Generically Implement Exception Logging If I Have Already Got Many Try-catch Block?
Apr 20, 2012
I am writing ASP.Net Web-form in VB.
I have a system which have already handled exceptions by try-catch blocks everywhere.How do I quickly and generically implement exception logging like overriding something instead of inserting logging functions in every single catch block?
This is part of my block which handles incoming messages via TCP. Sometimes it sends scrambled messages which are unpredictable and i need a Try + Catch block for it:'
[Code]...
I can either get "Input string not in correct format" or "typecast not valid". But this is simply supposed to be routine to run into and be able to handle. but that stupid error message keeps popping up I've heard of JITDebugging, should I use that?
I am using VB.NET 2005 to create a Windows forms application. I have a procedure named SendMail that creates an instance of Outlook.Application, to send an email from my application. I found the code on this forum, I think.The procedure works fine, but I can't use error handling with it.I call the procedure from a button click event. I put the procedure call in a try/catch block, and the application won't build, with the following error.
Error 68 'Catch' cannot catch type 'Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.Exception' because it is not 'System.Exception' or a class that inherits from 'System.Exception'. C:datadevdmtiQTSQTSv7_1_20100212wQTSQTSReportsCriteria pt_frmReportViewer.vb 43 21 QTS
Here is the code:
Sub SendMail(ByVal sFile As String) ' Create an Outlook application. Dim oApp As Outlook._Application
This may be a debugger issue, but here goes:I have this piece of code:
Private Function Connect() As Boolean Try sessionBegun = False[code].....
My intention is to 'convert' the low level exception into something more meaningful, so I throw an exception of my own creation. I want this to bubble up to a place where I can handle it.However what is happening is my debugger breaks and tells me that an exception of type "QuickBooksConnectionException" was thrown.I know that, I just threw it, why are you catching it? From what I've read, this ought to work, and there doesn't appear to be an analogous Java throws keyword, so perhaps it is my debugger.
I'm getting 'Catch' cannot catch type 'Object' because it is not 'System.Exception' or a class that inherits from 'System.Exception'. and 'Expression detected' Code underlined in blue: Catch obj1 As Object When (?)
We have a current implementation of a log file manager where it's two main purposes are to 1. rename files generated by other programs with a date/time stamp so they create new ones, and 2. delete files older then X amount of days from a specified folder. The program also makes it's own log file which records when these events happen.Do you think the Logging Application Block would be useful in this instance? The old file manager is written in VB 6.0 and an upgrade to VB .Net would not take too long, but is it worth it to try and implement LAP into it?
I have a program in VB.Net that receives mails from Outlook, extracts attachments and inserts the attachments into a table through a query. I would like to put the query/queries in a Try/Catch block, but cannot do so as Outlook exceptions cannot be caught, and it gives me an error, and unless I put a very specific exception, I cannot catch it. Is there a workaround?
Edit:
Try Catch ex As Exception End Try
Exception is underlined and when I hover on it, it says: "Catch cannot catch type 'Microsoft.Office.Interop.Outlook.Exception' because it is not in 'System.Exception' or a class that inherits from 'System.Exception'". This is affecting all my other code which I'd like to put into a Try/Catch block.
I have this scenario: in a Sub I have a Try...Catch statement.Within that Try..Catch I call another sub.In that 2nd sub is also a Try...Catch.(see below for example).Now if an exception occurs in the 2nd sub's Try...Catch, which Catch gets excecuted? The 2nd one, the 1st one or both?
It is possible to catch an exception and throw a new exception which wraps the first exception as an inner exception: [URL] Also, if I call a function and it throws a certain error, but I catch it, will the calling code's catch handler execute? If so, and it is of a higher exception type, is this not wrapping the exception? eg I can throw exception ex of type IndexOutOfRange, log it but rethrow, catch a higher up exception and do something, or I can throw a new exception and wrap an inner exception like:
So I handle all exceptions in my project within my Global.asax page. For example, on a random page I could have:[code]So my question is in the Application_Error method, do I need the try/catch block when trying to write to the database? I'm thinking I would in case something goes wrong with the connection, etc. - but is this really necessary? Also, what would I do in the catch block if there is an error? At that point I would be catching the error of logging an error which is confusing in its own right.
I used VB.Net controls and LINQ to SQL to perform all Updates and Inserts, so when an error occurs I want to show "Enter Data Correctly", how do I do that once I catch an exception?
I have a simple function which tries to get a value from an Obout grid filter column, and if the value is empty, ignores it and moves on. For some reason this code ignore my catch block and always shows a System.FormatException when the input string is empty More bizarre, if I use visual studio's debugger and set a breakpoint on that line, the catch block functions normally (after I continue from that line). I have already confirmed that my Debug | Exceptions | CLR are not set to catch when thrown. I have also confirmed this same behavior in the production version.
I've tried to Google this problem, but haven't found any relevant results.I am trying to handle HTTP 500 errors when logging into a web service (the web service returns 500 when login is incorrect). An WebException is thrown, but I can't seem to catch it properly. The exception is highlighted in green instead of the normal yellow (having trouble finding info on this as well)
This is a followup question to this Should I stick with the Try/Catch/Finally construct, or go with the Using construct? Sample Code for Try/Catch/Finally:
We've created a little plugin to add a block of xml comment and create a try-catch to a function. (we simply add this to each and every function we write).But with the latest devexpress update I'm having a problem with the following code.[code].........
I am using ASP.NET 2.0. When i place a TRY CATCH block in my event it always go into the CATCH section, in my case it re-direct the page to Default.aspx. But if I remove the TRY CATCH block the code get's executed fine and it does what it suppose to.
CODE:
There is no error message when i place a break point by the "Catch ex As Exception" Am I reading the selectedRowIndex DataKey value incorrectly maybe?
I normally use the following for global error handling: Code: Dim currentDomain As AppDomain = AppDomain.CurrentDomain AddHandler currentDomain.UnhandledException, AddressOf MYExceptionHandler AddHandler Application.ThreadException, AddressOf MYThreadHandler I normally don't have a MDI application, and When I force an error, neither of the events get fired. I don't have anything in a try catch block. How do I do this with a MDI application?
I have a program in which users are entering numbers into text boxes. I'm checking for proper data entry using a TRY-CATCH block. It works great and delivers an error message if the users enter anything non-numeric.
The problem is that now I need the users to enter negative values, but the TRY-CATCH is seeing the negative sign as non-numeric.
I have a method as follows: Public Sub Send() Dim caughtException As Exception = Nothing Try //Attempt action. Catch ex As Exception //Custom exceptions which can be thrown all inherit from Exception. //Instantiate error object to be logged. caughtException = ex End Try //Log action and if there is an error log this too. If caughtException IsNot Nothing Then Throw caughtException End Sub
It is essential that I log the error for reports, which after research, rethrowing the exception is the right thing to do. What I am concerned about is preservation of stack information. In order to keep the code DRY I am logging the action in one place - after the exception has been caught. This functionality is ultimately exposed via WCF.
I'm writing a VB.Net app using SQL Server 2008. I want to use exception handling but it appears that the way to do that in SQL Server 2008 has changed. I've read about a configuration console to create an exception policy for my app. Where do I find this configuration console?