Performance Gain In LINQ Query Vs LINQ Stored Procedure?
Aug 6, 2009if there is that much of a performance gain in running a LINQ stored procedure versus a LINQ query?
View 1 Repliesif there is that much of a performance gain in running a LINQ stored procedure versus a LINQ query?
View 1 RepliesI have written a stored procedure like this:
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[TestProcedure]
AS
BEGIN
SELECT TOP 1 CampaignID FROM Campaigns
SELECT TOP 1 ServiceID FROM Services ORDER BY ServiceID desc
END
In my .NET Project, I have a LINQ to SQL file (.dbml) and I have drag-and-dropped this procedure to create a new class TestProcedureResult:
Partial Public Class TestProcedureResult
Private _CampaignID As Integer
Public Sub New()
[Code]....
So it is not returning ServiceID. How can I retreive ServiceID using LINQ to SQL? I know we can customize stored procedure calls, but how can I customize in this particular scenario?
Can convert this c# code to vb.net code.
DataClassesDataContext dc =
new DataClassesDataContext();
//proc_GetExistProductDetails is a Stored procedure method from my DataContext class.
[CODE]...
How can I pass stored procedure name dynamically to Linq-to-SQL, vb.net and get the result into a datatable.
View 2 RepliesI have a combobox named cbEmpState, I need to call a stored procedure named 'spStateList' and have it fill the combobox. I'm having a hard time finding examples of this online. The stored procedure is in my dbml file.
Here's the stored procedure
ALTER PROC spStateList
AS
SELECT * FROM states ORDER BY StateName ASC
My application produces this error System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Login failed for user..This started after I added a stored proc in my dbml file. It works fine in my local enviroment, but throws that error when deploy to staging sever. the user it displays is foreign to me?
View 1 RepliesI have a stored procedure in DBML and I try to pass the result to "sqlQryArray" as an array(1 dimensional array). But the bottom code causes error like below message. What else should be done?
Error 1 Value of type '1-dimensional array of aaaDatabase.stp_GetSomethingResult' cannot be converted to '1-dimensional array of String' because 'aaaDatabase.stp_GetSomethingResult' is not derived from 'String'.
The return result from stored procedure is a just list of first names of students(only one column)
Dim sqlQry = aaaLINQ.stp_GetSomething(bbb,ccc,ddd)
Dim sqlQryArray As String() = sqlQry.ToArray()
In my project I am using a LINQ to SQL class that contains a stored procedure which includes a string value as an output parameter.So to capture that, I created a string variable as follows in the procedure:Dim spOutput As String? However, when I do this I get the following message "Type 'String' must be a value type or a type argument constrained to 'Structure' in order to be used with 'Nullable' or nullable modifier '?'"
View 2 RepliesI have the following xml document which would be taken from the web and stored into an XDocument object.
[Code]...
given this function:
Public Function Search(ByVal StartIndex As Integer, _
ByVal MaxResults As Integer, _
ByVal AccountNumber As String, _
ByVal LastName As String, _
[Code]....
instead of what I expected:
Select count(*) from remitline where lastname = "smith"
What am I doing wrong building up the where clause? I'm using Castle ActiveRecord 2.1
I know that LINQ queries are deferred and only executed when the query is enumerated, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly when that happens.Certainly in a For Each loop, the query would be enumerated.What's the rule of thumb to follow? I don't want to accidentally enumerate over my query twice if it's a huge result.
For example, does System.Linq.Enumerable.First enumerate over the whole query? I ask for performance reasons. I want to pass a LINQ result set to an ASP.NET MVC view, and I also want to pass the First element separately. Enumerating over the results twice would be painful.It would be great to turn on some kind of flag that alerts me each time a LINQ query is enumerated. That way I could catch scenarios when I accidentally enumerate twice.
Forgive my ignorance on this.I have this LINQ Query:Dim ngBikersDataContext As New CarBikeWalkDataContext
bikersList = (From c In ngBikersDataContext.Reg_Bikers _
Order By c.L_Name _
Select New Bikers() With { _
.BikerID = c.BikerID, _
.F_Name = c.F_Name, _
[Code]...
with the error "Overload resolution failed because no accesible 'Select' accepts this number of arguments."
Over the "NEW" I get an error " ')'expected."
We are doing a query against an in-memory collection of LINQ data objects. The wrinkle is that we are ordering by a column in a related table whose records have not necessarily been loaded yet (deferred loading:)
Dim oPkgProducts = _
From b In oBillPkg.BillProducts _
Where b.Successful.GetValueOrDefault(Common.X_INDETERMINATE) = _
[code]....
How do I add ROW_NUMBER to a LINQ query or Entity? How can I convert this solution to VB.NET?
[Code]...
I'm having trouble porting that last line. I have been unable to locate a VB.NET example. I'm actually not looking for any paging functionality like the example provides, just good old-fashioned Row_Number(Order By X) row index.
I'm overloading a vb.net search procedure which queries a SQL database.One of the older methods i'm using as a comparison uses a Stored Procedure to perform the search and return the query.My new method uses linq.I'm slightly concerned about the performance when using contains queries with linq. I'm looking at equally comparable queries using both methods.Basically having 1 where clause to Here are some profiler results;
Where name = "ber10rrt1"
Linq query : 24reads
Stored query : 111reads
[code]....
Forgetting for a moment, the indexes (not my database)... The fact of the matter is that both methods are fundamentally performing the same query (albeit the stored procedure does reference a view for [some] of the tables).Is this consitent with other peoples experiance of linq to sql? Also, interestingly enough;Using like "BER10%"
resultset.Where(Function(c) c.ci.Name.StartsWith(name))
Results in the storedproc using 13125reads and linq using 8172reads?
These 2 ways of working both work, but I'm wondering if there's a difference in performance:
Dim collection As ItemCollection = CType(CellCollection.Where(Function(i) i.IsPending = True), ItemCollection)
For Each item As Item In collection
'Do something here
Next
and
For Each item As Item In CellCollection.Where(Function(i) i.IsPending = True)
'Do something here
Next
I thought the second one was better as you'd have a variable less and looks cleaner, but on second thought, I'm not quite sure what happens when you put a linq query in the iteration.
from a performance point of view is it faster to work with linq to sql or dataset.datatable?
View 6 Repliesi have 3 tables t1,t2,t3..if i update t1,t2 and t3 must also be updated.i have just been tried
UPDATE t1,t2,t3 SET t1.f1='sample',t2.f1='sample',t3.f1='sample' WHERE t1.f1='test' and t2.f1='test' and t1.f1='test'
using this,update fails if t2 and t3 could not find 'test' in their fields,if i use OR all records will be..i have also tried JOINS
Update tbl_maincat AS m LEFT JOIN tbl_maincat AS m2 ON m.cTitle = m2.cTitle,
tbl_main AS c LEFT JOIN tbl_main AS c2 ON c.MainCat = c2.Maincat,
tbl_subcat AS s LEFT JOIN tbl_subcat AS s2 ON s.csCat = s2.csCat
[code]....
ODP.NET Query - Error manipulating data from Stored Procedure??
View 3 RepliesI am new to LINQ and trying to learn it. I have a stored proc which returns XML Raw and I need to call this proc using VB.NET and LINQ...
View 3 RepliesI am trying to use stored procedures with LINQ to SQL to perform insert, update, and delete operations. My update and delete procedures implement optimistic concurrency by checking the original values retrieved from the database with the current values in the database. A row count is returned to indicate if the row was updated. When I execute SubmitChanges on the data context to update the database, everything works fine except that the generated code doesn't check for concurrency. (I configured the insert, update, and delete operations to use the data context methods created from the stored procedures using the O/R Designer, and I assigned the original object properties to the method arguments.) I can customize the generated code so it works properly, but I know that I shouldn't do that because I'll lose the changes if the code is regenerated. I also know that I can add a partial class to extend the data context, but I don't know how to implement the methods correctly. All I really need to do is to have the methods return the row count, but, of course, that's not an acceptable method overload. I know that I can also call the methods directly rather than calling SubmitChanges, but it seems like this is intended to work with SubmitChanges.
View 8 RepliesI have to join two main tables, and I need to filter the results by elements in an ASP.NET web form. These filters are created on the fly so I have to use a lot of where extensions to filter the query. I want to execute the query with as optimized SQL as possible.
I am first doing a simple join between TW_Sites and TW_Investigators. Then there are two sub-tables that are involved. TW_InvestigatorToArea and TW_InvestigatorToDisease. While most of the where clauses are working fine, I have found a performance issue that won't be an issue right now, but will be an issue as the table gets bigger.
The arrays DiseaseCategories and DiseaseAreas would be the results of a CheckBoxList result.
Protected Sub LoadResults()
'Get Dictionary of Filters
Dim FilterDictionary As OrderedDictionary = Session.Item("InvestigatorFilterDictionary")
' Initialize LinqToSql
[code]....
I'm using Linq to Sql and have a stored proc that won't generate a class. The stored proc draws data from multiple tables into a flat file resultset. The amount of data returned must be as small as possible, the number of round trips to the Sql Server need to be limited, and the amount of server-side processing must be limited as this is for an ASP.NET MVC project. So, I'm trying to write a Linq to Sql Query however am struggling to both replicate and limit the data returned. Here's the stored proc that I'm trying to convert:
[Code]....
I's there a way that I can access the properties of all controls stored into my array of object using LINQ.
Public Sub DisAble(Byval ParamArray ctrlCollection() As Object)End Sub That is my sub routine where im trying to reset all controls that will stored into that object of array. But im trying to attain that using LINQ so I wont use any loops to access all of it.
The store procedure which give me the information I need is:
USE [UCSMIS]
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
[Code].....
When I try to add it to my report it gives an error, is it because of the temp table and how should I go about it?
I've been reading a fair bit about the performance of using LINQ rather than using a for each loop and from what I understand using a LINQ query would be a little bit slower but generally worth it for convenience and expressiveness. However I am a bit confused about how much slower it is if you were to use the results of the query in a for loop.
Let's say that I have a set called 'Locations' and a set of objects called 'Items'. Each 'item' can only belong to one 'location'. I want to link items that are under the same location to each other. If I were to do this using a normal 'For Each' loop it would be something like this:
For Each it as Item in Items
If it.Location.equals(Me.Location)
Me.LinkedItems.Add(it)
End If
Next
However if i was to use LINQ it would instead be this:
For Each it as Item in Items.Where(Function(i) i.Location.equals(Me.Location))
Me.LinkedItems.Add(it)
Next
is the second (LINQ) option going to loop once through the entire 'Items' set to complete the query, then loop through the results to add them to the list, resulting in essentially two loops, or will it do the one loop like the first (For Each) option?
Is it possible to do the following? [code] Basically I have one Load_Gridview function that is called on all postbacks, and rather than creating a bunch of different cases.I want the filters to stack.My actual code has more filters set up (4 or 5 of the).It all compiles ok but when I run and try to execute with active checked, or a department selected I get the following error. [code]
View 4 RepliesI have below XML file
<?
xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><
PageFlow>
<
attributegroup name="Search"><
attributes>
[Code]...
I am looking to sum the "Status" field.
Dim _detailRecords As New DataTable
_detailRecords.Columns.Add("y")
_detailRecords.Columns.Add("z")
[Code]....
I'm also wanting to keep this as an IEnumerable of DataRow because I will be creating a datatable from it with
Dim yyyyy As DataTable = query8.CopyToDataTable
I am Fairly new to Linq and I am trying to write a simple query to return the error messages within my xml file.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Error xmlns="urn:xxxxx">
The following errors were detected:
[code].....