where the VS debugger refuses to show certain field types including dates.My call stack contains FunctionA which calls FunctionB. FunctionB has about 45 parameters and many of them are dates.When I step into functionA,
1. the debugger refuses to show a date variable when you hold the mouse over it. It just shows {Date} instead of a value
2. If you do quick watch on that same variable, it also just shows {Date} instead of a value
3. If I do ?variablename in the immediate window, I get "System Error &H80131c23&"
When I comment out the call to functionB, the date variables all show correctly in all the above methods. I will stress that the code has not yet reached functionB, just its very existence in code screws up the debugger.I'm thinking this is a memory issue and maybe vs debugger can't cope with a huge function stack frame dataspace.devenv is only using 268Meg of ram on a 2Meg box, with not much else running. Thats reasonable for this size of project.
I just recently had to rebuild my development environment from scratch. I've noticed that when I'm in debugging mode and I have a breakpoint set on a Procedure or Function, instead of stepping into that P or F, it just executes it without actually stepping thru the code. What do I need to change in my "Tools" and "Options" area?
I've reviewed the other posts regarding this subject. I'm using VB from Excel and the function keys are not working. I'm running Windows Vista Home Premium with Office Ultimate 2007 Looks like Excel is running VB 6.5So, this used to work for me...I've used the debugger quite a bit. When I try the solutions suggested Tools->Options->Keyboard (after checking check-box to show all settings) when I click on the box just below "Apply the following additional keyboard scheme" the only item in the list is default. There is no selection for VB 6 or anything else for that matter.
is there a way to get the GET parameters and POST parameters in just one function or Collection in ASP.NET? Like using $_REQUEST in PHP? I'm using VB.NET.
I'm currently working with a client's VB.Net code, which was developed for them by a small development shop a few years ago and which they purchased and have been maintaining and uprgrading since. This client's primary developer is out on indefinite (likely permanent) medical leave and I'm now filling in until they bring in a full timer (as I'm a contractor here). My current task is to add some functionality to a the VB.Net code they purchased. I'm finding practices and techniques in the code that absolutely baffle me and can't make the code do what I want. I'm starting to wonder if it's me and was hoping to get some thoughts on the code I've encountered.
For example: Setting a variable to accept the result of a function by calling the function with many parameters, clearing the parameters in the function, setting them to some value, calling another function with those new values, then never using the values returned by the functions. I'll add a code snippet in the first comment since this is already getting long.
When using the visual studio 2008 debugger with c# i can right-click on a variable and choose "Make Object ID" which allows me to watch that object (via it's ID) regardless of whether it is in the current stack frame or not.
When the debugger is in VB code, (doesnt matter if it's run from a c# unit test or a vb unit test) That option isn't there. Where did VB put this feature? Or does it simply not support it like so many other helpful c# features?
i want to get all available midi device by name. i found this: Declare Function midiOutGetID Lib "winmm.dll" (ByVal hMidiOUT As Integer, ByRef DeviceName As String) As Integer
I'm writing a VB.NET function with a ton of overloads. I've seen that most .NET functions have parameter descriptions in IntelliSense. For example, when typing in String.Compare(, IntelliSense says Compares two specified System.String objects and returns... you get the idea. This description changes and you click through different overloaded versions of the same functions. When you start typing in something for a parameter, it describes the parameter you're currently inputting as well. Example: strA: The first string to compare..
I have to create a program that finds the total cost for pizza, fries, and soft drinks, and places that in a list box. So far, though, I'm stuck. I have this code so far:
Public Class frmBill Private Sub btnTotal_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, [Code] .....
The errors that I am getting are: "Argument not specified for parameter 'D' of Public Function totalBill(P As Double, F As Double, D As Double) "Argument not specified for parameter 'F' of Public Function totalBill(P As Double, F As Double, D As Double) "Argument not specified for parameter 'P' of Public Function totalBill(P As Double, F As Double, D As Double)"
i am using XML as database, so updating or inserting diffrent XML's currently i am manage a seprate class for seprate XML file, this process consuming my lot of time, i want to create a genrelize class. currently according to the XML need i am sending two, three, four or five parameter in my function.
now i want to send array of the parameter to my function, so becoz of this thing i could mange all of my functions via a single class...
i am sending u the example what currently i use now...
Public Function Update(ByVal Item_ID As Long, ByVal ProductName As String, ByVal Price As Long, ByVal Path As String) As Long Try
Can we pass parameters to a function using delegates
Private Sub UpdateLabel(byval text as string) If Me.Label1.InvokeRequired Then Me.Label1.Invoke(New MethodInvoker(AddressOf UpdateLabel)) Else Label1.Text = text
I need to convert the following C# code to VB.NET:
public bool TryGetRewriteMatch(UrlContext url, out RedirectMatch match) { // NOTE: Normally this would use regular expression matches, cached database
[Code].....
However, I need to reference Url and ProductID in the function and I don't know how to pass them as parameters or get their values from the original function.
What is the preferred method of adding the current date/time into an SQL Server table with INSERT Command and executenonquery? I'm expecting something like ...
Suppose I have a function that accepts a string as parameter. But the parameter has a limited number of values (i.e. I've defined the function to work with only say, four exact strings). What I want is that when the user types the name of the function and starts the parentheses, the intellisense will show up giving the values that are defined in the function. Its just like a function that accepts a boolean parameter. The intellisense shows up giving the two values "True" and "False" when using the function.
what exactly is the type of the second argument of CType
CType(testobject, Control)
what exactly is Control? how can Control be used as though it is an expression?i nid to know this because i'm trying to build a function that takes the exact parameters of CType, let's call it CType2public function CType2 (byref object as Object, byval thetype as Type) as Object problem is when i do this: CType2(testobject, Control) they give me "Control is a type and cannot be used as an expression".
I'm program to handle ftp multiple file transfers. What I had in mind was to create an array for each type of file I need to process. There are 8 file types each needs to be transferred to a unique host.
' Each array contains in order: FILENAME|SOURCE PATH|DESTINATION PATH|HOST|USERNAME|PASSWORD Dim arrA() As String = {"*a*.dat", "/destpath1/", "host1", "id", "pass"}
I'm currently invoking a function that takes ByRef parameters using Control.Invoke (which I notice specifies the Object parameter array to be ByVal) but the array of parameters I give it isn't updated by the function. Is this possible with VB.Net 2003 or must there be some error in my code?
My program uses parameters from the calling program in this format parameter1/parameter2/parameter3 parameter2 is a datafile path which may sometimes have a space like : C:Program Files est company
I did this as a work around Sub Main(ByVal Args() As String) dim cArgs as string="" Dim J As Integer For J = 0 To Args.Length - 1 cArgs = cArgs & " " & Args(J) Next And then used the string split function. Is there a proper way to work with spaces?
I have a search function de build.We are using pure ASP.NET w VB.NET We have multiple DropDownLists and we're building a search query with whatever was selected in those DDLs. My question is, how can I handle the blank values (unselected dropdownlist values) with the SQL Query ? I'm using AND operators in the query so if anything is blank it'll fail the search. If the dropdownlist has no selected value, i don't want the value to be part of the search. It would be easy to code with just 2-3 parameters, but we're looking thru at least 10 items and doing a SWITCH CASE or multiple IFs would soon become mayhem.
I am creating a window that is a generic keypad for editing numerical values on a touchscreen. I would like to press an 'edit' button to create a copy of the keypad window/bring up a reusable version of the same window (I don't care), but pass in parameters: the old value I'm manipulating, and a title to be displayed above the number pad. I would like the user to be able to type in the new value, then press the 'done' key to submit this value and have it sent back to the main application window into my custom control that contains a text box.(I have the number pad's layout sorted out already; I'm already using a variation on it to set a global password 'access level'. It's getting the information in and out that has me scratching my head.) [code]
I'm writing a query to select all records that has any part of parameter. I have one table called Employees. Some people have name like this: John David Clark If the parameter is
[Code]....
I should be able to get result back as long as there's a match in the parameters. If I use Function Contains (q.FirstName & " " & q.LastName).Contains(employeeName), I will not get any result back if employeeName is "John Clark" Function Contains looks only for next words from left to right. It doesn't match a single word at a time. So that's why I used this in the Linq to SQL:
