The way I'm doing this is performing multiple reads on different tables to extract data. In this case I'm reading 2 different MS Access 2003 tables. I then dump the data into a "Row" variable that I have Publicly defined for each Class (each Access table is defined as a Class containing all the fields, Add, Change, Delete, and Select functions).For example, my first read extracts all the fields from the "tblClients" table and loads them into the form fields via the "clientROW" object. My second read extracts all the records from the "tblClientAddr" table associated with the selected Client and loads them into their form fields respectfully via the "addressROW" object.
I get an error when updating a related table, the main table can be updated but the related gives me a concurrency error but I don't know why. Btw I'm the only one using the program and it's connecting to sql server 2005 express.Inserting works like a charm.My piece of code, I hope you get it. The concurrency error is given on Me._objtblOrderinformatieA.Update(Me.objdtsOrders.orderInformatie)
If MessageBox.Show("Bent u zeker dat u deze record wilt wijzigen?", "Orderbeheer", MessageBoxButtons.YesNo) = 6 Then update_dataset() Me._objtblOrdersA.Update(Me.objdtsOrders.orders)
I'm new to vb.net and its database methods so I'm a bit confused by these datasets and grids and table adapters.
I'm getting:Concurrency violation: the UpdateCommand affected 0 of the expected 1 records.
On this line:frmMain.AccountsTableAdapter.Update(frmMain.DsAccounts)
I have a datagridview attached to a dataset. I also have a button that the user can press to update information in the datagrid based on a website. But I often get that error when it comes to actually updating the table.
I am getting a concurrency error on a truegrid. Basically I put some data in a row and and then do a dataadapter update command on the bound dataset. This works fine until I then modify the same row and do an update. How can I make it so that I don't get an error?
A concurrency violation error? It happens on this statement:
CODE:
It thinks I'm using a key value of 1 when the actual value is really 1218. I'm using a command builder. The attachments show the value of the key value and the value of the update text values. By the way, I can insert data but not update it.
I am making a simple program that allows a user to add and delete contacts from a database. Whenever I try to delete a contact that was created in a previous session (by session, I mean time that I ran and then ended the program), it is fine, but when I try to delete a contact created in the same session, it says: "Concurrency violation: the DeleteCommand affected 0 of the expected 1 records." here is the code for the delete button: [code] I noticed that, since the error does not happen on a new session, that if I added the code that happens at the form_load, I could fix the issue.
with this code? Im getting a conurrency error when I try to update the access database:Concurrency error the delete command deleted zero of the expected records
I am using the select command to find a specific row and if its found update it but when I update back to live database I get a concurrency error. Here is my
I am working on a program whereby insert, update and delete of database is required, i have been able to do so successfully but the above error occurs when i tried to insert a new row of data into the database and tried to edit it and update it to the database. The database platform i used is SQL server 2005 and i am using datagridview to display my data, my primary key is "s/n" which is an auto number, however, whenever after i insert data into the database, the newly added row has the "s/n" column blank shown in the datagridview and after i edited that row and tried to update it, the error occurs.
I've got a problem with my latest project, I get concurrency error but I'm the only one working on the database.It's an sql server 2005 express database, and i'm making a remote connection. I have a related database or how do I say it, it's with relations. But the strange thing is that I can update the first table but the 2nd one not. Well here is my code, don't really know how to explain it better but I get an error when updating my orderinformation table but when only changing values in orders that table updates perfectly. [code]
My users are getting this error when trying to update the database:
"Concurrency violation: UpdateCommand affected 0 of the expected 1 records"
All the users are doing is clicking a button which updates a record.No two users are updating the same record or even within the same column. They could be updating within the same row but still not the same record.It seems to be happening when the program is open for a little while and they come back and try to update the database through the program. I have read a little bit about this error but none seem to lead to a clear solution.It seems like the database connection is timing out due to inactivity?Here is my update command:
vb.net
Private Sub btnComplete_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles btnComplete.Click Me.txtComplete.Text = Date.Today[code].....
I'm having an issue with a concurrency violation when I save my data(only on one form). All other data forms are working fine. This form has a lot of code, so to isolate the problem I added a new form to the project and dragged the table from my datasource, in detail, to the form. this is the only code in the form,
In our database we have gigantic tables (it was initially built 20 years ago). We are on the process of developing it.
Some tables contain rowversion and optimistic concurrency. We were wondering if there is a way to just correspond rowversion to the modification of some specific columns, but not all of them. In Normal Case, T-SQL which is generated then would be huge.
We got an old system here in .NET 4.0 using an Oracle DB. At some point, some calculus are made and the system "locks" that register in the table using the following command: "SELECT [the registry that will be update by the calculus] FOR UPDATE NOWAIT". So if anyone tries to calculate or update the registry with that ID it won't work. After calculating, the system connects to the DB again and then "releases" the registry by simply executing a Rollback command.
Theoretically, this is correct for the system(although I don't like it). Anyway, here is the thing: if something is being calculated(and these calculous take like 5 minutes to finish) and in the middle of the calculous I close the browser, the registry will still be "locked", only being unlocked when IIS restarts(actually I dunno if it's released first, I forced IIS restart 'cause it was taking too long). [Code]
I am doing a small project and I am using vb.net with MS access database. I am facing a Concurrency issue sometimes when I try to save data in the datagried view. I have added the datagried view by dragding and drop the table from the data source. Only one user is using the form to save data at one time. I think it works properly unless I moved from record to record then it gives me an error. "Concurrency, 0 records updated from expected 1....."
i understand that web service creates its own sessions so thats no problem to multi-thread. but i am writing my results into the database and files. how to do i do my concurrency control for writing into file and database here, can i do it on my calling app which is a console app or i will have to do it in my web service. i am not returning anything to the calling app.
I am trying to make a simple demo of a DataGridView bound to a database table. I want to add a row, delete a row, and save the table. I used the IDE to do just about everything. It created the BindingSource when I set the datasource of the DataGridView to a table of a DataSource I added to the project.
Now the only code looks like this: Public Class Form1 Private Sub DataGridView1_CellContentClick(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.Windows.Forms.DataGridViewCellEventArgs) Handles DataGridView1.CellContentClick End Sub Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load [Code] .....
I set the AutoIncrementStep to 1 in my Key field in the dataset (the .xsd). I left the Key field visible in the DataGridView and it seems to be adding the correct Key when a row is added. However, I still occasionally get the "concurrency violation" error if I just mess around with these 3 buttons. Any idea why/how to prevent that?
get around the following problem please?I have an Access database which can be accessed by more than one instance of my application (which is) a Form with a DataGridView on it.I populate the DGV with
Form1.Validate()Form1.CHECKLISTBindingSource.EndEdit()Form1.CHECKLISTTableAdapter.Update(Form1.chkDataSet.CHECKLIST) The Access Database can then be updated via the DGV by a button click (which runs the code above (to copy across the latest copy of the DB) and then runs the code below to copy your changes to the DB)
I'm trying to update a Access database. I'm new to this and I've reviewed an Ado tutorial early today. I'm trying to apply what is taught but I'm getting an error message and I can't seem to get passed it.
In my code I have an Add, Update, and Delete process. The Add and Delete processes work just fine. It is only when I go to update the database that I get the following message."Concurrency violation: the UpdateCommand affected 0 of the expected 1 records."
Okay have developed a form in vb.net cf using sqlce. I know this is the vb.net section but I feel it's a data issue. I have a table called STORES which has a primary key of two columns (ST_STORECODE & ST_CY_CODE).I populate a dataset with all the store data and to the following to find the required row:-
[Code]...
When I step over the update command I get a concurrency error. Can someone PLEASE help me with this. I have spend days trying to fix it. All I want to do is find a row, do some changes and save it back to the database.
When my project starts, it first checks for the existence of certain rows in the database. During testing, I often delete these rows, as they get kind of messed up over time due to all the odd tests I am running. For that reason, if when the project starts, if the records are not there, the program first creates them.The records are pretty static over the lifetime of the project, so they are held in a dataset for ready access from various parts of the program. Therefore, if the records are not in the database, the records are added to the dataset, and the dataset is updated back to the database. This works without any issues.However, one of the easiest actions to take will cause one of these records to change two fields, and a new record will be added. Those are all the changes that are caused by this action. Those changes are then updated to the database...or so I hoped, but when I try that I get an exception stating:[code]I have looked at the datatable that is being updated, and there are, as I expect, two records being changed. One of the records is the new one that is being added, while the second record is the record that was changed. I have noted that the change is, in fact, different from what is in the database, so this really IS an update.
However, I also noted that if I then stop the program and start it again, all is well. This indicated to me that it was actually the routine that created the records that was causing the trouble. Therefore, to test this out, I tried a totally horrible solution. I altered the method that writes to the new records to the database so that after it wrote each record, it would clear the whole dataset and fill it all again. That's obviously a terrible thing to do, but it works. If I write each record, throw out the dataset and re-create it, then I don't get any exceptions when I later try to modify it.This makes no sense to me. What am I doing in that first method that could be putting the Dataset into a state where it fails on any further modifications? I should add that the code that actually pushes the changes to the dataset down to the DB is the same for both methods. In fact, the database is updated in an UpdateDB method that is called from that first method (which creates the initial records if they are missing), as well as being called by the other methods that alter the dataset. I have also confirmed that ANY alterations I want, whether they add, remove, or just alter records, works fine. It is only that one method that creates the initial records that is causing me trouble. Moreover, it is not the actual update of the DB that is doing it, since that same method works fine ever after. Further testing has showed that the issue is row by row. As each initial row is added, it can't be modified by any other code until the dataset has been re-read from the DB. url...
I'm developing an Ajax-based application which makes heavy use of server calls to a WCF layer that communicates with a DB.Whenever I effect from the client (an ASP.NET page) many calls within a short span of time to the underlying WCF services, the system hangs and goes into a idle state.
I am using a TableAdapter to connect to my database table.When I perform an Update and someone else has updated the same row I get a concurrency violation error. As expected.So at this point I give the user the option to Save regardless or Cancel changesIf they cancel I can just performs a Fill to get an updated copy of the data but what if they want to overwrite? How do I actually force a save of the data overwriting the data held in the database?
I'm having some trouble updating changes I made to a datatable via a dataadapter. I am getting "Concurrency violation: the UpdateCommand affected 0 of 10 rows"
'Get data Dim Docs_DistributedTable As New DataTable("Docs_Distributed") Dim sql = "SELECT DISTINCT CompanyID, SortKey, OutputFileID, SequenceNo, DeliveredDate,
This code used to work but for some reason it doesn't anymore. I get the error "Concurrency violation: the DeleteCommand affected 0 of the expected 1 records." I checked to see if the values were in the db and they were, by the way I'm using Access 03. I commented out the try/catch block and got the error when trying to update the ds.
im using a sqldataadapter, dataset and bindingsource to connect to a table. i retrieve all records from the database and i change the data on a field then update changes to database. when i try to change back to original value i get a Concurrency violation error (concurrency violation: The updatecommand affected 0 of the expected 1). this is the
Try Me.Validate() Me.sqlBindingSource.EndEdit() Dim slqCmdBuilder As New SqlCommandBuilder(sqlAdapter)
Target machine 4 core AMD I have an event that is raised my the main thread of the application. The event is consumed by several different classes in the application. I want them all to run concurrently up to the max cores available and then que the rest in order.The work routine in each class is relatively small but concurrency is the goal.Considering this.
A. Create a background worker on each classes initialization and have the event handler start the worker.
B. Create a delegate to the do-work sub that is called by the event handler
A- Pros - worker is only created once and reusable so only pay creation cost once.
A-Cons could create a ton of workers that consume resources eventually.
give me some example code to insert rows of datagridview into a sql express database table? Also, how do I manage concurrency as it is a multi user application?
