.net - Events Subscribing Equivalent Of "+= Tab Tab" In C# VS IDE?
Dec 30, 2009
I wonder what is (if is) the "shortcut"(code-snippet) for adding handlers in VB.NET (Visual Studio 2005/08), equivalent to the += + Tab + Tab in button1.Click += ... C# IDE.In this way C# IDE auto-creates the necessary method, with all necessary parameters.So, If I know that I need to execute a method at a event even if I don't know the function implementation signature I do MyEvent+=TabTab and I just write the method's code.
So AddHandler button1.Click???I am asking about a object not (necessarily) linked with the Visual Studio Form's designer. Suppose my button is a private one in a custom class or is a button generated by some code, or, in general my button is a any object that implement an event..
I have been trying to implement the jQuery weekcalendar using .net. What I can't seem to figure out is why weekcalendar states events.events is undefined after I make an ajax call to a webmethod I created which returns JSON. Below is the relevant code:
I created a control that has picture box control docked within it. This control allows me to "animate" the image by swapping them out by setting the interval to swap them at. I want to use this control kind of like an animated icon within a application, but because the picture box is docked, the control I created won't respond to the events, MouseHover specifically. [Code]
I don't know how to use these events and get the appropriate values out of these events ....here is some code that I have copied from a website...
[code] Private Function MouseHookProc(ByVal nCode As Integer, ByVal wParam As Integer, ByRef lParam As MSLLHOOKSTRUCT) As Integer Try If nCode >= 0 Then Select Case wParam
I know that AndAlso is equivalent to && and OrElse is equivalent to ||. But what is the cleanest way to achieve the equivalent of Visual Basic's And and Or in C#?For example, consider the following VB.NET code.The ValidateForControl method performs some validation and returns whether the state of the specified control is valid. The entire input form is valid if all controls are valid. However, each control must be individually validated even if one is invalid (which requires the operator not to short-circuit). Visual Basic's And operator is perfect for this situation, but unfortunately there's no equivalent operator in C# as far as I know (&& short-circuits).
What I am trying to do is to check if a value matches one of two numbers (and easily be able to add to the numbers to compare to). Rather than doing a longer-winded way such as: [Code] I have found that this only works when SectionID is 2 or PageID is 8. If SectionID is 3 or PageID is 12 then it doesn't work. Why is this and what can I do to try to get around the problem?
is there a difference between shared events and non-shared events?
Private Shared Event EVENT_something_changed() Private Sub SUB_handles_something_changed() Handles Me.EVENT_something_changed End Sub
no errors with this code, but how is Me possible since the Event is shared. it seems like there's no errors between switching shared with un-shared and switching Me with Myclass, all 4 combinations seem to work, isn't that weird
I'm normally at home in C#, and I'm looking at a performance issue in some VB.Net code -- I want to be able to compare something to the default value for a type (kind like C#'s default keyword).
I am relatively new to Visual Basic. When it comes to logging, in Java I use log4j for logging.What is the equivalent in Visual Basic and can you please guide me to a good tutorial?
I've got a large codebase which I'd like to expose to plugin authors to allow them to use VB.Net Express to code plugins for a server app, which is not available to them. My problem is that even with obfuscation, I'd rather not distribute the complete app and/or dlls, as even with obfuscation peeling apart a .NET assembly and puzzling out code is relatively easy to do. I'm interested in this because the licensor I obtain the code from requires me to protect IP and assets and while distributing .NET apps opens up the app to disassembly, keeping the server app private and allowing users to utilize a skeleton dll to code against is a happy medium.
What I'm looking for is some way or a utility to go through my server app source code and create a codeless version of the app which only contains method and property signatures.The intent is to provide a stub .NET dll for them to add as a reference and code against as if they were directly interacting with the server, without actually providing the server code to them, compiled or not. I can of course do this by hand but there are over 90 classes and hundreds of thousands of lines of code I'd rather not spend a week hand tweaking. Also, this presents a problem whenever new methods or code are added to the project. Finally, two separate projects is an even worse scenario.Because people will post suggestions that have little or nothing to do with the question, here's a short, clear example. I want to turn this class:
Public Class MyServer Public ReadOnly Property Name() As String Get Return "Whatever"
What is the vb.net expression of this c# expression ?
Frame.GetController<ShowNavigationItemController>().CustomShowNavigationItem += new EventHandler<CustomShowNavigationItemEventArgs>(WindowController1_CustomShowNavigationItem);
I'm looking at some old ASP code that contains the following:
Set objDSE = GetObject("LDAP://RootDSE") Set objSysInfo = CreateObject("adsysteminfo") Set objUser= Getobject("LDAP://" & Replace(objSysInfo.UserName,"/","/")) dtmValue = objUser.PasswordLastChanged
[code]....
This is for an intranet app that uses integrated authentication. Is there a replacement for the ASP adsysteinfo object? I can probably port most of the LDAP calls using System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry, but is there a better/easier way to do this in ASP.NET (VB.Net or C#)? how to convert the ASP object properties to DirectoryEntry properties?
I have made an application in vb6 abd now trying to do the same in visual studio 2005. In vb6 i was using MSFlexgrid and its .Textmatrix properties. Would like to know what is the .Texmatrix equivalent for .net. When i pasted the code form vb6 i get the following error...
'TextMatrix' is not a member of 'AxMSFlexGridLib.AxMSFlexGrid'
Possible Duplicate: How do I specify the equivalent of volatile in VB.net? What is the VB.NET keyword equivalent of C# "volatile"? If there is no keyword what mechanism is the equivalent?
Does C# have an equivalent to VB.Net's DirectCast?I am aware that it has () casts and the 'as' keyword, but those line up to CType and TryCast.To be clear, these keywords do the following;CType/() casts: If it is already the correct type, cast it, otherwise look for a type converter and invoke it. If no type converter is found, throw an InvalidCastException.
TryCast/"as" keyword: If it is the correct type, cast it, otherwise return null.DirectCast: If it is the correct type, cast it, otherwise throw an InvalidCastException.
EDIT: After I have spelled out the above, some people have still responded that () is equivalent, so I will expand further upon why this is not true.
DirectCast only allows for either Narrowing or Widening conversions on inheritance tree, it does not support conversions across different branches like () does.ie: C#, this compiles and runs:
//This code uses a type converter to go across an inheritance tree double d = 10; int i = (int)d;
i didn't want to trust this one to any number of online conversion websites that I often use.I don't need to convert the declarations, just the expression '(byte)((flen & 0xff00) >> 8)'in
