I've written the following code which works fine.I'm wondering if there is not a simpler way of writing it to achieve the same?
[Code]...
I've not found any other way than using a Timer to have the status updated and the other actions done, as as soon as I start the thread, I loose control and "GetList_Button_Click" does not wait or control the thread.
The goal of using the thread is to not freeze the application and also adding a button to cancel the search in the future.
My understanding is that thread.join will suspend the execution of code on the calling thread until the spawned thread finishes or is aborted...
With that in mind, I tried this:
For i = 1 to 50 threads = New Thread(AddressOf test) threads.IsBackground = True threads.SetApartmentState(ApartmentState.STA)
[CODE]...
However, the rest of the code runs when the loop finishes, not waiting for all the spawned threads to finish. Since the rest of the code needs the threads to finish (otherwise the rest will error).
However, I get an error in the call to BeginInvoke (the UpdateApplicationDataUI portion of the delegate is stating "Expression does not produce a value").
Me.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(Function() New Action(AddressOf UpdateApplicationDataUI))
I'm creating a Client Server application which involves theServer running some scripts in clients and getting back results in an automated way. In Server, other than Main thread, i have 2 worker threads, a) one monitoring response from clients and b) the other scheduling next available job to respective client which executes that job. The issue here is ,I want these worker threads to write the status of their work in the UI(which comes under Main Thread). Also i need to write things in worker thread in a Data table and Rich Text Box in Main thread. But, I can't do so, since it has been blocked to access one thread's function or property directly from others. Is there any work around to do this?
I connected to the Informix server using RazorSQL, created a stored procedure and tested it, getting the expected answer, so the procedure exists in the database in some form.
I then run the following code:
If ConnectToInformix() Then Dim cmd As New IfxCommand("dc_routeHasOutstandingQuantity", conn) cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure
[Code]....
This error does not occur when calling the stored procedure from a live SQL connection.
I have a class that runs as a thread. While the thread is running, I want to call a method in that thread. I do this commonly where a thread calls a method in the GUI with a delegate. But I'm confused how to do this when the called thread is not the GUI and there are no parameters passed to the called method.
So, I'm having troubles implementing a separate thread. This is because I have a simple class, and in it I start a new thread. So, as it is not any form, I haven't found any way to make it call the function in the UI Thread.
So, I cannot use the Invoke method. Is there any way to call a function from another thread?
I am trying to call a method which has two parameters using thread. How can I do this? If I pass parameter to my thread.start() method, it is giving error.
Im trying to call a procedure to run into a thread..But this procedure requires two arguments. How can I pass these arguments in to the function when the thread call:
Dim myThread As New Threading.Thread(New Threading.ThreadStart(AddressOf PopulateTermList myThread.Start()
addressof PopulateTermList should only be called without parenthesis(the VB tells me this)
I want to add a parameter to my thread call here is the code. I want to call th.Start(True, sender.Text) and Count(ByVal isRunning As Boolean) will then become Private Sub Count(ByVal isRunning As Boolean, Byval strID As String), but I can't do that. So how can I make this thread accept 2 parameters?
Private Sub btnStart1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles btnStart1.Click th = New System.Threading.Thread(AddressOf Count) th.Name = "Button1" th.Start(True) [Code] .....
I have a few classes. One of the classes handles everything to do with updating controls (Such as adding items to a listview, etc.) and another is handling loops. I'm trying to add something to a richtextbox from another thread.[code]..
I have a 3 functions that should be called in order, that I want to do this in a thread say about 20 for each argument I pass. So for example
sub process_work(arg) result1= function1( arg ) result2= function2(result1 ) result3= function3( result2 ) listview.items.add( result3 ) end sub
How do I call this sub and pass to thread on button click. Is it possible to spawn new thread it I pass argument to this sub and the current or last one is busy?
i got a background worker that has the following code in the do work.... one of the things i want to do is to add rows if theres none available ...but i got an error saying i need to do a safe call thread...i already read about it but im stuck i put control.invoke, but that gives me an error too saying Error 1 Reference to a non-shared member requires an object reference.
I am trying to make a thread-safe call to a button on another form and I cannot figure out how to do it.I have read all of the MSDN documentation on thread-safe calls .
I'm calling a class function in a thread function. I'm using invoke method to send a value to a progressbar in the main form and I don't know how to do that in an other class function called by the thread function.
My goal is to send a value to a progressbar to the main form from the thread function and even from the function called by the thread function.
My code: ' Invoke sub Public Sub UpdPgEvent(ByVal value As Integer) Me.pgFindEvent.Value = value
We have an ASP.NET application that queues some of its long-running operations (generating reports, for example) into the ThreadPool using System.Threading.ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem.
We run the ASP.Net application pool using a specific domain service account so that it can access remote resources, including files and databases. When the execution starts in the ThreadPool, the user identity of the thread is set to Network Service, which doesn't allow us to access the remote resources.The web application can be accessed by users in different countries simultaneously and the format of the data that we provide to each user is based on their culture settings (using the standard globalization settings in web.config). When the queued thread is started, it has also lost this information and reverts to the default culture for the operating system.
Now, we can probably get around most of these issues by capturing the current user identity and culture in a state object and passing that to the background worker, then impersonate the user and set the culture on the thread, but this seems like a very "unclean" way to resolve this issue.[code]...
i got a background worker that has the following code in the do work.... one of the things i want to do is to add rows if theres none available ...but i got an error saying i need to do a safe call thread...i already read about it but im stuck i put control.invoke, but that gives me an error too saying Error1Reference to a non-shared member requires an object reference.what can i do to add rows safely?
vb.net Private Sub BackgroundWorker2_DoWork(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.ComponentModel.DoWorkEventArgs) Handles BackgroundWorker2.DoWork If DataGridView2.Rows.Item(num).Cells.Item(0).Value = "" Then Control.Invoke(DataGridView2.Rows.Add(1))
I'm going to level with you -- although I heard someone say a long time ago "Never use it"! -- and it stuck with me, if I didn't have this in my form load code, my program wouldn't work.Because, to be completely honest, I could never get my head around the issue regarding the serial port and using delegates. (Haven't given up though).
Anyway, the software works absolutely fine with this statement BUT I get a several errors without it based on that "separate threads" thing (to put it in hillbilly terms). is it still "Never use it"? or am I not alone, and some of you have also used "check for illegal cross threads = false"
I have a function in a module that returns a datatable.I need to call that function asynchronously and get the results in the Main thread (Main Form) in vb.net.
i have a notification j-query plugin .. i taste it in my page (working 100%)but when i want to use it in a event SqlDataSource1_Deleted with the response.write method it does not work
Protected Sub SqlDataSource1_Deleted(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.Web.UI.WebControls.SqlDataSourceStatusEventArgs) Handles SqlDataSource1.Deleted Response.Write("<script type='text/javascript'> showNotification({message: 'This is a
How do I dynamically call a function with delegates by passing a string to a background thread in VB.NET?
Currently my code is this
Public Sub invertImageBK(ByVal image As Bitmap) Dim snxl As System.ComponentModel.BackgroundWorker = createBW() snxl.RunWorkerAsync(New ImageProperties(image.Clone, "invertImage", Nothing))
This code was posted in Chit Chat and everyone is saying how great it is. I just have Visual Studio 2010 and no familiarity with VB6 so I thought it would be good to convert the code to Visual Basic 2010.
I've been able to write a thread into my app which basically does a loop in the background perfroming detection for a device being added or removed.works great!i am trying to implement another thread to check for a file on the found device...but i still haven't figured out threading enough to make this work, the versions i try to implemt are either looping along with the initial loop or cancelling itself because its already running.i've been trying to put a variable in that would switch the thread off, but it doesn't seem to work.
is it ever possible to write locking-features(for threading) with the language itself (this question is purely academic, I know no one will ever do it even if its possible (not me))?
A) In Java, is it possible to write thread safety functions with java alone, but without using any of the provided classes/language elements/syntax which offer this feature?
B) In C#, is it possible to write thread safety functions with C# alone, but without using any of the provided classes/language elements/syntax which offer this feature?
C) In Vb, is it possible to write thread safety functions with Vb alone, but without using any of the provided classes/language elements/syntax which offer this feature?
what is wrong with my code and I get no feedback from my button click event, i have imported. ( code Below) and i have tied differrent combinations of the code without sucess.maybe add extra to my code for the list to show open Port or closed ports.
I'm trying to write a program to call Quickbase and retrieve a database and put it into an array. It's a contacts table that I need to be able to query and select different fields according to letterheads, memos, etc. I've tried to do this three different ways.
1.) Find a direct port or some way of accessing Quickbase directly, similar to connecting to an oracle database or MS Access.
2.) Export the table to MS Excel and read the data from a spreadsheet.
3.) Opening a web browser in a background processes and login to the Quickbase account, then navigate using the little XML knowledge that I have.
I just can't find a good way to do this. Any ideas or can give some help on the code to do any of the ideas?
In one application, I need use 4 simultaneous threads.When the threads finished, I need to update the text of a TextBox.So, I create 4 Textbox, and I wanna the threads change the text to FINISHED.Each thread change one distinct TB.I use this "example"
Dim Terminados As Integer = 0 Private Sub frmEnviarMensagem_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load Timer1.Enabled = True Timer1.Start()
[code]....
The problem is, I have an error in the red lines.The error is: INVALIDOPERATIONEXCEPTION "Cross-Thread operation not valid: Control tbPlaca1 Accessed from a thread other than the thread it was created on."I don't use cross threading. Each TB only was accessed for the correspondent thread, and for the "main program".
i am asking that can i use c# language to implement "actions" fired on "click side events" such as mouse over the reason for this stupid question is that i remember some syntax of registering functions for particular events of formview, which are call when the event occurs (yes there ispostback involved" is something like the above possible for client side events using c# or even vb.net
