am trying to add an extra optional parameter to a property but it gives this message.Specifiers valid only at the beginning of a declaration. Public ReadOnly Property ReadValue(ByVal Selection As String, ByVal Key As String,Optional Default as string="") As String
I am retrieving several properties of a control. Here is how I used to retrieve properties (with pinfo of type PropertyInfo):
value = pinfo.GetValue(obj, nothing)
That worked well, but now I am facing a property that has a optional value, and I get an error message telling me that the number of parameters is incorrect. So I changed my code by this one:
Dim index As Object() = {Nothing} value = pinfo.GetValue(obj, index)
At this point, I didn't get any error message, but this code doesn't retrieve the good value. It only works if I replace Nothing by the default value provided by the property accessor...
But I don't know in advance what this default value is! And this code is within a function that retrieves properties that doesn't have optional values, so I cannot change the code especially for one case or another..
I am working on .NET 2.0
EDIT: More precisions about the case leading to the problem
Here is an example of property leading to the problem:
ReadOnly Property Foo(Optional ByVal Number As Integer = -1) As String Get If Number = -1 Then
[Code]....
With this kind of property, none of the codes above retrieve the good string.
My best guess would be to try the first code for general purposes, catch the appropriate exception, and then dynamically retrieve the default value of the parameter (Number in that case) and its type, so that I can call getValue with this default value.
So, How can I retrieve the default value of the optional parameter?
I am trying to develop a simple interface for allowing quick lists to be generated from classes. Basically, the interface needs to return an ID and a Name. However, some classes have a calculated name property which is read only, others just use a read/write name property. Basically, all I care is that it has a getter, it does not matter if the property has a setter. How can I write this interface to handle either or without throwing compile errors?
I have a custom Attribute class where the constructor takes one fixed parameter and two optional parameters. It is my understanding that one can supply one or more optional parameters by using 'named parameters' such as this:
Private Sub CallMethod() Me.OptionalMethod(-1, z:=1) End Sub
[code]....
Well, I thought, perhaps Attributes don't support named parameters. I know they can behave a little weird (they don't support all types in their arguments for example I think), so I thought little of it.But then... I noticed something else. If you take a look at my code of the attribute class again. Notice that I am using an attribute on that class as well... And what do you know: named parameters. Working just fine... The AttributeUsage attribute has the exact same configuration: one fixed parameter and two optional parameters. I seem to be able to call them using named parameters just fine, where I cannot call my own attribute constructor with named parameters...
I am taking in two html files and creating one out of them. To do this I am opening the first html file and not writing out the closing </body> and </html> tag and opening the second file and not writing out the corresponding opening tags, as well as the <style></style>section. I start a streamwriter, and write the lines out to it, and then close the streamwriter. My problem is that the output file is filled with strange characters. I've tried opening the streamwriter with different character sets as the third parm, but all this does is change the characters to different strange characters.It says charset=windows-1252 at the tops of the input files (and the output files for that matter - since I'm just reading stuff in and writing it out - with the exceptions mentioned above).Questions;First, do you think I am properly approaching appending two .htm files together?Second, how can I eliminate these strange characters.
I am trying to have an optional Date value in one of my sub but since you cant set Date to nothing, this doesn't work. And i cant set it to the Date.minvalue inline.
Private Sub abc (ByVal A As String, Optional ByVal B As Date = Nothing) End Sub
So, i went and set it to some date in the past.
Private Sub abc (ByVal A As String, Optional ByVal B As Date = #1/1/2001#) End Sub
what would be the proper way to handle the default value for an optional Date?
I have the following property in a property grid in VB.Net 2010.
<Description("Rapid Entry Post Car Wash Settings CarWashOptionPushButtons"), _ Category("Post Car Wash")> _ Public Property CarWashOptionPushButtons() As String
[code]....
I need to make this property a list box that gets the values from a database table and populates the list box with the values from the table. I have tried numerous things to no avail.
I'm trying to convert come vb.net code into C# from another programmers old work but came across optional in one of the functions.[code]...
It seems like instead of using overloading, VB.Net has an option to create it into one method/function. Does C# have a similar equilvalent or do I have to create a method for each possbility?
I have an application that does a search of our database (exposed via EF) for records meeting certain conditions. We have two main tables (Jobs and Recipients). Recipients are linked to the Jobs table by a Job ID.The job record has various fields (Process Date, NameJobType). The recipient has a lot of Name and ID fields (e.g. Account Number, Surname, etc)
I'm looking at an old module to add some new features. I noticed this in a subroutine declaration:sub foo(...,optional fum as integer = 0)the later if not isnothing(fum) then <do something>I'm wondering, will <do something> ever be executed? I'm guessing not, since fum has a default value, but I want to be sure I'm getting this correctly.
I have an application that does a search of our database (exposed via EF) for records meeting certain conditions. We have two main tables (Jobs and Recipients). Recipients are linked to the Jobs table by a Job ID.The job record has various fields (Process Date, Name, JobType). The recipient has a lot of Name and ID fields (e.g. Account Number, Surname, etc)I want to present a search screen where they see a list of fields to search on. The ASP.net code then sees which textboxes the user typed in (or selected), and builds a query based on that. [code] Where I'm stuck is figuring out how to add in additional where clauses. Should I just use Entity SQL?Can this return strongly typed EF objects as well? And is it possible to return both the Jobs and Recipients objects?
I have a method written in VB.NET. It looks like this:
Shared Sub SomeMethod(ByVal Id As Guid, Optional ByVal str1 As String = "foo", Optional ByVal str2 As String = "")
I want to call this method from C# 3.0 and I want it to use its default arguments. I tried passing System.Reflection.Missing.Value, but I cannot cast it as String. Is there any way to do that?
However, I am wondering if there are any workarounds or plans for incorporating this feature into VB.NET in the future?What I'd like to do:
Public Delegate Function Deserializer(Of T)(ByRef Buffer() As Byte, optional ByRef BufferPosition As Integer = 0) As T 'Implementation of a func that matches the delegate' Class A Public Function Deserialize(Byref Buffer() as Byte, optional Byref BufferPosition as integer = 0) ....
In the absence of specifying "optional" inside the actual delegate itself, it'd at least be nice to be able to do it in the function implementation only:
Public Delegate Function Deserializer(Of T)(ByRef Buffer() As Byte, ByRef BufferPosition As Integer) As T 'Implementation of a func that matches the delegate' Class A Public Function Deserialize(Byref Buffer() as Byte, optional Byref BufferPosition as integer = 0) ....
At least this second way, the functions for the delegate will always have a value mapped to each parameter, although some may come from the function side and not the calling side.
I tried DbNull.Value but no luck. How do I assign a default value as null to a string parameter that is null in VB.NET? Its litte strange to see that VB does not have anything like plain null as most of the other languages do. Also what is the difference between null and DbNull and Nothing.
What is the standard way to implement optional query parameters in a .NET WinForms application?In other words, only query on a field if the value of a corresponding control is not null.
EDIT: I use a FillBy method which calls a query in my Access database. In the TableAdapter query editor, I just used WHERE (field1 = ?) AND (field2 = ?) ... I just can't find the "hook" to bind form controls to the table adapter query parameters and so that if a form uses the default value to not query on it.
I have some fix fields in my database but user can add some another fields to my database if s/he needs. How can I insert data to this kind of fields if there are? For fixed fields I have used the follow cods
Dim rs As New OleDb.OleDbCommand( "INSERT INTO Wind_Parameters (ID, Name, CrX, CrY) VALUES ('" & ID &
[Code]....
But I can't add optional fields to this code. I think I should use UPDATE syntax for fill optional fields after running this cod but I couldn't find correct syntax for it in visual basic 2010
When the optional field 'Questions1' is inserted into the form I get the value 'true' by the IsNode() function.
If the field it is not inserted I have an exception stating that the reference is not correct (and it is indeed true). Is there a way to verify about a node, whether it is present or not in my form?
Is there a way to pass an optional parameter to a webservice, instead of having to overload the method?If the webservice user is accessing the webservice directly, I want to do ActionA, if the user is accessing the webservice through my web interface, I want to do ActionA + ActionB.
I am getting this error when debugging a VB application. The method that is being called when I get this does not have any arguments. Definitions in code are as follows with names changed to protect the guilty
[Code]...
The question is, if the method is not defined to accept argments, then why am I having a debug assertion while debugging that says that the arguments are not optional?
I have an Image.OCX which is build on 2008. This is used by VB Application.Many OCX methods are not used in Application. I want to delete unused method from OCX.Step for method deletion.
Delete exists Method from .ODL File i.e //[id(181), helpcontext(11)] long CreateImage(ID id);. Delete CreateImage same function . Delete //DISP_FUNCTION(CImageCtrl, "CreateImage", CreateImage, VT_I4) from Ctrl.cpp. Delete interface ID from AFX_DISP_ID.
[code]....
Following Error Message display "Run Tim error '449':Argument not optional."
let me know is that possible to delete exist method from OCX and How?
I can't figure out the syntax for having an optional byte array in a .net sub Public SubMy Function(ByValFilename as String,OptionalFileData as Byte())The optional keyword requires me to set a default value - which is understandable, but I cannot figure out the syntax to do that here. Public Sub MyFunction(ByValFilenameasString,Optional FileData as Byte(){0})