I'm making a class and I have a function in this class the is looking to see if a user account in enabled.
Public Function IsEnable(byval user as string) as boolean
'if user is enables
return true
else
return fulse
end function
What is it just does not find the user, how would I return an error that the person using the DLL could detect and catch?
This is probably a really basic (no pun intended) question, but I can't seem to find an answer anywhere.Why does the result of func1 return False and func2 returns True? On every other test I have done, integer 1 is converted to boolean true and 0 to false. Works ok if I just set rtnValue to 1 or 0.
My brain may just be fried since it's the end of the semester, but my teacher kicked this back to fix and resubmit...she said that I am "returning the name of your function rather than your variable name".
Here is my code for all 3 forms.
code:
These are forms to calculate the cost of getting a cell phone package.
This is just an efficiency question really.. I'm interested to know if there is a more efficient or logical way that people use to handle this sort of scenario.
In my asp.net application I am running a script to generate a new project my code at the top level looks like this:
Dim ok As Boolean = True ok = createFolderStructure() If ok Then ok = createMDB()
[Code]....
I create a boolean and each function returns a boolean result, the next function in this chain will only run if the previous one was successful. I do this because an asp.net application will continue to run through the page life cycle unless there is an unhandled exception and I don't want my whole application to be screwed up if something in the chain goes wrong (there is a lot of copying and deleting of files etc.. in this example).
Private Function CheckForNull(fieldvalue as string) as Boolean
That checks that all my fields are not empty? For example, say I have three fields txtFirstName, txtLastName, and txtAddress. How would I write the function above that would check that these fields were not left empty?
I have a math program that I am working on. One of the exercises has a random word and 6 radiobuttons. The user has to select the radiobutton that displays the exact number of letters in the random word. What I am having trouble with is creating a Public Function to check if the answer selected is the correct one. The radio buttons are within a groupbox. The Public Function returns a boolean True or False.
Simple code! where am I going wrong. I get end of statement expected in line 4 after valid.
Public Class Form1 Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click If valid('0') Is True Then msgbox("HI") End If
returning a function value? I have a simple function that returns an integer. This function works fine when executed in SQL Developer but, when called from my apps, it always returns 2 regardless of anything. I have checked it over and over again, I cant seems to find where I am going wrong.
what changes I need to make to the code so that when no value for intPosition is found the textbox txtRoomNumber remains blank? At the moment a value is being entered into the textbox when no value for intPosition is found.
Code: Private Sub btnFindRoom_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles btnFindRoom.Click Dim strRoomType As String Dim intRoomNumber As Integer
I have a HTTP class that gets content from URL's, POST's content to URL's etc and then returns the raw HTML content.In the function inside of the class it detects if there is a HTTP error and if so I would like to return false but will this work if I have declared the function to return a String?
Code Sample of what I am trying to do (Note the Return Content & Return False if a HTTP error code is detected)Public Function Get_URL(ByVal URL As String) As String
Public Function Checked() As Boolean Return applyChange 'this is a string! End Function
Whats going on here? How can a function with return type Boolean actually return a string? I'm assuming theres some implicit conversion going on here, which I'd rather not have.
I am hopeing someone can help me here with a recursive function I have that is not returning either true or false as I would have espected it to. The function loops through a Active Directory group for its members and then calls itself if it encounters any groups within the membership in order to gets its members as well. I am trying to return either true or false based on if any errors were encountered but not haveing any luck at all. It appears to just hang and never return back to the primary calling sub that starts the recursive function. Below is my code I am using:
If an object is created inside a function and the function returns that type of oject how is the memory handled.
Example:
Public Function GetEmployee(employeeid as integer) as employee Dim oEmployee as new employee oEmployee.FirstName="Bob"
[code]....
Does the variable that receive the object still a pointer to the memory location that was used inside the function?What about when you do a oEmployee2=oEmployee.Is oEmployee2 just a pointer? And any changes to oEmployee will now affect the other. Just trying to understand it from a memory perspective and how that scope works?
I have stored procedure which I will execute its result and pass it into a Dataset and return it but at the same time I have a Output parameter in my stored procedure which I also want to return, how can I return both the dataset and the integer output value with my function, or is there a more 'appropriate way' to handle such situation?[code]
I need to return an array but the array size will change from one call of the function to another so I need away to storing the returned array. The function is as below, and as you can see the returned array will be of different sizes:
Im overiding getRolesForUser() I have 2 columns i return from the query IAdapter.GetRolesByUserName(userName) returns two columns (roleID, formID) How can I return them and access the two columns data? 2 dimensional array?
Is it possible to return more than one value from a function? Like two integers, or an integer and a boolean, or any other data type combination. I understand I could use a sub and set these values in a variable but I was wondering if I could avoid declaring more variables by using a function.
I'm attempting to create a function that will get the User Accounts from the registry. I then need to loop through those users and commit specific actions on each one.Here's my function:
VB .NET ublic Function UserAccounts() As String Dim userskey As RegistryKey = Registry.LocalMachine.OpenSubKey("SOFTWAREMicrosoftWindows
I've got this MustInherit class called ViewerElement, from which derive classes like ViewerLine, ViewerImage, etc.Then, in the main program I have a collection of different elements (Images, Lines, etc.). What I want to do is something like the following:
[Code]...
I'm getting desperate to implement this Clone method without getting errors. How should this be de done?
Ok simply my code doesnt want to output the correct number. I'm working on the project euler probems to expand my knowledge in VB.net and the current question I am working on is asking to work with triangle numbers. while researching I found that a triangle number can be calculated by using the formula:
i being ordered to change my function skill to returning value by using struct but not using pointer. may i know what is the pro and con between this 2?
I'm having trouble finding out how define this function so I can return the arrayRight now I am defining the returnobject as 'object' but I would like to do it properly.The Function goes something like this:
I have a WCF Service Function that Returns a typed dataset. How can I return an error or message to the client?Public Function ReturnMyDS(Byval Identity as Integer) as dsMyDataSet Implements Iservice.ReturnMyDS
Try Return = RetrievemyDataset Catch ex as exception
I am working on a project I would like to use a function in a class I created to return multiple values in order to populate a listbox. I wanted to use a do until loop to achieve this. I will just post a simplified example of what I am doing :
Public Function Listboxfiller Dim astring As String = "This is a string" Dim Counter as integer = 0 Do until Counter = 5 return astring Counter += 1 Loop
Then on the form I would do something like : lstListbox.Items.Add(Myclass.Listboxfiller)
What happens right now is that the listbox only gets the first value, when I ran through in debug mode I found the loop only runs once, even though it should go multiple times.
I'm trying to return changes to array data, including redimensioned arrays, from within a function call in code similar to: fault = MyFunction(Array1, Array2) Public Function MyFunction(ByVal inObj1 as UserStruture(), ByVal inObj2 and Integer(,)) as String Dim myResult as String = "Failed" Dim tmpStruct() as UserStructure = inObj1
[Code] .....
This works fine in updating the input array 'Array1', only when the redimensioning of tmpStruct is NOT performed. After redimensioning tmpStruct, the redimensioned array is passed back successfully into 'inObj1' within the function 'MyFunction', but is not passed out of the function call; i.e. fault = MyFunction(Array1, Array2) -
The dimension of array 'Array1' out of the function call remains as it was before the function call. However, the data change; i.e. tmpStruct(0).Nam = "New Name" is passed successfully out of the function call.
Why the Redim operation is not passed back out of such function calls. I would like to return changes to arrays 'Array1' and 'Array2', plus a result string from the function call if I can. Furthermore, I would also like to change the dimension of the array within the function call, if required, and return the complete redimensioned array back out of the function call.