Start Multiple Threads But Not A Specific Number?
Dec 3, 2009I want to start multiple threads but not a specific number. For example;
private sub do_sth
...
end sub
[Code]....
ADVERTISEMENT
Create A Loop That Will Declare And Start Multiple Threads?
May 30, 2011Basically with the code below I would like to create multiple threads. Let's say user input was the number 100 for the "userVal" variable of type integer. With the first pass of the loop, starting with 1, I would like to[code]...
View 10 RepliesMultithreading - .NET 4.0 Execute Multiple Threads But Threads Are Completed Before Resuming?
Oct 19, 2011I just had a new, last-minute idea on to take on a task, so I am running to StackExchange for quick help.
What I want to do is execute a series of methods right in a row, each in their own threads. I want the application to wait until all of these threads are completed, after which the program will resume. It also has to use managed threading (thread pool).
What quick examples could you provide to help me along the way? If it's too complex, what things should I know about so that I can Google it on my own?
VS 2010 Unable To Start Specific Command With Process.start
Jun 18, 2011Here's what I currently have:
[Code]...
I've commented out various things to limit it to specifically this command (example, I can swap mklink out with notepad and it works fine). The command runs fine from a DOS window, but can't be found when I use it this way. I also tried using the SHELL command just to test and I get the same results. No idea why it can't be found, as like I said it executes from the command prompt just fine.
Pass Multiple Parameters To Multiple Threads?
Sep 15, 2011I have a loop that creates several threads as such[code]...
View 1 Replies.net - Doesn't Media.SoundPlayer.Play() Actually Start A Two New Threads, When Called Twice?
Mar 9, 2011I'm writing a simple little program in VB.NET that has to play two sounds - at the same time.The problem is, that when I call SoundPlayer.Play() twice in immediate succesion, it seems that the latter call sorts of "takes over" the thread that is created by the first call, instead of creating a new one, like it says it should do in the docs.I'm using the following code:
Private Sub Button_OFD_Sound1_Browse_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button_OFD_Sound1_Browse.Click
LoadSound(OFD_Sound1, TextBox_OFD_Sound1_SelectedFile, SoundPlayer_Sound1)
End Sub
[Code]...
VS 2008 Manage / Start Two Threads Which Read Some Elements In An Array
Jun 5, 2010I have a function which does some processing. Lets name that function DoWork. This function takes some inputs as structure and a string. Now I want to start two threads which would read some elements in an array and then call DoWork with some data and value of that element. DoWork would do processing and thats it. I want two threads to run side by sid.
So I tried to write code but kinda failed. I wrote a function which starts a thread and calls DoWork. Now DoWork accepts structure and string etc. But when we do say abcthread = new threadig.thread(addressof <sub name>). here we cant pass any-value except object. That was first problem.
Anyway, main problem is after the thread has finished processing DoWork, how do I find that out and tell that thread to take another element from array and start again. This has to be managed for both the threads. I need to find out which thread has finished first and tell it to start again with another value. I have usually used one thread but not two in this way.
Run X Number Of Manageable Threads?
Mar 23, 2011How can I make an application to start only "x" number of threads at a time?
View 1 RepliesVS 2010 Get A Max Of Number Of Threads Available?
Feb 26, 2012I've written an app - that use httplisteners to talk to other winforms (they will be services but are now simple form apps so I can easily show stats as they communicate). One UI app talking to three other "service" apps - all talking to each other as well...Everything uses multi-threading...At any rate - how many threads do I have available - I see that most of the apps seem to run "two or three" consecutive threads - but not more than that.Is that just a byproduct of running in the IDE - or is there a max of number of threads available?When more threads are asked for than are available - do they simply wait to get started for a free thread to become available?
View 4 RepliesCount Occurance Of A Specific Number & Specific String In Text File Using Vb8?
Dec 13, 2010i am a beginner in vb8 i have a text file named alarm.txt,sample alarm.txt file is shown below
can someone help me to read the alarm.txt file and extract data.for eg
[Code]...
C# - Can The Number Of Foreground Threads Be Determined In .NET
Mar 8, 2011I've searched a good deal on the topic and have found little results. It seems adding foreground into the criteria on any engine I've used causes tons of entry level documents on threading in .Net.
In my current project I have a foreground thread within a static class that lies dormant until it is told otherwise. It contains a queue of items that must be processed and the items application cannot close without all items being processed. Right now I have a method that tells the thread that it should stop accepting new items and close when it is finished processing everything, but not everyone on the team remembers to call the method. Having the GUI close while the process still runs in the background is quite a bug in my opinion. If I can add a periodic check to see if the queued thread is the last foreground thread, then I can call the method and not have to worry about others that use the class.
How To Create A Dynamic Number Of Threads
Jan 6, 2010Currently I create a thread the following way (the normal way)
Public loginThread As Thread
Public loginThreadStart As New ThreadStart(AddressOf LogIntoWhatever)
Public callLoggedIn As New MethodInvoker(AddressOf loggedIn)
However, what I want to be able to do is something along the lines of (this obviously does not work, and is entirely pseudocode)
dim i as integer = 0
for i = 0 to i = 25
Public loginThread(i) as Thread
Public loginThreadStart(i) as New ThreadStart(AddressOf LogIntoWhatever)
next i
Public callLoggedIn as new MethodInvoker(AddressOf loggedIn)
Where I could change 25 to whatever I wanted and have that number of threads created. They would all be running an identical sub which does do not make calls of any kind to each other, they don't need knowledge of each other. Is anything like this possible?
How To Create X Number Of Threads Without Hardcoding
Sep 24, 2010[code]How do I create X number of threads without hardcoding?Eg. user decides the number of threads
View 1 RepliesSet Limit To The Number Of Threads For BackgroundWorker?
Mar 17, 2011Is there any way/property to set BackgroundWorker to execute only x number of threads?
View 1 RepliesWhat Is The Max Number Of Threads In The Thread Pool
Sep 22, 2009I've been reading up on multi-threading and just have a couple trivia questions that are ambiguous given my sources:
1) What is the max number of threads in the thread pool? The number 25 is used but I have on reference that says 25 per CPU and another that says 25 per core. I realize that both can be right but before I start making flagrant design decisions I'd like some validation.
2) Let's say I'm in the body of a delegate and I call a function or sub. Does that function/sub remain in the thread or does it revert to the parent thread? I'm guessing the former would be much easier to implement so that's probably what MS did but you just can never tell.
.net - Using GDI+ With Multiple Threads?
Apr 18, 2010it would be best if I just copy and pasted the code (it's very trivial).
Private Sub Main() Handles MyBase.Shown
timer.Interval = 10
timer.Enabled = True
End Sub
[code]....
An exception, "The object is currently in use elsewhere", is raised during the tick event.
1 To N Thread - Show A Definite Number Of Threads?
Sep 3, 2009Does anyone have a 1 to n thread example in which n threads are created dynamically? There are a number of examples that show a definite number of threads, and some that imply n threads by using a tcp ip listener or a file system listener. However, I'm looking for a 1 to n created in response to a dynamic requirements, provided purely by and for my program.Essentially, my requirement is to be scalable. 1 to n threads based on application throughput should make this pretty easy to satisfy.
View 9 RepliesHow To Run Multiple Threads With BackgroundWorker
Jan 13, 2010I am writing a project in Visual Basic where I need to run several instances of the same method in parallel. I can do this using BackgrooundWorker by having several (4) copies of my code module (modules 1, 2, 3 and 4) with a call to background worker in each. I then have a Main form which invoke the 4 modules which setup 4 simultaneous background threads. Seeing as the code is the same I want to simply invoke the same module 4 times.
However when I do this I get an error from Backgroounworker that it is already busy. As I understand it this means that it is being shared. However, I have specifically instantiated it as "private" (private with events worker as new backgroundworker). I have tried running the same code in a Class instead of a Module but unless I make it public I have no way of invoking it from Main. I need to be able to pass each thread data from main for it to work on and if the class is private I cant invoke it.
How To Stop Multiple Threads
Nov 6, 2010This code will show you how I started multiple threads:
For i As Integer = 0 To 10
Dim MyThread As New System.Threading.Thread(New System.Threading.ThreadStart(AddressOf MySub))
MyThread.Start()
Next
Now I'm trying to stop the threads before closing my application but I don't know how to do that?
Run Ffmpeg With Multiple Threads?
Jan 25, 2012how to convert videos files using vb.net and ffmpeg. But as far as i know we cannot use multiple threads to run same exe file to convert files. Do you know how i can convert multiple videos using one external exe file (ffmpeg)?
I have not tried because my computer time was over. So iam just asking a general doubt whether if we attach it to one process then wouldn't the process get locked? Then can we multi-thread this application or not ?
VS 2008 - Multiple Threads - Get Two Value?
Jul 28, 2010I'm testing here something, but i don't know what's the best way to do this.I have a var that tells the application the number of threads that will be started, inside the thread/function that i call i need to return/get two values i have two sub functions, each one returns an integer.Then in the end i need to sum the values.
Example:
Thread1/Function
SF1 - Returns 2
SF2 - Returns 3
Thread2/Function
SF1 - Returns 1
SF2 - Returns 5
After all threads are over, i get the
SF1Total = 2 + 1 and
SF2Total = 3 + 5.
I'm thinking in using shared vars, and inside the function/subfunctions update the values. It's this a correct way to do it? Other question, the threads are assync, but i need to know when the last one finishes. How do i control this? The order they finish doesn't need to be the order they were called....
.net - Update From From Multiple Threads Of The Same Class?
May 31, 2012I have this class and I have a loop that launches multiple threads from the same class. This is all done from the main form.Now I want to update the richtextbox on the main from these classes.I have tried those begininvokes etc etc and nothing worked, no error but no output as well.Here the code for launching the threads :
Private PingObjects(100000) As Account 'Account is the class and login is the sub in it...
PingObjects(I) = New Account
Threads(I) = New Threading.Thread(AddressOf PingObjects(I).login)
[code]....
And to update the rtb, im using MainForm.log.text = "....." Nothing happens, no error.I have tried using the begin invoker method as well.
Creating And Aborting Multiple Threads
Sep 28, 2010To get pass the cross referencing error when running a thread, I use this code
[Code]...
But the AddressOf doesn't accept parameters... So how do I get pass that? Or is there another way to use delegate?
Dividing Work Into Multiple Threads?
Aug 10, 2011I've read a lot of different questions on SO about multithreaded applications and how to split work up between them, but none really seem to fit what I need for this. Here's how my program currently basically works:
Module Module1
'string X declared out here
Sub Main()
[Code]....
This is only a rough outline of what actually happens in my code by the way.
My problem being that if multiple threads start running Main2(), they're dealing with the same X value as in the other threads. The loop inside of main2 executes multiple times per millisecond, so I can't just stagger the loops. There is often duplication of work done.
How can I properly divide up the work so that the two threads running simultaneously never have the same work to run?
Implement Multiple Threads In Application
May 12, 2010I need help to implement multiple threads in application.Assume ds.table(0) has 5 and sometime 6 rows rows for i=0 to ds.tables(0).rows.count-1.I have to apply multiple threads, means all five/six rows should start at once using thead and "Process 1" .."Process 4" should also handled by threads.This is hierarchy that I have to apply with threads, how can I do it. It is requested to put piece of code so I can understand better.
View 13 RepliesSharing Data Between Multiple Threads?
Jul 7, 2011I know a little about threading and delegates, as well as socket programming. I'm working with a VB.NET-compatible SDK called TrueVision3D to create a small online game for me and my friends. The problem is that I cannot for the life of me figure out how to pass data from one thread to another. I've created 2 seperate threads on seperate forms.
The first thread is created on a form titled FrmLogin, and it contains all the socket code. I need to be able to update variables in the second thread, which mainly consists of a render loop. The second thread is created on a form titled FrmMain. I'm not quite sure if it matters what forms the threads are created on, I'm just trying to give as much information about the issue as I can. I've tried using delegates and events to pass information from the thread back to the form it was created on, which works fine, but how do I pass data to the second thread from the first?
Sharing Object Over Multiple Threads?
Aug 4, 2010I have an application that needs to perform a series of different actions at specific points in time.To do this I have a timer with various actions that occur in its tick event.One possible action is to send out a few messages via a serial port and then wait (between 1- 300 mins typically) for the next timer tick.Another possible action is to continuously toggle one of the control lines on the serial port until the next tick (again 1-300 mins).
In most instances, i'm happy for everything to run on the main thread, but in the case of toggling the line endlessly, I thought it better to give it its own thread.My problem is that for the new thread to use the Serial Port, it must open the port. Likewise, it must close it before the main thread can have it back.
Here are 2 code snippets
Private Sub activityTimer_Tick(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles activityTimer.Tick
Dim some variables here
activityTimer.Stop()
If speedThread.ThreadState = ThreadState.Running Then
[code]....
Using Multiple Threads For Faster Execution?
Jan 27, 2012I have a map image with data associated with the map indicated by RGB index. The data has been populated into an MS Access database. I imported the information in the database into my program as an array and sorted them to go in the order I want the program to run.
I want the program to find the nearest pixel that has a different color from the incumbent pixel being compared. (Colors are stored as string attributes of object Pixel)
First question: Should I use integers to represent my colors instead of string? Would this make the comparison function run significantly faster?
In order to find the nearest pixel of different color, the program begins with all 8 adjacent pixels around the incumbent. If a nonMatch is not found, it then continues onto the next "degree", and in this fashion, it spirals out from the incumbent pixel until it hits a nonMatch. When found, the color of the nonMatch is saved as an attribute of incumbent. After I find the nonMatch for each of the Pixels, the data is re-inserted into the database
The program accomplishes what I want in the manner I've written it, but it is very very slow. After 24 hours, I am only about 3% through with execution.
Question Two: Does my program behavior sound about right? Is this algorithm you would use if you had to accomplish this task?
Question Three: Would it be appropriate for me to use threads in order to finish execution of the program faster? How exactly does that work?
Question Four: Would it be more "intelligent" for my program to find the nonMatch for each pixel and insert it into the database immediately after finding it? (I'm making a guess that this would be good in multi-threading, because while one record is accessing the database (to insert), another record is accessing the array of pixels (shared global variable in program).
Question Five: If threading is a good idea, I'm guessing I would split the records up into more manageable chunks (i.e. quarters), and have each thread run the same functions for their specified number of records? Am I close at all?
VS 2008 Multiple Threads Ending?
Jul 29, 2010In the same line of this thread Now i have a problem with the control of the ending threads. This is my
vb.net threadsEnded = 0 For j As Integer = 0 To numThreads - 1
[Code]...
Some times the application doesn't finish and if i pause the application i see that the threadEnded var doesn't have the correct value, seems like some thread doesn't update the value of the var.
VS 2008 Shared Sub And Multiple Threads?
Sep 4, 2010I have a created a class, which contains a sub routine.This sub routine, should ideally be accessable by objects which are not members of the class, so I would like to make the sub, a 'shared sub' (call it Sub1).
Question: I am using many threads and there will be possibly 100s of 1000s of threads all wanting to use Sub1 (which is at present, is not shared).At present Sub1 , is not a shared sub, so every time a thread wishes to use Sub1 , I am creating a (dummy) instance of the class and then applying Sub1, to that instance.
My program works flawlessly using the above technique.Question: If I were to turn Sub1 (which is not currently shared) into a shared sub, and directly had various threads calling Sub1, would there be any issues with locking, ie. would it possible for 2 threads to enter that thread and start overwriting variables, which another thread has written to?
NOTE: there are no shared variables/properties in Sub1 and all variables used in Sub1 are declared within the sub itself.
