Why Don't Dynamic XML Literals Inherit Default Namespace
Feb 5, 2010
I have an XElement that I need to create via dynamic xml literals/embedded expressions and I need it to inherit the default namespace. This doesn't appear possible though through everything I've tried. how to make this work?
For example
Imports <xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation">
Sub CreateXAML()
Dim obj = "Rectangle"
I'm experimenting with xml literals in vb.net and there's something I don't get. Here's a small sample that illustrates the problem. I'm adding two PropertyGroup nodes to an empty Visual Studio project. The first one is added as xml literal, the second as new XElement:
Imports <xmlns="[URL]"> Module MyModule Sub Main() Dim vbproj = <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> <Project ToolsVersion="4.0" DefaultTargets="Build" xmlns="[URL]"> [Code] .....
This code writes the following output: <Project ToolsVersion="4.0" DefaultTargets="Build" xmlns="[URL]"> <PropertyGroup xmlns="[URL]"></PropertyGroup> <PropertyGroup /> </Project> As you can see, the first PropertyGroup node contains a redundant xmlns declaration. Why is that, and can it be avoided?
In a nutshell, I am selecting values from a checked box column in a grid view. After checking the boxes I have a function that concatenates each customer number into a string called @CusList to use a parameter for a stored procedure Public Function SelectCusList()
Dim CusShow As String Dim CusStr As String Dim CusList As String CusStr = ""
I am using the Microsoft Encoder 4.0 dll's for capturing any activity. I have used registered dll as been imported in my project. but if the expression is not installed then there comes error in my application code.(actually the dll is missing to be used if expression encoder is not installed)."how to check for available dll and use it in my code?"
I've wrote a class library in vb. it only has a class called MathEx. Now when i add a reference to a test project, i had to refer to the class as MathEx.MathEx is there anyway i could refer to the class as simply MathEx? (in other words i do not wish to have the default namespace added to my class libraries)
I have a VB Web Site project that has recently (and mysteriously) stopped importing the "System" namespace by default.
I'm having to either place an Imports System line at the top of each code behind, or preface everything with System, which is fairly annoying, not to mention redundant. I can't for the life of me figure out how to get the System namespace back to being imported by default.
I've already checked to see that WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727CONFIGweb.config contains the <add namespace="System"/> line--it does. That was my best lead.
I have references to several namespaces within the System namespace in the <assemblies> node (e.g. System.Design, System.Web.Extensions of my website's web.config. There is no <namespaces> node. This has not been changed recently.
Is that possible to create a class in vb.net that is not in the default namespace of the project?
for example, say you have a project call sample1, then automatially IDE will have everything default to the Sample1 as your namespace root rather than under global, which is find for most case.but I want to create some classes that is directly under global namespace
I would use the System.Linq.Dynamic. I added the specified Dynamic.vb file, that starts like this:
[Code]...
to my (VB.NET)solution. Now Visual Studio does not recognize anymore in the project files the System.XXX references, proposing me to change them to Global.System.XXX
I need to read an xml document from a database record into an XDocument object in order for it to be deserialized. So that the deserialization will work, I need to apply a specific namespace to each of the level 1 elements. So XML looks a bit like this:
[Code]...
How do I prevent the blank/empty namespace being added to each child element of the element to which the required namespace has been applied?
This class is located in the namespace Acme.Infrastructure.Interface.A class with the same name EventArgs exists in the System namespace.In another project in my solution I have a class Acme.BusinessModules.MyModule.MyClass.When attempting to use the EventArgs class I have to fully qualify the class name or the compiler thinks I am using the System.EventArgs class.My understanding of namespace resolution was that the compiler would first look for the class in the current namespace, and then its parents. It seems that the compiler checks in System before it checks in sibling namespaces. Is it correct that System is checked before the sibling? Or is this behaviour caused by other issues (Imports order?)?
I have a class called Profile that has some simple properties and then it can have a collection of ProfileItem that again has some simple properties and then it can have a collection of ProfileItem (RECURSION). Now I am trying to generated a very simple save function using XML Literals that come with VB.NET (3.5).
is there a way to enable IntelliSense for XML literals in VB9 (VS 2008)?The ideal source of IntelliSense is an XSD document, but I can use anything else format to do it.
If it's possible, it would be a lifesaver since I can't use XElement and XAttribute to add the nodes manually. We have multiple templates and they frequently change (edit on the fly).
If this is not doable, can you think of another way so that I can use templates for the XML?
I am using XML Literals and Linq to XML to read/write data to an external system.[code]The client now wants to put the url in a parameter table so the table can change to point to a test server or a real server. I assume that I cannot put a variable in my Imports statement.So how to I access the correct URL from a variable?url...
I'm using the following function to brighten up color values (it's a lambda in my code, but that shouldn't make a differende):
Function ReduceDistanceTo255(ByVal i As Byte) As Byte Return i + (255 - i) 2 End Function
It won't compile, since the compiler interprets 255 and 2 as integers rather than bytes, making the result of type Integer. Unfortunately, there is no Byte type character, so I cannot just write 255B or something like that.There are a few obvious workarounds to the problem:
Function ReduceDistanceTo255(ByVal i As Byte) As Byte Return i + (CByte(255) - i) CByte(2) End Function
and
Function ReduceDistanceTo255(ByVal i As Byte) As Byte Return CByte(i + (255 - i) 2) End Function
[code]....
The first one is just plain ugly and hard to read, because every literal needs to be CByted. The second one performs calculations in integers and then converts the result to Byte, which is OK, but not as elegant as a pure-Byte operation. The third workaround doesn't require CBytes, but it's drawbacks are obvious.
In VB.NET I can easily embed strings into XML literals using <xml><%= "my string" %></xml>. How can I embed an XElement instance? I know I can use methods on the XElement, XNode, etc classes, but I'd like to do it in the XML literals if possible.
I am constructing some XML using XML literals. I have a function which returns an XElement.
Function RootElementFormattingFunction() as XElement Return <Root Data="foo"/> End Function
In reality it is a bit more complicated than that, but it is called from several places. Now I have linq sequence which generates a set of nodes which I want to make children of the XElement returns
I'm trying to use the builtin XML literals feature to create/read xml files using my own schemas, but I don't see a way to cast an abstract XElement from a base type to a more derived type.The schema/xml below shows in general what I'm working with, but using XML literals only allows me to use the base type in the IDE, so the xml below is treated as a collection of elements of the base type, instead one of the base type and one of the derived type.
Is there any other way of removing a specific tag other than looping through every tag and checking a certain value? I would assume this could become of timely process if there are many tags.
As basic as this is, it took me a few minutes to figure out, so wanted to share with the rest of the community to avoid anyone else from wasting their time.
I am attempting to generate the following XML string using VB.NET XML Literals
<Books> <Book Name="The First Book" /> <Book Name="The Second Book" /> </Books>
[Code]....
But the compiler is complaining about the quotes that are supposed to surround the attribute value. I tried using single quotes, two double quotes, nothing works.
My problem is that I want to include control structures in the embedded XML. Specifically, I want to include or exclude an entire element (not just its contents) based on a boolean expression. The question extends to other control structures as well though.
I'd expect the <% %> syntax to support inling of code but that doesn't seem to function in VB.net's implementation (as opposed to the <%= %> for inlining the result of an evaluated expression, which does).
Here's some very simple code by way of example only.
Public Class Foo Private bar As String = Nothing Private baz As String = Nothing
[code]....
I'd much prefer to use the format of getXMLBad() if possible. In this short example it doesn't seem critical, but in much larger examples, the inlining of the logic is more readable and maintainable than the "assembly" style in getXML(). This especially true when the logic is in the middle of large block of static XML and when coding to a very strict or complex schemas.I'd be interested in the capability to extend this to Looping constructs as well.
Currently am working on a project that requires me to create some XML for use with a graphing plugin. I'm using XML literals and LINQ to SQL as follows
Dim x As XElement = _ <chart caption='Aantal aanvragen' xAxisName='Dag' yAxisName='Aantal'> <%= From d In dailies Select _
I have a masked textbox on my form for a phone number. I want to store its value in my Database without the literals as the database field for that phone is only 10 characters long. How do I store this value in the database field without any literals.
been working on a large scale project and Iow looking into the document print engine for the application. been a while since Ie built an app that retrieves data from the database and outputs to Word. I generally always used the mail merge feature of Word but after reading the link above this seems far easier.