I prefer object attributes to only be allowed to be initialised within methods, and that all attributes should be required to be initialised in the Constructor, even if they are initialised to Nothing, i.e. they still must be explicitly assigned a value during object construction.[code]...
View 2 RepliesI come from ROBLOX. Anyway, whats wrong with with code, it's in a button.
ProgressBar1.Value = "100"
if ProgressBar1.Value = "100" then
Me.Close()
I do realize it's missing all of the Private Sub, and end class stuff... This is just the main body of code.
if for example i have two private sub I declared a local variable on private sub a... is there a way that private sub b could use the variable created on private sub a? Im asking because im in a problem in my app were using global variable is not an option to make the long story short
View 5 RepliesI've been contracted to analyze an existing Data Provider and I know the following code is faulty; but in order to point out how bad it is, I need to prove that it's susceptible to SQL injection.
Question What "Key" parameter could break the PrepareString function and allow me to execute a DROP statement?
[Code]...
I have a button that when you click executes a certain code, lets say I make a menu that when clicked on should execute the same code, so how can I do this without having to copy/paste the same code twice.
View 10 RepliesI have been told before that it is possible to create sections of code which can be collapsed and expanded like a normal Public or Private Sub, but containing multiple Public Subs So say I have code for a variety of textboxes I wanted to be able to collapse, how would I do this?
View 3 Repliesa simple question. Given the following code:
Public Class MyClass
Private WithEvents pPerClass As PersistableClass
Public Overridable Property PerClass() As PersistableClass
Get
Return pPerClass
[Code]...
the first being a duplication of the second key, strangely obtained from a private field.
If you remove the WithEvents keyword, the pPerClass_PersistableClassID key is not created.
I am new to EF but it seems to me a strange behaviour.
I would like this ASP button control to stop calling its event handler when the JavaScript client method IsCorrectPrice() returns false.
<asp:Button ID="btnsubmit" runat="server"
Text="Submit" OnClientClick="javascript:IsCorrectPrice()"/>
btnsubmit_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs)
Handles btnsubmit.Click
I have the following in my aspx.
[Code]...
How can I get the < > " characters to render properly?
i'm working on a voting system but im having problems in adding records... i have two a primary key, the idnumber and the address. the address is where I base if that certain address already voted. but the problem is everytime i try to add a record with the same address (ex. Block 1 lot 4), the data is duplicated which is not output i want. the program should detect that there is already an existing address.
[Code]...
what is code that prevent user to given number less than 8 in the text box. If the user give less then 8 number then message box box will appear which show Minimum Number is 8. Here is my code
Private Sub btnregister_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles btnregister.Click
If TELEPHONETextBox.Text.Trim.Length = 0 Then
MsgBox("Please Enter Phone Number", MsgBoxStyle.Question)
Me.TELEPHONETextBox.Focus()
[code].....
Is it possible for a class of exposing a type for function returns, without allowing users of that class to create variables of that type? A couple usage scenarios:A Fluent interface on a large class; a statement like "foo=bar.WithX(5).WithY(9).WithZ(19);" would be inefficient if it had to create three new instances of the class, but could be much more efficient if the WithX could create one instance, and the other statements could simply use it.A class may wish to support a statement like "foo[19].x = 9;" even when foo itself isn't an array, and does not hold the data in class instances that can be exposed to the public; one way to do that is to have foo[19] return a struct which holds a reference to 'foo' and the value '19', and has a member property 'x' which could call "foo.SetXValue(19, 9);" Such a struct could have a conversion operator to convert itself to the "apparent" type of foo[19].In both of these scenarios, storing the value returned by a method or property into a variable and then using it more than once would cause strange behavior. It would be desirable if the designer of the class exposing such methods or properties could ensure that callers wouldn't be able to use them more than once. Is there any practical way to accomplish that?In formulating a question, it's difficult sometimes to draw the line between complicated usage cases, and simpler usage cases which aren't quite so important. Here's another usage case, and one closer to the one I'd be most interested in (though I'm also interested in Fluent chaining; being able to have something behave like a C++ reference to a value type would be nice, but probably too much work to bother with).I have a type which is somewhat like the Windows registry, in that it is a hierarchical collection of items, each of which may have a string value, an integer value, and/or a nested collection of items. I wish to be able to support the following types of usage:[code]As for the Fluent interface, my thought would be to have the WithXXX properties return a new instance of a derived class which shadows (not overrides!) the WithXXX properties with versions that simply modify the current instance. The return object from WithXXX would be known to be of the derived class, and would thus use the shadowed WithXXX methods, but once it was assigned to a variable, it would be regarded as an instance of the base class, so the next WithXXX would create a new instance.
C++ a stronger concept of value types than C# or vb.net, including the very useful concept of references to value types; it ensures that references to value types cannot be persisted outside the scope of the type in question. Unsafe code in C# can use pointers to value types, but they don't have the protections offered by C++ references.
I am using Oracle 11g client, with ODP.NET. I am trying to add conditional Transaction handling.
Dim ds As New DataSet()
Dim txn As OracleTransaction
Dim _beginTransaction as Bolean = true
Using conn As New OracleConnection(ConnString)
[Code]...
How do I fix txn being nothing / null? The error is: Variable 'txn' is used before it has been assigned a value. A null reference exception could result at runtime. Edit: to RichardOD for pointing out that you can not explicitly declare that a transaction cannot be opend up on stored procedures via ODP.NET. I have verified that this is an issue. BUT We still haven't figured out why the error is occuring. I understand that txn is initially given a value w/in an if statement, but being defined outside of the try/catch block should make that irrelevant.... right? Or is that bad coding?
I need to disable a button after its pressed so the user does not have the ability to click it again as this would replicate the process in some cases.After alot of searching I found some tips - alot of code I found I could not understand.This is what I have come up with:
On page load:
If Me.Page.IsPostBack Then
'lblDetails.Text = "disabled"
[code]....
I also read somewhere that I should use: System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000) to delay the process or something - not entirely sure why I would do this though.Although, the problem with my above code is that when the code behind page performs validation checks, it exits sub before executing my INSERT SQL code - so when it does this it also disables the button.I am not entirely sure if the above method is fool proof or whether it is a **** piece of code that won't work 100% of the time.On another website I found a script to put on the actual HTML page with <script> tags:
Code:
<script type="text/javascript">
disableSubmit(frm) {
[code].....
i want to create an exe in vb.net by packaging few perl files along with it. when i am packaging those files i am able to hide those files by making the hide option true. but if the 'show hidden files' is selected those files will be visible. I want to lock/prevent the user from opening the perl file/code. want to know if there is any way to do it.
View 1 RepliesI am completely lost on procedures. Whats the difference bewteen Private sub and private function?
View 1 RepliesI need to disable a button after its pressed so the user does not have the ability to click it again as this would replicate the process in some cases. After alot of searching I found some tips - alot of code I found I could not understand.This is what I have come up with:
[code]...
I also read somewhere that I should use: System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000) to delay the process or something - not entirely sure why I would do this though.Although, the problem with my above code is that when the code behind page performs validation checks, it exits sub before executing my INSERT SQL code - so when it does this it also disables the button.I am not entirely sure if the above method is fool proof or whether it is a **** piece of code that won't work 100% of the time.On another website I found a script to put on the actual HTML page with <script> tags:
[code]...
But although this works, it does not execute my VB code in the code behind page so I am a little confused where to go here.
I have a Windows 2003 server that we regularly RDP in to monitor some programs that we set up to run on the machine automatically.However, the server will automatically log me out after a few minutes of inactivity. Unfortunately the server admin (who has the admin rights to the server, which I don't) is reluctant to remove such restrictions "for security reasons".
Therefore, instead of me trying to fill up 10000 piece of paper getting a security exemption, I am just wondering if there is any tiny program that I can run on the server (either a script or some VB.NET code) that will trick the server into thinking I am constantly typing something even though I am not (For example, as if I am moving my mouse cursor once every 30 seconds or type any letter then erase it in notepad)?Note that since I do not have admin rights, any installation is certainly out of question, and the script, if any, can not require admin rights to run properly.
I'm trying to call a private sub in another private sub. For example ;
[Code]....
explain me the difference between them? I'm new to visual basic, and I need to know the very basic things in Visual Basic allowing me to become a professional User
View 8 RepliesI am pretty new to VB.Net and OOP in general and am picking stuff up every day, but it is so easy to become burnt out with the sheer amount of info. Therefore I am taking it slowly. Yesterday I was reading my book and read that using Dim for class level variables is allowed(if the compiler is set so) but is bad design and I should instead use Private. Dim defaults to private anyway. So my question is where should I use Dim instead of Private?
View 14 RepliesI am using following code to run a private function.I have two values in my combo box, One and Two and two private functions with the same names, Private Sub One() and Private Sub Two()I want my application to call the function whatever value user choses in the combo box.If One is chosen in the combo box, Private function one should be called.Code is below, that does not work
Public Class Form1
Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
Dim vrValue = ComboBox1.Items(1)
[code]....
I have a Form that includes ContextMenuStrip1 and PictureBox called "PicBoxBack".How can I call Private Sub PicBoxBack_MouseClick from the ToolStripMenuItem_Click Procedure??[code]
View 6 RepliesI have a "Main" module that is sort of the "brain" or "top level" of my project. Basically, I think there are routines that it only should be allowed to call. Some of these routines are in other modules, so I don't know how to make them hidden to everything except the Main module. If the routine is ublic, anything can call it; if it is private then the Main module can't see it. Also the other modules are big enough that I don't feel it would be a good idea to stuff them completely inside my main module. How can I achieve this "private except in one place" functionality?
View 2 RepliesI can not for the life of me figure out how I can pass a value from one private sub to another. Been at this for a couple of hours now.
Code:
Private Sub first_one()
Dim test As String
test = "it works"
[Code].....
I'm looking to use RSA Asymmetric encryption to encrypt some data. I've read this article on the forums with a similar title, but it did not answer my question. What I would like to do is use the private key of an RSA key combination to encrypt (sign?) the data and use the public key to decrypt (verify?), as per this wikipedia article . I would like to use this method because I want people to be able to read the data, but not create it themselves. I've copied the code from Peter Bromberg's article RSA Encryption in .NET Demystified , but always get an exception with the "Bad Key" message. If I use the public key for decryption, it works fine (the opposite of what I want). use the public key for encryption.
View 2 Replieshow to make projects which span multiple files and classes just fine. I've had big multi-file things working.I've been told explicity that my classes have to be private...yet at the same time I'm supposed to have a main method elsewhere and somehow call a menu in my main working file.I can get the program working perfectly when I do it in a logical manner but I just can't figure out how to call a private sub. I keep getting the error reference to a non-shared member requires an object reference.I've tried breaking the rules a bit and making one initial sub which is public, shared, etc... but all this does is delays the error until it tries to call its first private sub.
View 3 RepliesRight now I'm using:
Dim newProxy As New IEProxy
If newProxy.SetProxy(proxyip) Then
....
[code].....
I don't suppose there is a VB equivalent to a property's {get; private set;} in C#? I get errors if I try to make the Set private (I also need the property to be overridable). Readonly is the closest thing i can think of, but this does not work with my situation (working with NHibernate).
View 15 RepliesSo I created this thread: Invoking Private / Protected Methods Via Reflection From The Same Object Instance (or Base) And we got the problem fixed save for private methods. As this may not be the same issue I thought it may be best to post a different question with the full source. It is still a work in progress but it is functional.
[Code]...
So this class is being inherited by a (so far) empty child class and ProcessStage is being called. Notice that ConfirmFormDataIsValid() sub is private. If you run this it will not find this method. If I change it to protected however it works fine.