Is it possible to force the inherited classes to implement a set of New() constructors? I tried with this, but it doesn't work:
MustOverride Sub New()
MustOverride Sub New(Arg1 as Integer)
MustOverride Sub New(Arg1 as String)
I'm having trouble with CodeDOM and the VBCodeProvider.I want to generate an abstract class with a MustOverride ReadOnly Property.
View 3 RepliesI'd like to have a Private or Protected "Setter" for a property that also happens to be an abstract (MustOverride). I'm porting some code from C# to VB and in C# this is pretty straight forward. In VB not so much (for me anyway).
Some code...
In C#...
public abstract class BaseClassWithAnAbstractProperty
{
public abstract int AnAbstractIntegerProperty { get; protected set; }
}
[Code]....
The issue seems to be the inability to flesh-out the Get/Set specifics in the declaration.
VB.NET 2008 .NET 3.5 I have two base classes that are MustInherit (partial). Let's call one class OrderBase and the other OrderItemBase. specific type of order and order item would inherit from these classes. Let's call these WebOrder (inherits from OrderBase) and WebOrderItem (inherits from OrderItemBase).
Now, in the grand scheme of things WebOrder is a composite class containing a WebOrderItem, like so:
[Code]...