I'm trying to create an extension method that returns an IEqualityComparer based on a lambda function. Heres the extension method:
<Extension()>
Public Function Comparer(Of T)(Func As Func(Of T, T, Boolean)) As IEqualityComparer(Of T)
Return New GenericComparer(Of T)(Func)
End Function
[Code]...
Why would I use an extension method instead of just creating non-extension sub or function?
For ex, I could have an extension function called IsNullOrEmptyOrAllSpaces on String, which does a check as its name implies. Or I can write a stand alone function that does the same thing. Other than having the extension show up in Intellisense, is there any advantage? Is a call to the extension quicker/more efficient than a call to a regular function?
I have a Direction Enum:
Public Enum Direction
Left
Right
Top
Bottom
End Enum
And Sometimes I need to get the inverse, so it seems nice to write:
SomeDirection.Inverse()
But I can't put a method on an enum! However, I can add an Extension Method (VS2008+) to it.
In VB, Extension Methods must be inside Modules. I really don't like modules that much, and I'm trying to write a (moderately) simple class that I can share in a single file to be plugged into other projects.
Modules can only reside in the file/namespace level so I have one in the bottom of the file now:
Public Class MyClass
'...'
End Class
[Code]....
It works, and "if it ain't broke, don't fix it", but I'd love to know if I'm doing it wrong and there's a better way with less boilerplate. Maybe in .NET 4?
Finally, I know I could write a structure that behaves like an enum, but that seems even more backwards.
I saw this post and I want to know if this is possible in VB. So like extension method, do extension properties exists in VB.Net? Here I've read they do, but cannot find any examples.
View 3 RepliesWrite an overload for every numeric type or if possible constrain a generic extension method to just numeric types.
View 2 RepliesI have the following in C#: public static void StartAnimation(UIElement animatableElement, DependencyProperty dependencyProperty, double toValue, double animationDurationSeconds, EventHandler completedEvent)
[Code]...
There are two ways to create methods on the fly. Through Anonymous method and through Lambda expression (relevant for C# language as far as i know). Though there is not much difference between them. How to create Anonymous methods in VB.NET ?
View 1 RepliesJust so it's known, this question is mostly academic, even though I tried to use the concept in a real-world solution. I realize the example is contrived, but I believe the concept is valid.I want to write some fluent code like this:
[code]...
I realize that I can't force an anonymous type into a specific type (like implementing an interface or some other class), and I don't want the overhead of defining a specific class just to match my desired fluent name with the actual method name. So I was able to make the code work like this:
copy(my_first_file).to.Invoke(my_second_file)So there is no IntelliSense or type awareness there, and I have to include the Invoke in order to have the method run. How can I get more type safety and exclude the Invoke method, under these constraints: Anonymous Type returned from Method No additional classes or interfaces Preferably, I do not want to pass in another parameter to the copy() method that tells what type to return, unless copy becomes a generic method (but I think that means defining another class/interface, which I don't want to do)
Extension methods are useful for types that you don't own and can't/don't want to derive from and extend (e.g. reference types and interfaces). Obviously, interfaces should be kept as short and to-the-point as possible, so extension methods for interfaces are particularly useful (e.g. LINQ).For classes, especially classes that you own, they're still useful - but I'm wondering how you determine what should be an extension method or what should be a method in the class itself.Personally, every time I think about it, I keep going round in circles with the following thoughts:If it's useful enough, it should be in the class.It's not part of the core responsibility of the class, it should be an extension method - but if it's useful enough, surely it should be the responsibility of the class...
View 3 RepliesCalling method in anonymous object?This works:
Call (New MyForm).Show
How would you convert this to VB (using .NET 4.0 / VS2010) ?
bw.DoWork += (o, args) =>
{
Code Here
};
I thought maybe like this:
AddHandler bw.DoWork,
Function(o, args)[code]....
But it says Function does not return a value on all code paths.
With C# anonymous delegates, we can avoid declaration of extra method, I know in VB.NET they're not available, but is there a design pattern that I can use so that I can avoid writing an extra method each time? I need it for SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges which will be used a lot of times in our code.
[Code]...
Imports System.Reflection
Public Class Test
Private Field As String
End Class
Module Module1
Sub Main()
Dim field = GetType(Test).GetField("Field", Reflection.BindingFlags.NonPublic Or Reflection.BindingFlags.Instance)
[Code]...
(using VB 08!) In order to avoid "magic strings", I have used this handy method (not my own!) many times to get a property's name as a string:
Function GetPropertyName(Of T, R)(ByVal expression As
Linq.Expressions.Expression(Of Func(Of T, R))) As
String
[Code].....
I found that this answer was asked and answered before VS2010 was actually released.[code]to a .NET Framework 4.0 project in Visual Studio 2010 and it does not compile.Do you now if this feature is really implemented and what I am doing wrong?
View 3 RepliesI am trying to create a new thread using an anonymous function but I keep getting errors. Here is my code:
New Thread(Function()
// Do something here
End Function).Start
Here are the errors I get:
New - Syntax Error
End Function - 'End Function' must be preceded by a matching 'Function'.
I have this code:
Public Sub Submit(
ByVal reasonId As Integer,
ByVal email As String,
ByVal message As String
)
'[Argument validation code here]
EmailController.sendMail(reasonId, email, message)
End Sub
I want to spin this off in a new thread so Submit() returns right after creating and start the thread.In C#, I could do something like this:new Thread(() => { EmailController.sendMail(reasonId, email, message)}).Start();
In my gridview I have fields for inserting a new record in the footer.In my objectdatasource selecting event if no records came back I bind a single mock row to force the footer to show so they can still add records. Since the row does not contain real data I hide the row.
...
If result.ItemCount = 0 Then
result = mockRow
AddHandler mygridview.PreRender, AddressOf HideRow
[code]....
This works fine. However, I'd like to condense it like this:
...
If result.ItemCount = 0 Then
result = mockRow
AddHandler mygridview.PreRender, Function() mygridview.Rows(0).Visible = False
[code]....
This compiles fine, but the row doesn't get hidden. why my anonymous function isn't getting hit?
After reading this post i realized that i cannot pass an anonymous type as a parameter to a function. So what other options do i have?
Perhaps, passing a Query.ToList as parameter would help, or am i re-inventing the wheel?
Update: I have the following query, which i would like to pass to a function:
Sub Test
Dim Query = (From c In DB Select New With { .ElementName = c.Name })
DoSomething(Query)
[Code].....
I know how to add extension method Like (Date.Now.MyExtensionFunction()),But I can NOT find how to add such methods and functions in class (not in module) with vb.net
View 3 RepliesI am trying to write extension methods in VB.NET
Imports System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Module ExtensionMethods
<Extension()> _
[code]....
But I am getting this error.Class 'System.Web.UI.WebControls.ListItem' cannot be indexed because it has no default property
What could be wrong?I am calling the code like this.
ddlSalesmanager.Items.FindByText(survey, StringComparison.CurrentCultureIgnoreCase)
P.S: I ported this wonderful code from C# to VB
I converted some code from c# for a VB.net project I have an object declared as this :
<Serializable()> _
Public Class oUserApplication
Public ApplicationID As Integer = 0
Public ApplicationRoleID As Integer = 0
[code]....
I ran into a strange issue over the weekend while I was working on an asp.net mvc project in vb.net. I created an extension method to convert an integer to the corresponding month it is associated with. I tested the extension method in a console application so I know it is working.
In my asp.net mvc project I have a view and want to call the extension method but I get an error that the extension method is not recognized. I imported the namespace it was contained in and still couldn't shake the error.
Extension Method:
Imports System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Module SiteExtensions
<Extension()> _
[Code].....
I want to implement an extension method in VB.NET that will clone an object of type T.Say, I want
Dim cust1 as New Customer() //...
Dim cust2 as New Customer() //...
cust2 = cust1.Clone()
[code]....
I created a module to add some Extension Methods to a Class. This Class inherits from another parent Class. In the code of my Extension Methods, I would like to refer to the base Class using MyBase. This doesn't seems to be allowed (Error message : "'MyBase' is not valid within a Module.")
[Code]...
I am starting to play with extension methods and i came across with this problem:In the next scenario i get a: "extension method has a type constraint that can never be satisfied"
Public Interface IKeyedObject(Of TKey As IEquatable(Of TKey))
ReadOnly Property InstanceKey() As TKey
End Interface
[Code]...
I've created a MyFunc extension (in Module Extensions) for all the base types as well as generic arrays, ICollection(Of T) and Dictionary(Of String,T):
Function MyFunc(Of T)(a() As T) As String
Function MyFunc(Of T)(collection As ICollection(Of T)) As String
Function MyFunc(Of T)(dict As Dictionary(Of String,T)) As String
[code].....
how do we access MyBase from an extension method?
i'm trying to extend a Sub called PassDown that would call the form's Base's OnPaint method
<Runtime.CompilerServices.Extension()> Public Sub PassDown(ByVal form_instance As Windows.Forms.Form, ByVal e As EventArgs)
MyBase.OnPaint(e)
but of course, mybase couldn't be accessed this way so is there an alternative?
Can I access values in application settings of web.config in extension method?I have the below code but it is not working:
<Extension()> _
Public Function DocCountExt(ByVal value As Collection) As Integer
Dim maxOffSet As Integer = Integer.Parse(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings(APP_SETTINGS_OFFSET))
return maxOffSet
End Function
The above code does not work.
i want to extend the integer class to a method that increments current integer value by 2. I create a console application and a second module which contains the extension method.
Imports System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Module StringExtensions
<Extension()>
[code]....
and everything works fine. The extension method module can be imported to any other project (Project-->add existing item --> select the vb file that contains the extension method module) and works fine too. But the code is accessible to other users. Is there a method to convert the extension method module to a dll and adding it to other projects as a reference. I tried to do it with creating a class project and pasting the code of the extension method module and compile the dll and then added it as reference to another project and imported the class with the keyword imports, but it didn't work.