I'm using a dataset class written by others who have defined the foreign key relationships between tables using the tools in the schema diagram. I'm binding the dataclass to a windows form. I'm running into an issue where I have an existing header record and I'm trying to insert data into a child table via a grid programmatically. The child table contains all keys for data. As the grid is bound to a binding source, I'm simply adding rows directly to the grid programmatically.
When I attempt to save the data, I get the error ForeignKeyConstraint FX_Activity_UserRoleActivity Requires Child Key Values (4) to exist in the parent table. The value (4) is one of the foreign key values and it does exist in the parent table. The error occurs when I tell the bindingsource associated to the child table on the form to EndEdit. Looking at the XSD file for the dataset, both foreign keys are set up for 'Both Foreign and Key Constraint' with Cascade set for both update rule and delete rule. Accept/Reject rule is set to none.
Running a SQL trace, I confirmed that SQL Server is not generating the error, so it is occurring on the client application somewhere. First what does the error actually mean? Second, does the configuration of the foreign key relationship in the dataset's XSD file have anything to do with it? If so how should the foreign keys be set up between the tables? If it isn't how would you go about troubleshooting this issue as stepping through the code ends with the .EndEdit call to the binding source.
I think this is an IDE problem, but may be my lack of understanding, so apologies if I am wrong.I have an SQL database, VS2005 app working fine, but if I put a foreign key constraint on the relation between 2 tables, as soon as I try to access the table it throws an exception as shown below. Exception.InnerException for details. The error is: DataMember property 'tblProduct_tblStock' cannot be found on the DataSource.If I delete the foreign key constraint it works perfectly happily. I am at a loss since the error seems to be one that I would expect at compile rather than run, and anyway does not seem to be true since the relationship is clearly there in the DataSource (otherwise I wouldn't be able to edit it to remove the constraint!) Possibly I am doing something stupid, but the exception is confusing me too much to let me see it. All I am trying to do is ensure that I can't create a stock record without the product existing, without coding a check - which I thought was a straightforward SQL approach
I am trying to input value to AppSchedNumber into my AppInfo table which is the primary key of my AppExamSchedule (auto inrement). The problem is I can't insert on my AppInfo because my AppSchedNumber on my AppExamSchedule should be the same.
I am using VS2008 Standard, Access 2007 and VB.net. I have an Access db with a Membership table, a DuesPayment table and a table linking the two together.
[code]....
1) In VS I have a single form (frmMembership). I used the Data Sources window to create a single datasource containing the tables tblMembers, tblDuesPayment and lktblMemToPay. from the 'Data Sources' window I drug tblMembers, as text boxes, to the form. I drug tblDuesPayment to the form as a DataGridView.
I right-clicked 'dsMembership...Edit in Dataset Designer' and checked that the relations between the three tables was as shown above. I left all other settings as they were created by VS.When I execute the app I get the member information as expected and can use the TblMembersBindingNavigator to step through the members. The DataGridView, instead of showing dues payment information for the member showing on the form, shows ALL of the dues information for ALL members does not exhibit any relationship between tblMembers and tblDuesPayment.
2)I also tried creating a dataset for tblMembers only. Then I used 'dsMembership.Edit in DatasetDesigner' window to create a TableAdapter for tblDuesPayment and lktblMemToPay. I got the same results.
3) I tried various other combinations, like creating TableAdaptors for tblMembers and a TableAdaptor for a combination of lktblMemToPay & tblDuesPayment.
How would I connect different tables with each other in vbnet2008 which ive connected by the database wizard? Also I want to connect this table for the search purpose. I filter it by Name which is in my personal_informationtbl so the rest of the table must show the related information about the Name that I've searched. So meaning if I just search by name it shows related information from the records not just from the personal_informationtbl but fill the other tables with the related information.
I have a Database with the following tables, PolicyHolder, Beneficiary, FinacialDetails, Gender, Nationality, Relationship, Income. They are all linked by ClientID primary key of the PolicyHolder table.
When i'm adding my data in the Beneficiary table using a DataGridView i get an error when im adding the second entry saying - FK ClientID already has a value and this value cannot be duplicated. I want the FK ClientID value to be saved on every record i enter under Beneficiary.
I'm going to describe this as simple as possible, and it a typical setup for a database...
I have 1 DataSet, 2 DataGridViews (DGV), and 2 BindingSources (BS). The DataSet has 2 tables and 1 Relationship (FK).
Table 1 is a employee table Table 2 is timeclock data. Both tables contain a column: EmployeeId
FK is linked to EmployeeId of both tables.
DGV1 has it's datasource=BS1 BS1 has it's datasource=DataSet and it's DataMember=Table 1. Thus DGV1 shows Table 1.
DGV2 has it's datasource=BS2 BS2 has it's datasource=BS1 and it's DataMember=FK Thus DGV2 shows Table 2 filtered by what's selected in DGV1.
Now when I use the mouse or keyboard to select a cell in DGV1, the relationship causes DGV2 to update to only show data from Table 2 where the EmployeeId row equals that from the selection in Table 1. With me so far?
Well all that works great. But what if I need to programmatically select a row in Table 1 to cause Table 2 to update? I've tried everything I can think of, but Table 2 NEVER updates when I attempt to programmatically select a row or cell in Table 1.
Basically, I am trying to write a LINQ to Objects statement where the relationship is a grandparent, parent, child relationship. (You could also call it a Master Detail relationship.)
Dim coverages As New List(Of Coverage) Dim coverage As Coverage For Each rl In oClaimsPolicy.RiskLocations
I am using VS2008 and SQLite. I have created a database and several tables and am attempting to populate the tables with data from arrays.
The following code (example) works fine but stops after it inserts 30 to 50 records. I am running the VB code in debug mode and when it stops, I press pause to see where it is. It stops on "SQLcommand.ExecuteNonQuery()" and when I press continue (F5) it will insert another 30 to 50 records.
I do not get an error message. Is this a timeout issue? How do I keep the loop running to the end of the array?
have a datagridview containing 2 tables left joined, so that:table1 LEFT JOIN table 2 ON table1.id=table2.idI get an error whenever I try to edit my datagridview."invalidOperationException was unhandled by the user codeDynamic SQL generation is not supported against multiple base tables."The error points to this line:
da.FillSchema(dt, SchemaType.Mapped) da.Update(dt) << This line 'da = dataadapter
In my datagridview I was fill in using join tables (table1 = pr_employees, table2 = pr_employee_deduction). My problem now is during save button I want to update records from table2 only.[code]
We are presently developing an application, let's call it APP1, which uses a SQL Database which have about 800 stored procedures, 600 tables, etc. APP1 was originally created in order to replace another application, APP0, from which we do not have source code but only SQL tables, Stored Procedures, views, etc. Previous programers of APP1 used some DB objects from this same database and added some other objects specific to APP1 because it becomes bigger than APP0. And we do not need APP0 anymore as APP1 does all what we want, and more.
So, now, we are thinking about a way to find out which objects are used by APP1 in order to remove objects which are ONLY used by APP0.What is the best approach to discover all objects used by APP1 without having to open every single class and form?
Once we will have a complete list of these objects, it will be easy to use a program we bought which detects all dependencies for all SQL Objects specified directly from SQL and remove objects which do not return from any dependencies. Any ideas of how I could get this list without having to go through all our program that have many, many, many classes and forms?
Note : I know, in a perfect world, all calls to PSs and tables should be in a DAL but in the case of the application we're presently working on ... this is not our case! Yippy! (sarcastic yippy) ;)
Note 2 : This application is not using any ORM. So all queries are directly using SqlCommand. So any call to any DB objects are in string format.
I remember we were taught BASIC (Beginner's All Purpose Symbolic Instruction Code) language in school, when we were in 5th grade. It was purely in DOS-Mode and we basically used it for drawing. Then I learnt Visual Basic 6.0 quite a few years basic. I neve found a similarity between them
I have two tables which need to be connected using a one-to-one relationship. In SQL Server 2005, how would I add this relationship to the database diagram, do I just leave the relationship blank? Is there any pre requisite queries I have to add? How do I connect these tables in VB? .. the same way I would connect a one-to-many?I need the Student table to be linked to the Class Table where One student can be in only 1 class.
My issue involves relationships and cascaded effects between properties, and I'm wondering what best practices are on this.I have a class that contains a list of varying length of numbers. When editing the list, sometimes the user prefer to set a TargetSum, so that the program enforces the list will always add to this sum. I am accomplishing this by programmatically setting the final element in the list such that list sum = TargetSum. For example, if the user chooses to UseTargetSum, then sets TargetSum = 10, then creates a list of length 4, and enters 1, 4, 2 for the first 3 elements, then the final element is programmatically fixed to 3. The user cannot change the final element themselves.
I do this behind the scenes by handling all necessary events, such as a list element value change, list length change, and the UseTargetSum option change. For each event trigger, it recalculates the last element's value.It works but then there was a bug when loading saved data. If a list is loaded by sequentially adding the elements, the handlers modify each entry. Regarding the example, when the first value of 1 is entered, the handlers say "a value was just added, the sum should be 10, there is currently only one element, so it needs to be 10". So the first element gets changed to 10 behind the scenes. When the second element is next added, the handlers say "a value of 4 was just added, but the first element is already 10, so it should be zero." At the end of the load, the final list reads 10,0,0,0 instead of 1,4,2,3.
I know it is possible to rearrange the load procedure such that I get the correct list. For instance, I could avoid enabling the TargetSum event handlers until after all the data is loaded. The list would first be created as 1,4,2,3 and then the handlers would change nothing.
But this experience makes me wonder if I am opening the door for other sneaky side effects. It seems you should be able to load data without worrying too much about an implicit ordering. It also seems unusual to have "cascading" effects between class properties. Is there a more accepted approach?
The other alternative I'm considering is to only enforce TargetSum only inside UI forms. Ie, when you know it's a user making the change, then enforce the TargetSum, but otherwise leave the core class logic alone.That way database loads, etc, are left unaffected. But I guess the downside of not having ubiquitous enforcement is that opens the door of incorrect sums via some unforeseen complication.
I have made a small "front-end" application for an Access databasefile.
I set up 3 tables with relations in Access, and added the database as a datasource in my project. I have done no database programming, and the app has worked nicely for about 2 years. It's a simple master-detail form with 2 datagridviews dragged from the datasource window.
Yesterday I opened the project to add a new form. The form is just a "setttings form" with no database activities.
When I press F5 - the main form do not start, and I get the error message "DataMember property '{0}' cannot be found on the DataSource." - where the property name is the name of one of the 2 relationships in the datasource.
Im would like to create relationships between my tables from different database. im using VB 2008 and SQL 2008 as my database. Is the relationships should be made on my database itself or tru coding in my VB? If either which how can i do that.
If I a many-to-many relationship between Users and Roles and I have an instance of a User entity and several Role Ids can I insert a relationship between the two types of entities without having any other Role data and without doing a select on the Roles first? Update:
I might not have been clear enough. I don't have an instance of a Role, only the role id. Is it possible to create the relationship between User and Role without filling a Role object from the database first?
how F# is a language which allows you to approach problems in a different way than in C#/VB.NET, i.e. instead of "pushing bits around" you "chain together data transformations", and that how F# will "become like XML", something that you use in addition to your language of choice (C# or VB.NET) in order to solve certain problems in a more efficient way.This got me to thinking about the relationship of the .NET languages, here's how I understand them:C# and VB.NET are syntactically but not substantially different, i.e. a C# programmer would not learn VB.NET in order to "approach problems in a new way"however, a C# or VB.NET programmer would learn F# in order to "approach programming problems in a functional way"but what about IronPython and IronRuby? Chris mentioned that "F# learned a lot from Ruby and Python" so I would think that F# has a similar relationship to IronRuby/IronPython and C# has to VB.NET. However, a little googling around tells me that IronRuby and IronPython are both built on the DLR but F# is not.
How are the relationships between F#, IronRuby and IronPython to be best understood?
I'm using VS2008 with SQL Express 2010. I've a one to many relationship and a form with these two tables on. I'm using the BindingNavigator toolbar and when I press the + button, a new record appears. However, I have to press the save button and save the parent data (which is in Details view) before I can add any data to the child table (which is in a DataGridView). Once I've clicked save, then I can add child data no problem, then I click save again and all my data is saved.
Is there any way to save all the data at once? If not what is the best practice for telling the user when to save? Should I make the child data grids invisible until the user clicks save?
I'm new to both SQL Server Express and VB2008 Express or any other kind of language for that matter..I'm trying to create a form using a typed dataset created using the Data Source Configuration Wizard that contains two main tables and a third that creates a many to many relationship between the first two.Is this possible as when I examine the dataset in the Data Sources window, the middle table shows up as a related table under each of the main tables but neither shows a third related table.How can I show synced data from all three tables on my form. Is this possible using the Configuration Wizard or does it have to be done in code?
I'm trying to create a form using a typed dataset created using the Data Source Configuration Wizard that contains two main tables and a third that creates a many to many relationship between the first two.
Is this possible as when I examine the dataset in the Data Sources window, the middle table shows up as a related table under each of the main tables but neither shows a third related table.How can I show synced data from all three tables on my form. Is this possible using the Configuration Wizard or does it have to be done in code?
Is it possible to have a Foreign Key as the Primary Key?
<Key()> Public Property AssignmentID() As Integer <ForeignKey("AssignmentID")> Public Overridable Property Assignment As Assignment Public Overridable Property User As User
For the code above I get an error:One or more validation errors were detected during model generation:System.Data.Edm.EdmAssociationEnd: : Multiplicity is not valid in Role 'AssignmentLocks_Assignment_Source' in relationship 'AssignmentLocks_Assignment'. Because the Dependent Role refers to the key properties, the upper bound of the multiplicity of the Dependent Role must be �1�.
I'm trying to create a table which has one (or none) record per assignment.
The general problem is that I can't get the foreign key in one of my child tables to populate the primary key from the parent table. I have a parent table named "ISSUES" and a child table named "ISSDESC". The primary key for ISSUES is ISS_ID which is an autonumber. The foreign key is ISS_ID in the ISSDESC table which is just a number. I'm using MS Access and an OLEDBConnection as the method. I've created the relationship in MS Access and also created the datarelation in the VB.NET code.
