I'm trying to build a multithreaded app but I couldnt find anything on google on how to catch the value that the lambda function returns.
ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(New WaitCallback(Function() As Integer
Value += 1
Return Value
End Function))
Here's my situation: I'm tryring to build a very simpe minigame in which the player has to pursuit and catch certain figures on the screen. This figures are currently showed as images on PictureBox wich i pass ByRef to some classes where the movement subrutines are. I have all the graphics in PNG, with transparent background, format and they look fine on the background, but when 2 or more of this figures are over the same place on the screen every PictureBox covers the underlying figure, so all i can see is one figure over the background.I was wondering if theres a way to solve this... Maybe using more powerfull libraries or something like that.
View 4 RepliesI have a program in VB.Net that receives mails from Outlook, extracts attachments and inserts the attachments into a table through a query. I would like to put the query/queries in a Try/Catch block, but cannot do so as Outlook exceptions cannot be caught, and it gives me an error, and unless I put a very specific exception, I cannot catch it. Is there a workaround?
Edit:
Try
Catch ex As Exception
End Try
Exception is underlined and when I hover on it, it says: "Catch cannot catch type 'Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.Exception' because it is not in 'System.Exception' or a class that inherits from 'System.Exception'". This is affecting all my other code which I'd like to put into a Try/Catch block.
The following code causes a "Warning" that Variable is used before value assigned.How do I restructure this Try/catch to eliminate error on the myreader.close command in the Catch part? Code appears to work fine but I dont like Warnings. [code]
View 8 Repliesi have problem when i click a ADD button, there is one null value in the textbox .. so the try catch statemnt is to catch that null value error but after that the catch is success but the button click never stop excute the statemnt till the end of the button event.
View 6 RepliesI have this scenario: in a Sub I have a Try...Catch statement.Within that Try..Catch I call another sub.In that 2nd sub is also a Try...Catch.(see below for example).Now if an exception occurs in the 2nd sub's Try...Catch, which Catch gets excecuted? The 2nd one, the 1st one or both?
Private Sub sub1()
Try
..do stuff[code].....
If I throw an exception from within a catch, does the finally (from the catch) still execute? i.e.
Try
..some code with an exception in it...
catch ex as Exception
throw new SpecialException("blah blah" & ex.Message, ex)
[code]....
I need to catch log4net exceptions (its own exceptions not app exceptions logged by it). I wish there's a way of doing it this way: [code] I have this code implemented and there's no errors in compilation but i force log4net to have an error (pointing to a non existing database in the config file) and nothing is threw.I've tried the listener aproach: [code] and it's writing the errors to log4net.txt, the forced ones i mean.This last aproach has a couple of drawbacks: it won't append every error to the file, if the error is the same it doesn't write it, i can't get the listener to write every error to that file, only one (I don't know how to fully configure the trace listener, it might be that). Thus it won't append the date and hour to every line wich is a necesity for me. Finally i can't give structure to it (xml). Even if the listener work i need to use the try/catch aproach, since i'm using ExceptionHandling from Enterprise library to log the errors in my app.
View 1 RepliesI have an ASP.NET web application (VB.NET) using an Oracle database. On an insert, I need to get the identity of the inserted row back. I am trying to use RETURNING, but I keep getting a value of 1 returned.
Dim strInsert As String = "INSERT INTO L.TRANSACTIONS (LOCATION_KEY, TRANS_CREATOR, TRANS_EMAIL, TRANS_PHONE) VALUES (:location_key, :trans_creator, :trans_email, :trans_phone) RETURNING TRANS_ID INTO :ukey"
[Code].....
I am using VB.NET 2005 to create a Windows forms application. I have a procedure named SendMail that creates an instance of Outlook.Application, to send an email from my application. I found the code on this forum, I think.The procedure works fine, but I can't use error handling with it.I call the procedure from a button click event. I put the procedure call in a try/catch block, and the application won't build, with the following error.
Error 68 'Catch' cannot catch type 'Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.Exception' because it is not 'System.Exception' or a class that inherits from 'System.Exception'. C:datadevdmtiQTSQTSv7_1_20100212wQTSQTSReportsCriteria
pt_frmReportViewer.vb 43 21 QTS
Here is the code:
Sub SendMail(ByVal sFile As String)
' Create an Outlook application.
Dim oApp As Outlook._Application
[code]....
(Edit: to clarify, my main goal is concurrency, but not necessarily for multi-core machines)
I'm fairly new to all concepts on concurrency, but I figured out I needed to have parallel drawing routines, for a number of reasons:
I wanted to draw different portions of a graphic separatedly (background refreshed less often than foreground, kept on a buffer). I wanted control about priority (More priority to UI responsiveness than drawing a complex graph). I wanted to have per-frame drawing calculations multithreaded. I wanted to offer cancelling for complex on-buffer drawing routines.
However, being such a beginner, my code soon looked like a mess and refactoring or bug-fixing became so awkward that I decided I need to play more with it before doing anything serious.
So, I'd like to know how to make clean, easy to mantain .NET multithreaded code that makes sense when I look at it after waking up the next day. The bigest issue I had was structuring the application so all parts talk to each other in a smart (as opposed to awkward and hacky) way.
I have a preference for sources that I can digest in my free time (e.g., not a 500+ pages treatise on concurrency) and for C#/VB.NET, up to the latest version (since I see there have been advances). Basically I want something straight to the point so I can get started by playing with the concepts on my toy projects.
As the question states, can a shared method of an object be multithreaded? I don't quite having threading down in my skillset, otherwise I would test myself. On the other hand, I am involved in designing class that could be part of a multithreaded application in VB.Net.
View 3 RepliesI don't want it to be MultiThreaded. i read some tutorials and have a good idea. but unfortuantely all the tutorials on the web write code without explaining. so is anyone here has a good knowledge with Chat application ? I know it's about sockets and stuff but i just need an explaination with code ;)
View 5 RepliesI am using Visual Basic 2008 Express Edition and I want to create a multithreaded application.
View 13 RepliesI have a background thread that waits for data to come in. When data arrives, it fires off a call to the GUI thread.All works just peachy, except if there's ever a run-time exception in the GUI thread. If that happens, the debugger always halts at the point in the worker thread that called the GUI thread. It never shows the proper line that the error occured on.How do I get the debugger to stop at the error in the GUI thread?
Here's the pertinent code from the worker thread:
Code:
Public NotInheritable Class UIThreadMarshal
Private Shared _MainForm As Form = Nothing
Public Shared WriteOnly Property MainForm() As Form
[code]....
After trying to make an application multithreaded, almost towards the end of the processing of 10,000 records, I get a webexception - operation timeout.Now it seems to process around 8000 records just fine, for each record it is also doing some business logic and with it, performing a call to a webservice.
without threading, its fine - no problems. with threading, we hit the issue.so there are 10,000 records to go through. this is of course slow when done in sync mode (Single threading) but much faster when placing items in the threadpool and waiting until completion.
im not sure exactly why the problem happens. how should I debug this when multithreading? its just odd that for around 3/4 of records, the calls are doing very well, then on the last bit to go, it bombs out.
again - no issues when single threading.update: seems to be after around 1000 records that have been processed that it seems to happen.the application calls out to an internal webservice which then does the direct callout to the "outside world" webservice. The internal webservice does some caching but shouldnt have any effect really.
The outside service it is calling is httpBinding. ReceiveTimeout is set to 00:10:00 (10 minutes) and bypassProxyOnLocal="false"im still not quite understanding why it would timeout after 1000 records because it seems to process the others just fine and does come back (or so it seems) when its making a call to the service
My brain may just be fried since it's the end of the semester, but my teacher kicked this back to fix and resubmit...she said that I am "returning the name of your function rather than your variable name".
Here is my code for all 3 forms.
code:
These are forms to calculate the cost of getting a cell phone package.
I'm trying to build an application to monitor a site to build statistics from the data being read. This HTML looks like this.
<div id="history">
<h4>HISTORY</h4>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
[code]...
Now I can read the html and put the text anywhere, I just don't how to read specific parts so I can separate the data out.
I have a Form with a Media Player in it. Which plays a Song.
[Code]...
It's playing in the background since the Form is hidden. When I play itin Debug, everything works fine. When I run the app outside Debug, I get this error: [URL] The Music File is there, but strangely, there comes this weird error.
In a multithreaded application. I have a bunch of function that loop through a collection to read the information. I also have a bunch of function that modifies that same collection.
I'm looking for a way to isolate all the read and the write together. I don't want a write to be done while a read is in progress. I was thinking of using SyncLock on the collection object but this will block multiple read trying to work in parallel.
I started throwing exceptions on a multithreaded application, and got a mess.There is a good tutorial on managing exceptions in multithreaded applications?
View 4 RepliesI have developed a multithread Windows Application that requires to print various Docss/rpt's off. The problem is I get a "Load Report Failed" error message when creating a new instance of my embedded crystal report.
View 3 RepliesGiven the code, ss there a way to propagate messages send from any of the multithreaded chat client to all the other chat client:
First the main will call startClient:
Public Sub startClient(ByVal inClientSocket As TcpClient, _
ByVal clineNo As String)
[code]......
A particular VB.NET project is actually throwing 'Build Failed' But when I try rebuilding again it says 'Rebuild Succeeded'. It keeps alternating this behavior. Kind of random. Any vbc.exe issue of long locking the PDB or xml files?
View 9 RepliesI have a vb.net 2008 windows form application that I was just assigned to work on. how to maintain and test changes to both the pre build and the post build events? Can you tell me how to test these events? My postbuild event, I believe calls a project file in the solution file that wraps files together in a bundle in debug mode. Can you tell me how the posbuild event works and when it is called?
View 2 RepliesI am using 2008 Express Edition. I am trying to make a Release build instead of a Debug build.Under Tools->Options, Projects and Solutions->General - I checked Show advanced build configurations. The option to switch configurations does not show up in the IDE.
After this, I went to the Project Properties->Compile and switched the Configuration from Active(Debug) to Release.After building, I looked in my project directory, however only in the Debug sub-directory was the .exe and nothing in the Release sub-directory.I have used Visual C++ Express Edition, where I noticed that if you do not change to Release in the IDE than after changing to Release in properties, resets the project to the last configuration setting which is usually Debug.how to make the Debug/Release box available in the IDE, since Tools/Options does not make it show up?
I just created a simple application. I Builded that using build->build myapp. I got .exe of that application. i runned. all went fine. but when i closed that app, even after closing it is in memory. it is still running. how to deploy it properly?
View 12 RepliesI have an application using taskfactory that creates multiple tasks which insert records into the same table in a database. I have jobs that cleanup the table when it gets too large and have the execution time-out set to 0 in options in sql server management studio. I keep getting the following error on the tasks when trying to do an insert using a stored procedure and set an exception handling process to sleep and try again. This does not help as it seems it timeouts on almost every attempt.Not sure how to handle this and ensure the table handles all these inserts. Tried including connect timeout = 600 in one of the processes connectionstring but this did not help.Also set sqlquerytimeout value in registry to 90 but still not helping.
ERROR: timeout expired the timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding...
could not see the details of the error since visual studio 2010 debug options had to be set that way, but I will set a responsestream and capture but I rebooted sql server and somehow everything is fine now...not sure why.
Errors have reoccurred.
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception,
Boolean breakConnection)
[code]....
I have been reading through lots of sample code and explainations regaurding the uses of Sync lock in multithreaded programs but still am a little fuzzy on this.
Am I correct in assuming that if I have two or more threads running the same procedure which has a sync lock on a shared resource that the first thread to call the lock will complete its update of the resource and any of the other threads to try and lock this object would just wait in line until it is released by the first object?
I am also a bit fuzzy on what is actually locked by the sync lock.
Lets say I have code that uses sync lock and the object specified is the current thread. Does that also lock the shared resources that are referenced within the sync lock block or would I need to use another method to do this?
What if my shared resourses were all in another class and I issue a sync lock on that class before I try to modify the resources would that be the proper way to go about it?
And last but not least is there any need to use sync lock when the shared resource is in effect read only [meaning the program will read the value but will not change it during runtime]
I've finally gotten multi-threading working on my application, but now I'm having trouble showing forms when I need to. I currently have three threads in my program: one for updating a textbox, one for transferring files, and one for displaying forms. Here's a snippet of code from my program:
[code]...
I'm getting the error: Control 'frmXCopy' accessed from a thread other than the thread it was created on. I know what this means, but I can't find a way to make the ShowForm Sub run off of the main application thread.