Silverlight - .NET - Send Delegate Through The Classes To Set AddressOf?
Jan 11, 2010
How can I put AddressOf, from another class?I get this error 'AddressOf' operand must be the name of a method (without parentheses). "Is there an Eval () function in VB.NET? Or how does one do this?
Public Shared Property e As UserControl
Public Shared Sub SetButton(ByVal button As String, ByVal Objekt As [Delegate])
Dim errorbuttom1 As Button = e.FindName("errorButton1")
AddHandler errorbuttom1.Click, AddressOf Objekt
End Sub
I am using the EnumWindows API Call, and I've looked at an API website. It can't convert a Delegate (from AddressOf) to a Long, so I made a delegate type for it. (Uh-oh, already.) I need to know something that will take the returned IntPtr and get the window title, so I can activate it with another API call and send some keys.
Is there a way to create a delegate instance in .Net using CodeDom? I want to generate something which looks like the following:Dim myDelegate As someDelegateType = New someDelegateType(AddressOf implementingMethod)Below is more info on the context...Original Question:I am using CodeDom from the .Net framework (v3.5 if it matters) to generate a class. One of the classes defines a delegate method which in VB.Net looks like:Public Delegate Function filterByIdDelegate(ByVal obj As Object, ByVal id As Integer) As BooleanI then have a method which will provide the implementation:Private Function filterById(ByVal obj As Object, ByVal id As Integer) As Boolean Return (obj.ID = id)nd FunctionHere's the problem; how do you create an instance of the delegate (using the equivalent of AddressOf for VB.Net)? I am currently doing this (<filterByIdFunctionName> is a string holding the name of the delegate function, `' is the name of the delegate field):
Dim getFunction = New System.CodeDom.CodeMemberMethod() With getFunction 'Declare delegate instance
This is a mix of C# and VB.Net. I have a C# class with with 2 delegates: public delegate string GetSettingDelegate(string key); public event GetSettingDelegate GetSettingEvent; public delegate void SetSettingDelegate(string key, string value); public event SetSettingDelegate SetSettingEvent;
In a VB class I add handlers to the event: AddHandler _gisCtrl.SetSettingEvent, AddressOf SetSetting AddHandler _gisCtrl.GetSettingEvent, AddressOf GetSetting
When I try and remove the handlers: RemoveHandler _gisCtrl.SetSettingEvent, AddressOf SetSetting RemoveHandler _gisCtrl.GetSettingEvent, AddressOf GetSetting
SetSetting is OK but GetSetting throws a warning: The AddressOf expression has no effect in this context because the method arguments to AddressOf requires a relaxed conversation to the delagate type of the event.
Here are the methods [Code] ..... How to fix this and why it is thrown in the first place? The 2 delegates/events/methods look similar enough that I don't know why one is OK and one throws a warning.
Argument not specified for 'userList' of 'Private Sub OpenUserDetail(userList as Model.UserList)'. It works in the C# version just not sure about the C# to VB translation. Original declaration in C#:
private readonly DelegateCommand<EmailDocument> openMessageCommand; this.openMessageCommand = new DelegateCommand<EmailDocument>(this.OpenMessage); private void OpenMessage(EmailDocument document) { // Do stuff
GenerateTheList is function.Need help Private Sub buttGenerate_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles buttGenerate.Click Dim thread1 As New Thread(New ThreadStart(GenerateTheList)) thread1.Start() End Sub
I am a newbie in VB and I got a piece of code which can display the current running program. I need to use that in VB2005 and I got the below error message. Can anyone help how to fix it?[code]
I'm trying to convert a VB6 project to .NET, but I get problems with some callback functions, and the following message comes up: "AddressOf' expression cannot be converted to 'integer' because integer is not a delegate type" I've seen several solutions to similar problems like this, but I am not able to understand this issue with delegates.
After the conversion, the code look like this:
Declare Function vsmsgwSetDataPackageCB Lib "vsmsgwW.dll" (ByVal PACKAGE As Integer, ByRef arg As Integer) As Integer Dim arginitP As Integer
[Code]...
Which gives the error: Method 'Public Function PackageCB(HisNodeID As Integer, ByRef data() As Byte, ByVal length As Integer, ByRef arg As Integer) As Integer' does not have the same signature as delegate 'Delegate Function DelegatePackageCallback(hwnd As Integer, lparam As Integer) As Integer
I have user control which has one button. To handle click event of button I have added following code in usercontrol.
Public Sub ChangeClickHandler(ByVal [Delegate] As EventHandler)
[code]....
Now, I want to handle this click event where I call the this usercontrol. I call the usercontrol through reflection so I get the control in a form of object.
Dim button as object button.ChangeClickHandler(AddressOf mymethod), this line gives me error "'AddressOf' expression cannot be converted to 'Object' because 'Object' is not a delegate type."
from the documentation we have this: Multicast Delegate: Represents a multicast delegate; that is, a delegate that can have more than one element in its invocation list.
so am i right to say that Multicast delegate is no different from a normal delegate other than the fact that it has arguments. so System.Action is a 'normal' delegate whereas System.Action(T)(Byval obj as T) is a multicast delegate?
Code: Public Class SendPings Shared Sub New() AddHandler Post.Saved, AddressOf Post_Saved[code].....
I get a error" Method 'Private Shared Sub Ping(item As BlogEngine.Core.IPublishable, itemUrl As System.Uri)' does not have a signature compatible with delegate 'Delegate Sub WaitCallback(state As Object)'.
I have a LOB app written in VB.NET with a WinForms front-end and SQL back-end. After many months weighing up how to get onto the Web, I decided last month to use Silverlight 2. Now, Silverlight 3 Beta is out, but there is no end-user runtime.
Does anyone know when the runtime will be available for deployment of SL 3 apps onto client sites? My dev timeline is about 3 months: should I persist with SL 2 and then u/g to SL3, or jump straight in to SL3?
I am trying to write a VB.NET alternative to a C# anonymous function.I wish to call Threading.SynchronizationContext.Current.Send which expects a delegate of type Threading.SendOrPostCallback to be passed to it. The background is here, but because I wish to both pass in a string to MessageBox.Show and also capture the DialogResult I need to define another delegate within. I am struggling with the VB.NET syntax, both from the traditional delegate style, and lambda functions.My go at the traditional syntax is below, but I have gut feeling it should be much simpler than this:
Private Sub CollectMesssageBoxResultFromUserAsDelegate(ByVal messageToShow As String, ByRef wasCanceled As Boolean) wasCanceled = False
I have two classes, one nested in the other. [code]Neither "Name" or "ID" are unique between operations and records.I wish to construct a dictionary using LINQ = Dictionary(Of String, Of List(Of Integer), whereby the keys are uniqe examples of Names in my collection and the values are the collective set of distinct IDs that are associated with those names.
How can I structure my classes so that the user interfaces though a single class while the supporting classes are hidden from their view? I think its best understood in an example:
Public Class MyInterface Public Economic as EconomicClass Public Sub New() MyBase.New()
[code].....
So you might ask why am I even separating them? It's strictly for others who will be working with this interface. I need to funnel them though a logical structure:
This way everything is already handled for them in the background and they only need to run the method they need. I don't know if I can have it both ways in VB.NET.
I wish to check the hard drive space used in a folder on a hard drive. This will happen continuously as a service, so it will be calculating the space used for thousands of folders all the time. I know that this code can be done easily in dotnet, but it seems to take a really long time. Are there any APIs to do this more efficiently, or does the entire looping process have to occur to do this check?