I am new to LINQ, but have been able to query SQL using LINQ to SQL and then I can data bind the results to a GRID or DROPDOWN LIST with no problem. What I would like to do is load a column into an array. I have seen examples for something like this in C#[code]...
View 12 RepliesI'm using VB.Net and have the following LINQ Query...
Dim ACFTTail5 = (From tailcounts In db.TailCounts _
Where tailcounts.Model = "UH-60A" _
Group tailcounts By _
tailcounts.Tail, tailcounts.Model _
[Code].....
But get the following error...
"Unable to cast object of type 'System.Data.Linq.DataQuery1[VB$AnonymousType_42[System.String,System.String]]' to type 'System.String[,]'."
How do i great dynamic linq query in VB.net?
View 3 RepliesI have the following problem: I select a customer from a dropdownlist and then the gridview should load all items of all orders of that customer. I have the following query:
Dim allorders = From ord In db.Orders
Where ord.CustomerID = Convert.ToInt32(CustomerDropDownList.SelectedValue)
[CODE]..............
I also tried to modify the query as follows:
Dim orderitems = From oi In db.OrderItems
Where oi.OrderNumber = (From From ord In db.Orders
[CODE]...........
But this does not work. I just started using LINQ.
I know that LINQ queries are deferred and only executed when the query is enumerated, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly when that happens.Certainly in a For Each loop, the query would be enumerated.What's the rule of thumb to follow? I don't want to accidentally enumerate over my query twice if it's a huge result.
For example, does System.Linq.Enumerable.First enumerate over the whole query? I ask for performance reasons. I want to pass a LINQ result set to an ASP.NET MVC view, and I also want to pass the First element separately. Enumerating over the results twice would be painful.It would be great to turn on some kind of flag that alerts me each time a LINQ query is enumerated. That way I could catch scenarios when I accidentally enumerate twice.
given this function:
Public Function Search(ByVal StartIndex As Integer, _
ByVal MaxResults As Integer, _
ByVal AccountNumber As String, _
ByVal LastName As String, _
[Code]....
instead of what I expected:
Select count(*) from remitline where lastname = "smith"
What am I doing wrong building up the where clause? I'm using Castle ActiveRecord 2.1
if there is that much of a performance gain in running a LINQ stored procedure versus a LINQ query?
View 1 RepliesI have to join two main tables, and I need to filter the results by elements in an ASP.NET web form. These filters are created on the fly so I have to use a lot of where extensions to filter the query. I want to execute the query with as optimized SQL as possible.
I am first doing a simple join between TW_Sites and TW_Investigators. Then there are two sub-tables that are involved. TW_InvestigatorToArea and TW_InvestigatorToDisease. While most of the where clauses are working fine, I have found a performance issue that won't be an issue right now, but will be an issue as the table gets bigger.
The arrays DiseaseCategories and DiseaseAreas would be the results of a CheckBoxList result.
Protected Sub LoadResults()
'Get Dictionary of Filters
Dim FilterDictionary As OrderedDictionary = Session.Item("InvestigatorFilterDictionary")
' Initialize LinqToSql
[code]....
Forgive my ignorance on this.I have this LINQ Query:Dim ngBikersDataContext As New CarBikeWalkDataContext
bikersList = (From c In ngBikersDataContext.Reg_Bikers _
Order By c.L_Name _
Select New Bikers() With { _
.BikerID = c.BikerID, _
.F_Name = c.F_Name, _
[Code]...
with the error "Overload resolution failed because no accesible 'Select' accepts this number of arguments."
Over the "NEW" I get an error " ')'expected."
We are doing a query against an in-memory collection of LINQ data objects. The wrinkle is that we are ordering by a column in a related table whose records have not necessarily been loaded yet (deferred loading:)
Dim oPkgProducts = _
From b In oBillPkg.BillProducts _
Where b.Successful.GetValueOrDefault(Common.X_INDETERMINATE) = _
[code]....
How do I add ROW_NUMBER to a LINQ query or Entity? How can I convert this solution to VB.NET?
[Code]...
I'm having trouble porting that last line. I have been unable to locate a VB.NET example. I'm actually not looking for any paging functionality like the example provides, just good old-fashioned Row_Number(Order By X) row index.
I was wandering is it possible to use a query within another query below is the code I am trying to use.
Public Function GetInventByComp(ByVal CompID As String) Using DC As New DataClassDataContext
'need to get company id's based off names? thats bad should be name from Id need to rethink this
Dim invent = (From C In DC.Inventors_Companies _
Where C.CompID = CompID _
Select C.InventorID).ToString
[Code]...
I was trying to us multiple values in a string like "1, 3, 5" but I can't seem to get that working either so I am trying to use just a single value now. Can anyone help me? "Yes I am new to this"
Can this be rewritten any better using LINQ? I'm a C#er trying to think in VB.NET for this current project. It's in an ASP.NET Web Forms .vb codebehind:
Public ReadOnly Property AllowedCategoryIds As Integer()
Get
Dim ids = New List(Of Integer)
[Code]....
I didn't think it fair to post a comment on Fredrik Mörk's answer in this 2 year old post, so I thought I'd just ask it as a new question instead..NB: This is not a critiscm of the answer in any way, I'm simply trying to understand this all before delving into memory management / the marshal class.
In that answer, the function GetByteArray allocates memory to each object within the given array, within a loop.Would the GetByteArray function on the aforementioned post have benefited at all from allocating memory for the total size of the provided array:
Dim arrayBufferPtr = Marshal.AllocHGlobal(Marshal.SizeOf(<arrayElement>) * <array>.Count)
I just wonder if allocating the memory, as shown in the answer, causes any kind of fragmentation? Assuming there may be fragmentation, would there be much of an impact to be concerned with? Would allocating the memory in the way I've shown force you to call IntPtr.ToInt## to obtain pointer offsets from the overall allocation pointer, and therefore force you to check the underlying architecture to ensure the correct method is used*1 or is there a better way? (ToInt32/ToInt64 depending on x86/64?)
*1 I read elsewhere that calling the wrong IntPtr.ToInt## will cause overflow exceptions. What I mean by that statement is would I use:
Dim anOffsetPtr As New IntPtr(arrayBufferPtr.ToInt## + (loopIndex * <arrayElementSize>))
I've read through a few articles on the VB.Net Marshal class and memory allocation; listed below, but if you know fo any other good articles I'm all ears![URL]..
I've been reading a fair bit about the performance of using LINQ rather than using a for each loop and from what I understand using a LINQ query would be a little bit slower but generally worth it for convenience and expressiveness. However I am a bit confused about how much slower it is if you were to use the results of the query in a for loop.
Let's say that I have a set called 'Locations' and a set of objects called 'Items'. Each 'item' can only belong to one 'location'. I want to link items that are under the same location to each other. If I were to do this using a normal 'For Each' loop it would be something like this:
For Each it as Item in Items
If it.Location.equals(Me.Location)
Me.LinkedItems.Add(it)
End If
Next
However if i was to use LINQ it would instead be this:
For Each it as Item in Items.Where(Function(i) i.Location.equals(Me.Location))
Me.LinkedItems.Add(it)
Next
is the second (LINQ) option going to loop once through the entire 'Items' set to complete the query, then loop through the results to add them to the list, resulting in essentially two loops, or will it do the one loop like the first (For Each) option?
Is it possible to do the following? [code] Basically I have one Load_Gridview function that is called on all postbacks, and rather than creating a bunch of different cases.I want the filters to stack.My actual code has more filters set up (4 or 5 of the).It all compiles ok but when I run and try to execute with active checked, or a department selected I get the following error. [code]
View 4 RepliesI have below XML file
<?
xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><
PageFlow>
<
attributegroup name="Search"><
attributes>
[Code]...
I am looking to sum the "Status" field.
Dim _detailRecords As New DataTable
_detailRecords.Columns.Add("y")
_detailRecords.Columns.Add("z")
[Code]....
I'm also wanting to keep this as an IEnumerable of DataRow because I will be creating a datatable from it with
Dim yyyyy As DataTable = query8.CopyToDataTable
I am Fairly new to Linq and I am trying to write a simple query to return the error messages within my xml file.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Error xmlns="urn:xxxxx">
The following errors were detected:
[code].....
if I run this under c#
from p in Addresses where p.Address2 == null select p.AddressID
it generate this query
SELECT [t0].[AddressID]
FROM [dbo].[Address] AS [t0]
WHERE [t0].[Address2] IS NULL
if I run this under vb.net
from p in Addresses where p.Address2 = nothing select p.AddressID
it generate this query
SELECT [t0].[AddressID]
FROM [dbo].[Address] AS [t0]
WHERE [t0].[Address2] = ''
p.Address2 is a varchar field that accept null value
why vb.net is "wrong" ?
I'm converting the Linq query below from C# to VB.Net. Can you spot my error? The query joins 3 XML datasets. C# - This one works great.
List<Course> courses =
(from course in CourseXML.Descendants(ns + "row")
join coursecategory in CourseCategoryXML.Descendants("Table") on (string)course.Attribute("code") equals (string)coursecategory.Element("DATA")
[code]....
I have been trying the following but it returns unexpected results:
Dim xd As XDocument = _
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<root>
[code].....
The above result returns both 'element' nodes however it should only return the first where element/subelement@id=1/subsubelement@id=3 However if results.Ancestors. is used it returns the correct 'subelement' and if that line is not included it returns a single 'subsubelement' whih is also correct I don't understand why when mvoing to the 'element' it returns both (I realise both have a subelement with id=1 but I thought each further query would filter out the presvious results)?
I have a List of Price Objects (Price contains Date, High, Low) and am trying to extract monthly averages via LINQ. I have this working in C# but we have a few legacy applications that need it in VB.Net and I can't quite seem to figure out the conversion. I've even tried breaking it into two queries to no avail.
[Code]...
Ok im trying to do a if statement in Linq and was wondering if it was possible to do something like:
Dim loadFriends = From p In db.UserRelationships Where p.aspnet_User.UserName = User.Identity.Name _
Or p.aspnet_User1.UserName = User.Identity.Name And p.Type = 1 _
Select New With {if p.aspnet_user1.user = "a certan username" then .username = _
p.aspnet_user.username else .username = p.aspnet_user1.Username}
[Code]...
Dim query = From o In myContainer.MyObjects Select o.MyStringProperty Distinct
Dim myProperties As List(Of String) = query.ToList????? 'no way!!!'
"query" type is IEnumerable(Of String)
I tried to use the query directly as a DataSource of a (infragistic) combobox, but it throws me NullReferenceException, so I decided to convert it to a listof strings, to be a more "classical" datasource.
Dim values As List(Of String) = query.AsQueryable().ToList()
does not work either: Value of type 'System.Collections.Generic.List(Of System.Linq.IQueryable(Of String))' cannot be converted to 'System.Collections.Generic.List(Of String)'.
user.fld_usr_name is a string with the value random name user is an object that is given as a parameter
ByVal user As GUser
this is the linq query that doesn't work
Dim result = (From usr In users Where usr.Name.Contains(user.fld_usr_name) Select usr).ToList()
this is the one that works
Dim result = (From usr In users Where usr.Name.Contains("random name") Select usr).ToList()
this is the error
Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
I am using this in Linq to Active Directory library which probably means it's linq to entities I've tried everything?
In this query against a datatable i'm trying to do some conditional filtering.The check against Timeband(index N) should only be done when the Index exists. (the base code only had three item fields, i've converted them to a simple list)
Dim res As DataTable =
(
From dr As DataRow In dtTimedRow.AsEnumerable()
Select dr
[code]....
The above code triggers an Exception if the count = 1. It executes the code next to imeBands.Count > 1 which it should not. What would be the correct solution for this code.In the mean time i've added a simple filter function.
I have this query that I tried to join 2 tables together, one which holds the product name, and product numbers, and take a product number, and go to the other where to find a Art_no which is like the product number.[code]
View 2 RepliesI am converting a c# LINQ example:[code].....
In the above C# the g is an IGrouping but in the VB below it's instead an IEnumerable and thus the g.Key isn't resolving.[code]....
I have the following query in VB, but I do not know how to translate it to C# synatax
Dim q = From c In db.Customers
Group Join o In db.Orders On c.CustomerID Equals o.CustomerID Into orders = Group
Select New With {c.ContactName, .OrderCount = orders.Count()}