Asp.net Mvc - Equivalent Of [Bind] In Vb
Jul 11, 2011Is there an equivalent to C#'s MVC [Bind(Include="Title,Description")] in VB?
View 1 RepliesIs there an equivalent to C#'s MVC [Bind(Include="Title,Description")] in VB?
View 1 RepliesI have a form called studentForm which has a studentCombobox, studentTextbox and a studentDatagridView
In the constructor of the studentForm I need to bind studentCombobox to the StudentbindingSource of the main form and to bind studentDataGridView to appropriate binding source in the mainForm.So that this datagrid view displays all the bookings for the studentID currently selected in studentComboBox
studentComboBox.DataSource = MainForm.StudentBindingSource
studentComboBox.DisplayMember = "StudentID"
studentDataGridView.DataSource = MainForm.StudentDataSet
studentDataGridView.DataMember = "Names "
This is the code I wrote in the constructor
I am trying to bind my SQL param's qurey to bind to a table. My problem is i get this error "Fill: SelectCommand.Connection property has not been initialized."
Protected Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
If RadioButton3.Checked = True Then
Dim connectionGrid As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection("Data Source=BST;Initial Catalog=dsfs;uid=dfsdf; pwd='dsfsf'")
Dim commandgrid As SqlCommand = New SqlCommand()
[code]....
I'm currently developing an application with a reasonably complex DataGridView that allows the user to build the lines of a sales document: Quantitiy, Description, Price, etc with some additional fields to help calculate price based on cost or discount i'm sure you get the jist - all this means we're not just diplaying data but adding and manipulating it - It also means there's mainly decimal fields, nit just simple text fields
Now, i'm new to VB.net, so i've perhaps done things a bit backwards during my learning curve, namely designing and coding my DGV before creating the underlying database table and binding to it - so as i'm sure you can image there's a bit recoding to do to allow for the fact that it's now bound to a datasource.
I'd got the DGV working just how a wanted it to, but now that i've bound it to a datasource i'm hiting multiple problems with: Formating the appearance of figures in the DGV Problems with blank fields while enering data (before the i try to save the data back to the database) How the DGV is functioning - it seems to behave differently when adding lines to a new sales document than it does when adding lines to an existing sales document
And given that when saving edits to an existing line i need to provide a valid update command i'm begining to think that it might be easier to scrap the databinding altogether and just Select, Add and Edit the database with code rather than binding the DGV in the IDE
I've read various threads about avoiding databinding due to it's limitations, but i've also read that it's far better in later versions of Visual Studio and .net. and i'm using VS2010
I'd just like some advise as to whether my gut feeling is right or whether i should persevere with databinding the DGV. i've noticed some quirks of databinding while working with other controls such as text and combo boxes, but i've overcome these and the result seems to be easier than coding the data transfer manually.
But i'm really struggling with databinding the DGV and the fact that i'm dtatbinding to a seperate table to the rest of the controls is leaning me away from databinding
I know that AndAlso is equivalent to && and OrElse is equivalent to ||. But what is the cleanest way to achieve the equivalent of Visual Basic's And and Or in C#?For example, consider the following VB.NET code.The ValidateForControl method performs some validation and returns whether the state of the specified control is valid. The entire input form is valid if all controls are valid. However, each control must be individually validated even if one is invalid (which requires the operator not to short-circuit). Visual Basic's And operator is perfect for this situation, but unfortunately there's no equivalent operator in C# as far as I know (&& short-circuits).
[Code]...
I am Validating a TextBox on it's KeyPress Event in VB.
VB.Net
If InStr("0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz`~!@#$%^&*()_+|[]{};:<>/?,.'" & """" & Chr(8), Chr(KeyAscii)) = 0 Then KeyAscii = 0
What will be it's equivalent in C# ?
Let me know how can i use this Err in c#.This is VB Code:
If Len(sPart1) <> PART1_LENGTH Then
Err.Raise(vbObjectError, , "Part 1 must be " & PART1_LENGTH)
[code]......
What I am trying to do is to check if a value matches one of two numbers (and easily be able to add to the numbers to compare to). Rather than doing a longer-winded way such as: [Code] I have found that this only works when SectionID is 2 or PageID is 8. If SectionID is 3 or PageID is 12 then it doesn't work. Why is this and what can I do to try to get around the problem?
View 3 Replieswhat is the equivalent for OLE in .net
View 1 RepliesI'm normally at home in C#, and I'm looking at a performance issue in some VB.Net code -- I want to be able to compare something to the default value for a type (kind like C#'s default keyword).
[Code]...
I am relatively new to Visual Basic. When it comes to logging, in Java I use log4j for logging.What is the equivalent in Visual Basic and can you please guide me to a good tutorial?
View 1 Repliesprivate bool txtRegExStringIsValid(string textToValidate)
{
Regex TheRegExpression;
string TheTextToValidate;
[code]....
I've got a large codebase which I'd like to expose to plugin authors to allow them to use VB.Net Express to code plugins for a server app, which is not available to them. My problem is that even with obfuscation, I'd rather not distribute the complete app and/or dlls, as even with obfuscation peeling apart a .NET assembly and puzzling out code is relatively easy to do. I'm interested in this because the licensor I obtain the code from requires me to protect IP and assets and while distributing .NET apps opens up the app to disassembly, keeping the server app private and allowing users to utilize a skeleton dll to code against is a happy medium.
What I'm looking for is some way or a utility to go through my server app source code and create a codeless version of the app which only contains method and property signatures.The intent is to provide a stub .NET dll for them to add as a reference and code against as if they were directly interacting with the server, without actually providing the server code to them, compiled or not. I can of course do this by hand but there are over 90 classes and hundreds of thousands of lines of code I'd rather not spend a week hand tweaking. Also, this presents a problem whenever new methods or code are added to the project. Finally, two separate projects is an even worse scenario.Because people will post suggestions that have little or nothing to do with the question, here's a short, clear example. I want to turn this class:
Public Class MyServer
Public ReadOnly Property Name() As String
Get
Return "Whatever"
[code].....
What is the vb.net expression of this c# expression ?
Frame.GetController<ShowNavigationItemController>().CustomShowNavigationItem += new EventHandler<CustomShowNavigationItemEventArgs>(WindowController1_CustomShowNavigationItem);
I'm looking at some old ASP code that contains the following:
Set objDSE = GetObject("LDAP://RootDSE")
Set objSysInfo = CreateObject("adsysteminfo")
Set objUser= Getobject("LDAP://" & Replace(objSysInfo.UserName,"/","/"))
dtmValue = objUser.PasswordLastChanged
[code]....
This is for an intranet app that uses integrated authentication. Is there a replacement for the ASP adsysteinfo object? I can probably port most of the LDAP calls using System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry, but is there a better/easier way to do this in ASP.NET (VB.Net or C#)? how to convert the ASP object properties to DirectoryEntry properties?
I have made an application in vb6 abd now trying to do the same in visual studio 2005. In vb6 i was using MSFlexgrid and its .Textmatrix properties. Would like to know what is the .Texmatrix equivalent for .net. When i pasted the code form vb6 i get the following error...
'TextMatrix' is not a member of 'AxMSFlexGridLib.AxMSFlexGrid'
What is the equivalent of Program.cs in VB.NET WinForms application?I need to move my .CS app to VB.NET.
As I do not have forms in my WinForms project in Program.cs I do the following:
Application.Run(new MyForm(parm1, parm2);
How to move this code in VB.NET?
In .net (c# or vb) expressions, how would you implement SQL's handy IN() functionality?i.e. value in (1, 2, 4, 7)rather than:
value = 1 or value = 2 or value = 4 or value = 7
There are obviously many ways, I'm looking for the most clean and simple!
Possible Duplicate: How do I specify the equivalent of volatile in VB.net? What is the VB.NET keyword equivalent of C# "volatile"? If there is no keyword what mechanism is the equivalent?
View 4 RepliesI do not know anything about PHP or Wordpress. But I was told Wordpress is very cool to use with PHP.
I use ASP.NET and would like to have a CMS for ASP.NET.
What is the best CMS to use for ASP.NET when cost is not an issue?
Does C# have an equivalent to VB.Net's DirectCast?I am aware that it has () casts and the 'as' keyword, but those line up to CType and TryCast.To be clear, these keywords do the following;CType/() casts: If it is already the correct type, cast it, otherwise look for a type converter and invoke it. If no type converter is found, throw an InvalidCastException.
TryCast/"as" keyword: If it is the correct type, cast it, otherwise return null.DirectCast: If it is the correct type, cast it, otherwise throw an InvalidCastException.
EDIT: After I have spelled out the above, some people have still responded that () is equivalent, so I will expand further upon why this is not true.
DirectCast only allows for either Narrowing or Widening conversions on inheritance tree, it does not support conversions across different branches like () does.ie: C#, this compiles and runs:
//This code uses a type converter to go across an inheritance tree
double d = 10;
int i = (int)d;
[code]....
i didn't want to trust this one to any number of online conversion websites that I often use.I don't need to convert the declarations, just the expression '(byte)((flen & 0xff00) >> 8)'in
byte[] sendFrameData = new byte[280
ushort flen
sendFrameData[7] = (byte)((flen & 0xff00) >> 8);
I want to progammically close a form, in VB 6 I used Form_QueryUnload 0, 0, on VB.Net (2008) MyForm_Closing 0,0 doesn't work?
View 4 RepliesThe code in C# is as follows:private void comboBox1_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
[Code]...
im using a quesry which returs the max value from a table the issue is the line cmd.ExecuteScalar() may return a value null if there are no records , is there any eway to chk if value returned is null or not?
View 2 RepliesAs I understand it Context menus are meant to replace the Popupmenu command as we knew it in VB6. This is fine if the menus are different than the existing main menu.Do I really have to re-create portions of the main menu for my context menus or can I somehow get the context menu to point to the main menu strip branch of my choice? (As in VB6.)
View 5 RepliesSchema is a string, lstSchemas is listbpb and rc is a variant
Schema = VB6.GetItemString(lstSchemas, rc)
In vb 6.0 when receiving data over a socket connection you used an event called dataarrival (winsock1.dataarival) to handle incoming data and process it. Is there an equivalent process in .net? i am unable to find it.
View 1 RepliesI am coding in VB.NET.
Currently, I am enclosing object initialization and usage in a Try/Catch block and then tear it down (dispose, close, set to nothing) in the Finally block. The problem is, a C# 'using' block is so easy to use and would clean things up in my code.
Is there a VB.NET equivalent? Or is my Finally block tear-down solution the only way?
I am trying to do the following...
VB
TextBox1.Left = 15
Me.Width = TextBox1.Right + 15
But the padding (of 15) is not the same on both sides. It seems like I need to be dealing with the VB6 equivalent of ScaleWidth.