Constraints On Generics With .Net?
Dec 14, 2011
I have the a function that is declared like so: Public Sub Modify(Of SIMType As {New, DAOBase})(ByVal obj As SIMType)
I also have a class called Products which is declared like so:
Public Class Products Inherits DAOBase
So as you can see, if I were to call this function like so:
Modify(Of Products)(new Products())
This would not be an issue. The issue actually arises when I try to cast the object being past in to its real type. For example: both do not work. I get a Value of type SIMTYPE cannot be converted to IMS.Products error. Im assuming this is because I am using generics. Is there a way to adjust my function to allow for a casting operation like I am trying to do? In the end, what I need is a reference of the actual type (Products in this case) to the object.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 9, 2011
There were three similar questions in StackOverFlow but none gave an answer.. If have found why this error in occurring but don't know the fix. I am using Strongly Typed Dataset for my project which is created as a dll for DAL. I have added the Sql Server Table into this dataset using the designer and has created a DataAdapter
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
Nov 1, 2009
Can some one explain what constraints are in this application?
View 11 Replies
Sep 17, 2010
Consider the following extension method:
<Extension()> _
Public Function Satisfies(Of T)(ByVal subject As T, ByVal specification As ISpecification(Of T)) As Boolean
Return specification.IsSatisfiedBy(subject)
End Function
This works as expected if subject is the exact class being operated on by the specification. However, if the specification is examining the super-class of T, this extension will not work unless subject is explicitly cast to the super-class. Is there a way I can avoid this? So far, the best I've been able to come up with is:
[Code]...
Since I (apparently) can't get this to work exactly as I'd like in VB.NET due to limitations in the language itself, is my second attempt the safest/most efficient way to do this?
View 2 Replies
Sep 13, 2010
I am starting to play with extension methods and i came across with this problem:In the next scenario i get a: "extension method has a type constraint that can never be satisfied"
Public Interface IKeyedObject(Of TKey As IEquatable(Of TKey))
ReadOnly Property InstanceKey() As TKey
End Interface
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
May 17, 2012
I'm trying to use a DataTable to get the schema of a SQL Server DB.But, when try to detect the ForeignKeys, the constraints collection only brings the UNIQUE constraints.
Private Sub ShowConstraints(ByVal tableName As String)
Dim table As DataTable = New DataTable(tableName)
Using connection As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection(GetConnectionString)
[code]....
How can I get the ForeignKey Constraints?
View 2 Replies
Feb 15, 2012
How do I add constraints to image resizing code? I want the image to be no larger then 165x146. The below code does not hold the constraint when image is 525x610.[code]
View 1 Replies
Feb 17, 2012
I am doing a projectin VB 2008..I ave list of data being displayed in listview and it gets stored in DB..The problem is,i am unable to filter particular data based on some constraints like date,client etc.. How can i filter data based on various constraints..As i am new to VB,
View 5 Replies
Mar 21, 2012
I have a generic function in VB.Net. I also have two classes called A and B. Is it possible to allow the generic constraints on my function to allow the Type to be either class A or B? Class A and B do not share any base classes except for object.
View 1 Replies
Sep 16, 2011
I'm working on my first real asp.net web application and I'm kind of stumped on the best place and method to trap and handle database constraint violations. Suppose I have a unique constraint on a column and a user inputs something that would violate that unique constraint. Do I catch it in the business layer by making a call to the database to check of the value exists for that column or do I let it go all the way to the database and let it throw an exception and handle that in my application?
I don't like the latter answer- because it makes sense to handle as much as you can in the business layer before it reaches the database. But it's also somewhat problematic as my application is driven by procedures that implement basic CRUD operations on all tables. So in order for me to enforce uniqueness in the business layer, I need to create a procedure for every possible constraint so I can do a look up before an update or insert. That just seems tedious... and I'm duplicating business rules as they exist in both the database and the business layer, so if something changes, not only do I have to change the database, but I have to change the procedure and the application code.
So is there a right way or a good way to enforce these database constraints in application code or should I be looking at a way to catch exceptions thrown by the database and present them in a user-friendly way?
View 2 Replies
Jul 31, 2010
I keep getting this error message (see image). What's weird is it's coming from a "typed" dataset that is bound to a DataGridView and even though I get this message, the DGV still loads with all the data. I've bound this dataset to the DGV thru the designer. Here is the line of code that is erroring out:
Me.adpItemMaster.Fill(Me.JewelryDBDataSet18.tblItemMaster)
I checked the table and the primaryKey for the tblItemMaster is unique for each row.
View 2 Replies
Mar 29, 2009
When I use the dataAdapter.fill(ds,tableName), it reports an error: "Failed to enable constraints."Yes, I changed the selectcommand.I know if I modified the selectcommand, and if it will take diffrent columns result, this error will be reported.
[Code]...
View 4 Replies
Aug 28, 2009
I'm trying to write a class that will be in charge of persisting application options. Since the options need to be persisted the values that I'm sent must be serialisable.
Initially I thought I've be able to write a method with a signature like this[code]...
View 4 Replies
Sep 11, 2009
I am getting headache analyzing what's causing this error message "Failed to enable constraints. One or more rows contain values violating non-null, unique, or foreign-key constraints."I have 7 different sections, each sections has the same subject component, one of which is CLUB. The error will only display for one particular section but for the rest of the sections, the program work fine. All sections uses the same code that's why I am very puzzled with the error. if the code works for the rest of the section one it fails for the one particular section?I have check my table (sql2005 express) and all the records are intact.The error is pointing on da.Fill(Me.Grading_Rpt_DataSet.tblEnrol)of the code below.
[Code]...
View 7 Replies
Jun 7, 2010
When I write the following statement in VB.Net (C# is my normal language), I get an "end of statement expected" referring to the "Implements" statement.
<Serializable()> _
<XmlSchemaProvider("EtgSchema")> _
Public Class SerializeableEntity(Of T As {Class, ISerializable, New}) _
Implements IXmlSerializable, ISerializable
...
End Class
The C# version that I'm trying to emulate is:
[Serializable]
[XmlSchemaProvider("MySchema")]
public class SerializableEntity<T> : IXmlSerializable, ISerializable where T : class, new()
{
....
}
View 1 Replies
Feb 15, 2012
I have datagridview1 binded to data Table1 (with binding source) . This data table1 is in relation with his child data table2.When I insert new record to table1 I want to refresh datagridview1.
If I use table adapter fill method I get error.TableAdapter1.Fill(Me.DataSet1.Table1) ' error error: Cannot clear table Table1 because ForeignKeyConstraint FK_Table1Table2 enforces constraints and there are child rows in Table2.
View 1 Replies
Jul 17, 2010
In my program I have an interface iGraphable that contains two properties: Abscissa and Ordinate. Then I have an xxxx class (actually more than one) implementing iGraphable and a ListOfxxxx class implementing BindingListView(Of xxxx).To draw graphs I have a Graph class with a property called Data whose type is BindingListView(of iGraphable).Why have I a cast exception when I pass a BindingListView(Of xxxx) to the Data property.
View 3 Replies
Jan 6, 2012
I have a function called Modify. It is delcared like so:Public Function Modify(Of SIMType As {New, DAOBase})(ByVal obj As DAOBase) As Boolean
You can see that this function is generic. It takes as a paramer a object that is a DAOBase or subclasses of DAOBase.Inside the modify function there is a call like so:
DAOToGP(obj)This is where the polymorphism comes into play. There are four or so subclasses I have created of DAOBase. I have written a DAOToGP() for each of these types. So in the Modify() function, when it calls the DAOToGP(obj), polymorphism should kick in and it should call the correct implementation of DAOToGP() depending on the type that I pass into Modify().
However, I get the following error:Error 20 Overload resolution failed because no accessible 'DAOToGP' can be called without a narrowing conversion:'Public Shared Function DAOToGP(distributor As Distributors) As Microsoft.Dynamics.GP.Vendor': Argument matching parameter 'distributor' narrows from 'SierraLib.DAOBase' to 'IMS.Distributors'.'Public Shared Function DAOToGP(product As Products) As Microsoft.Dynamics.GP.SalesItem': Argument matching parameter 'product' narrows from 'SierraLib.DAOBase' to 'IMS.Products'. C:Usersdvargo.SIERRAWOWIRESDocumentsVisual Studio 2010ProjectsSIMDev_2SIMIMSDVSIMLibGPGPSIMRunnerRunnersRunnerBase.vb 66 39 IMS
I am kind of at a loss here. I am not sure why it cant figure out which function to call.
View 2 Replies
Dec 8, 2010
I'm compiling a VB.Net 2.0 app (created in VS2008) using msbuild, and now I've added a generic return type, it's giving me the following:
Warning: Type library exporter
encountered a generic type instance in
a signature. Generic code may not be
exported to COM.
Having just spent ages removing all of the previous warnings, I don't really want to add a new one. Any idea how to get rid of it (aside from not using generics)?I don't know what details I'd put in the attribute, or what number to put in the project-level ignore list.
View 1 Replies
Nov 30, 2010
I'm trying to reduce code bloat, reduce errors and simplify codebehind by use of generics. In this case I'm applying generics to declaration of persistable properties. Persistance is implemented by My.Settings. Here's the code so far.
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
Apr 28, 2009
What are the situations and their associated benefits of using Generics over Inheritance and vice-versa, and how should they be best combined?I'm going to try to state the motivation for this question as best I can:I have a class as shown below:
[Code]...
Now suppose I have a repository that takes an InformationReturn argument, that has to strore different fields in a DB depending on the type of Info object T is. Is it better to create different repositories each for the type T is; one repository that uses reflection to determine the type; or is there a better way using inheritance capabilities over/with generics?
View 6 Replies
Dec 27, 2011
The codes below are exactly the same, except that one is C# and the other one is VB.Net.C# compiles just fine, but VB.Net throws the warning:
Interface 'System.IObserver(Of Foo)' is ambiguous with another
implemented interface 'System.IObserver(Of Bar)' due to the 'In' and
'Out' parameters in 'Interface IObserver(Of In T)'
Why does VB.Net show the warning and not C#? And most important, how can I resolve this problem?
Obs: I'm using .Net Framework 4 with Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate.
VB.Net Code:
Module Module1
Sub Main()[code]......
View 2 Replies
Oct 28, 2011
Names of entities have been altered to protect their identities...
I've created a class called AnimalSearch(Of AnimalType As Animal(Of Int32))
Public Class AnimalSearch(Of AnimalType As Animal(Of Int32))[code]...
View 2 Replies
Mar 9, 2011
I'm not sure if this is possible or not. I have a number of different classes that implement interface IBar, and have constructors that take a couple of values. Rather than create a bunch of almost identical method, is it possible to have a generic method that will create the appropriate constructor?
private function GetFoo(Of T)(byval p1, byval p2) as List(Of IBar)
dim list as new List(Of IBar)
dim foo as T
' a loop here for different values of x
foo = new T(x,p1)
list.Add(foo)
' end of loop
return list
end function
I get:
'New' cannot be used on a type parameter that does not have a 'New' constraint.
View 2 Replies
Apr 21, 2012
I have a VB6 project with about 100 custom collection classes which I want to convert to VB.Net. A typical example would be something like.
Class CAccounts
Private m_Accounts As New Collection
Public Sub Add(newItem As CAccount)
m_Accounts.Add newItem, newItem.IdKey
[code].....
All of the collection classes in the project use this standard approach. However, not all the properties/methods of the collection classes are actually used. Most of the collection are used in "for each" loops. Keyed access using the string key is quite common. Keyed access by index is much less common.
Ideally I'd like to take a standard approach to converting these classes. I don't really want to have to review each collection and it's usage to consider whether I need a List, Dictionary, etc. Some of these collection contain 100,000 objects, and some will only contain 10. However, on the other hand I don't want to cause performance problems by using a more complex structure where a simpler option would do.
Sticking with the old style Collection. So, it would be relatively easy to convert to VB.Net But, I'd rather move to the more modern structures.Have CAccounts Inherit KeyedCollection(Of String, CAccount). Fortunately most of the classes held in the collections do have the key as part of the class (eg CAccount.IdKey above). This seems to work well. However, relatively few classes will access the colelction by numeric index. So, perhaps this is overkill if I only want keyed access by the string key?Have CAccounts Inherit Dictionary(Of String, CAccount) for the classes where I don't need access by numeric index. The problem I have with this is that all the existing "for each" loops are like "for each account in accounts". I don't want to have to change all these occurences to something like "for each account in accounts.Values". Although perhaps I can get round this by changing the default property?Have CAccounts Inherit MyCollection(Of String, CAccount), where MyCollection is my own bespoke collection. This seems a bit too much hard work.
View 2 Replies
Feb 12, 2010
I'm working with some XML representations of data instances.I'm deserializing the objects using .NET serialization but something in my soul is disturbed by having to write classes to represent the XML.[code]
View 4 Replies
Nov 8, 2009
This is my problem:
<System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Extension()> _
Function CastAs(Of TSource As TTarget, TTarget)(ByVal array As TSource()) As TTarget()
Return Global.System.Array.ConvertAll(array, Function(src As TSource) DirectCast(src, TTarget))
End Function
View 10 Replies
Jul 28, 2010
I have a Class that is defined as
Public MustInherit Class Entity(Of T As Entity(Of T))
And various classes derived from it. I would like to have another class accept all of the derived objects as a property, but I cannot seeem to find a workable syntax. If it were a parameter of a sub, I could say
Public Sub Foo(T As Entity(Of T))(TheEntity As T)
I can't seem to get that to work for a property:
Public Property E(Of Entity(Of T))() As Entity(Of T)
Gives me "Type parameters cannot be specified on this declaration"
Public Property E() As Entity2008(Of T)
Gives me "Type Parameter T does not inherit from or implement the constraint type ..."Is there an acceptable way to do this or am I stuck with using a Set Sub and a Get Function?
View 2 Replies
Jan 20, 2011
Suppose I have an interface called IParseable(Of TParsed, TUnparsed) which requires two functions:[code]Is there a way that I can restrict TParsed and TUnparsed to be numeric types (for which operations like "*" and "+" are already defined)?The problem is that, when I try to implement my interface and define one of the functions, e.g.:[code]VS throws an error saying the "*" is not defined for TUnparsed. I understand that, since TUnparsed could be anything, but is there a way to restrict my generic such that, say, TUnparsed could only be Double, Integer, Long, etc? To require Control to be a TextBox (or maybe I don't understand that very well either). But, anyway, any idea or am I way off track? Just trying to get a hang of these interface thingies and generic types.
View 2 Replies
Jul 28, 2009
I am trying to write a generic function that generates an Xelement based on a list of objects, and a property of the object[code]....
View 3 Replies
