASP.NET MVC website (Sitemap, Authentication), so I chose to load all pages 1 time and reference that (global) collection.
GlobalClass.Pages //is PageCollection containing all pages
I have now created functions which return a temporary subcollection or single entity based on the parameters mentioned before (pageid, parentid, url etc..).
GlobalClass.Pages.GetByPageId(id) //returns single page entity GlobalClass.Pages.GetByParentId(parentid) //returns subcollection
The site however got very slow.
cache the subcollections (GetByParent())? create internal hash-lookup tables for the collection? Something else...?
Namespace BLL Public Class PageCollection Inherits CustomCollectionBase
I have seen other similar questions dealing with WPF Almost exactly the same but I can;tfigure this out in ASP.net. I have a Pages table with a parentpage foreign key and want to databind them to a treeview. In the past I have created a hierarchicaldataset from a dataset but would like to stay within the entities framework if I can
the query below throws a System.NotSupportedException: "Unable to cast the type 'System.Linq.IOrderedQueryable1' to type 'System.Linq.IQueryable1'. LINQ to Entities only supports casting Entity Data Model primitive types." The exception is only raised in the VB.Net version. When translated to C#, no exception is raised.
Dim doesThisCrash = From outerOrder In orders Where outerOrder.ProductId = (From p In products Join o In orders On p.Id Equals o.ProductId
I am using LINQ with Entity Framework, and I need to get the SQL server timeCan anyone tell me how can I create a method so it retrieves the current server time?
I'm a bit of a n0ob to all this and I'm having trouble finding good resources on the net.What I'm trying to do is define a one-to-many relationship between two entities. I'm using the GUI tool in Visual Studio - and have created the tables in Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio.Basically, I have two tables....a 'Users' table and a 'Sites' table. A single user can have many sites associated with it.Users has a primary key of 'UID' and the Sites table as a primary key of 'Site_ID'.Sites also has a column 'UID' that should indicate which user that site is associated with.Anyway - it sounded pretty simple; but no matter what I attempt to do, I can't seem to get it to work. Mostly, I get validation errors - sometimes run-time errors, or sometimes, no actual data even though there should sites that match the UID of the user.I am able to connect and write LINQ against my Users table/pull down User objects - but can't seem to get it to know that the Sites are associated with the user.In the GUI - if I go to 'Add Association' and create a 1 to many link between Accounts and Sites - and Validate - I get an error saying, "Error1Error 11008: Association 'AccountsSites' is not mapped."
It seems like, when I try to make an association, it wants to link the 'Keys' of each entity.But U_ID and SITE_ID are the keys and, obviously, shouldn't match.If I click on the line it created in the GUI and I go to 'Table Mapping' I can see that it is trying to match those keys. Since I want it to match user_ids my first thought is to just make the U_ID the entity Key in the Sites entity but, of course, that's wrong because it would no longer allow a 1 to many relationship.
Well first off let me say I am not sure if this should be in network or game programing but I think network programing is more relevant.
Anyway
I am creating my first game that runs over a network and so far everything is working. I have a server program, the clients can connect and see each other flying around. (weeeee)
However I have hit a wall when trying to make them shoot. The most easy way I can think to do this, is to have the client tell the server �hay i need a bullet pointing at x angle moving at y speed� the server then spawns a bullet entity then sends a spawn entity packet to all the clients. The main problem I see with this, is that the clients gun will have a delay based on latency.(funValue -= 1000)
The only other way I can think to do this, is to have some fake bullets spawn on the client but when the client gets the spawn bullet packet from the server, I am not sure how to keep track of what fake bullets to delete.
Basically I have the follwing:Dim ctx As New AdminCoreEntities Dim roles = (From r In ctx.Roles where r.Name.StartsWith("cust") Select r) 'list of System .Linq.IQueryable(Of AdminCoreModel.Role)
[code]...
The error i get when i run this is: Unable to cast object of type System.Data.Objects.ObjectQuery`1[AdminCoreModel.Role] to type AdminCoreModel.Role
Basically I have a many to many situation and I try to get all the Quicklinks objects queried by their roles and not quite sure why EF will cast to a single AdminCoreModel.Role when i.Roles is a collections of objects.
I am trying to write a query for an existing database, I am using LINQ on EF3.5 inside VS2008 as that is the only environment available to me.I have a starter query that gives me a list of items so the user can select what they want.
"e.Result = From c In MLDb.TBL_FeatureInfoSet Order By c.INSP_ROUTINE_NM Select c.INSP_ROUTINE_NM Distinct"
The user can then select from the list one or several items they are intersted in and i want to use these as the filter in a further database call. It's not then difficult to have a where to filter on one string however, I would also like to be able to allow the user to select several items from the list box and the data for all of those to be returned.
'check for empty return Dim count As Integer = (From s In myEntity.employee Where employeeID = myEmployeeIDVariable).Count 'If there is a record, then process
SELECT C1, C2, C3 FROM T1 WHERE T1.C4='xyz' AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM T2 WHERE T1.C17 = T2.C24) ORDER BY C3
I'm using EF CTP 5, so I have a DBContext variable named dbc, which includes DBSet objects T1s and T2s, based on POCOs T1 and T2.
In LINQ I write
DIM IND = From i In dbc.T1s Where i.C4 = "xyz" And (From t In dbc.T2s Where i.C17 = t.C24).Any Select i.C1, i.C2, i.C3 Order By C3
Running the query I get the error message "Unable to create a constant value of type 'T2'. Only primitive types ('such as Int32, String, and Guid') are supported in this context." When I omit the inner expression (third line in the LINQ code), the query runs fine. I tried switching the orders of the inner comparison, to be t.C24 = i.C17, with no effect.
I had a code segment on an asp.net page in the code-behind file. I decided to move it into a public subroutine in a module (general_functions.vb). Once I did this, however, the code no longer works - it throws an error. On the original code-behind I replaced the original code with a call like so:
i am caching objects, if i make linq queries on cached entities then... will theses queries make database round trip due to lazy loading in Entity framework?