I have been thrown in at the deep end with an existing VB.NET project at work. I have never used VB.NET before so I am struggling a little. Does anyone know how to solve the following.I need to pass an instance to client side and then pass it to a shared method in order to access instance methods from when the shared method.The starting point is a fileupload control within the HTML of my Contacts.aspx file:
The onchange event calls a javascript method, see below, this uses AJAX PageMethods to called a Shared method in my code behind This is the script code which is in my Contact.aspx file
[Code]...
If anyone knows the solution please could they update the code as I probably won't be able to understand if you just give a description. I just hope I am along the right tracks.
If I have a very large function/sub in a class that is an instance method (i.e., not Shared), do I gain or lose anything by moving that to a shared method and then declaring a small stub method for the instance use?
I.e., I go from this: Public Sub MyBigMethod(ByVal Foobar As String) If String.IsNullOrWhitespace(Foobar) Then Throw New ArgumentNullException("Foobar") End If [Code] .....
My thinking is I save on memory size per each instance of the object. Because each instance only has to lug around the stub method which handles calling the shared version and passing an instance of itself to the shared method so that it can do whatever it needs to do. But I'll wager that I sacrifice a very teensy amount of speed because of the added function call overhead.
It works, when I make getBar methods public, but I don't want to expose these unneccessarily. Why I can't call private shared methods from a public one in the same class is over my head. I'm using .net framework 4.0 in a web application.
Given in the following language specification, for me at least, calling Db.Foobar() [In the following code] does not indeed call off to the Shared Constructors of the base classes. I am curious as to a) is this my own fault for doing something wrong or b) is this an error in the language specification[code]...
I have an ASP.NET MVC controller action with the following VB.NET signature:
[Code]...
If I'm trying to send an Ajax POST in jQuery to the ClosestCities action, what should my request look like? When I use the following code to POST to this action, in the debugger window of VS, position.longitiude and position.latitude are equal to 0.0 (0D):
I am using jquery so using ajax to post data, but for some reason when i click on submit, the page doesnt go from aspx to aspx.vb on the back side.here's my code -
new_class is my webmethod in the vb.net side. Now if i put an alert in the btnsave onclick function, i see the firstname value in the alert. But the page does not call the new_class function after that.
As I stated before in my Sorting questions.When is it advisable to use Shared Functions vs Instance Functions References.The problem I posed was that in a threaded application if I was sorting an array of 999999999 elements I typically want to call a shared function that handles this; however in .NET the way to sort is through a .Sort method which you pass an array to be sorted and a function handler; or Comparisson(t of).
My impression is that if in order to do a ClosestToN Sort I would have to calculate the value of N in the array first; then sort and then subtract the value of N from the sorted array.JohnH suggested passing the value of N as a Property in a Class that contained a reference to a sort Algorithm.The benchmark suggested in a 1 thread model it would work faster (which I knew that it would through math, but the accessors I was speculative on; I turned out to be wrong it worked fine either way).
My issue is in a Multi-Thread application creating instances for an accessor may cause memory to fill quickly if I am dealing with 1000's of threads.Is it better in this case to use a slower Shared function, then a faster Instance Function?
After I formatted my laptop and reinstalled Visual Studio 2005, I receive a lot of same error as below message. "Access of shared member through an instance; qualifying expression will not be evaluated" If I click the error, it direct me to the line and all 102 error suggest me to add "Windows.Forms." before "DialogResult.OK". Should I add something on "Reference"?
I would like to create a global instance of a User Class that can be referenced by all the forms in my MDI application.This object may be set during the login procedure by the Login form but the user attributes are to be available for other forms. For example, MyUser.ID will be required for meeting the audit requirements whenever data is changed.
Suppose I have a class of objects called Porky with a property called IsHuge:
Public Class Porky Public Property IsHuge As Boolean End Class
Now I want to make a special kind of Porky -- let's call it UberPorky -- for which I want to change ALL instances to either IsHuge or not IsHuge. What I'd like to do is this:
Public Class UberPorky Inherits Porky Public Overrides Shared Property IsHuge As Boolean
[code]....
The trouble is, I can't do that. I'm not allowed to reference MyBase or Me in a Shared property.
I have a List(Of AddlInfo) with AddlInfo being an object. I'm trying to pass addlInfoList by reference into a function of another class:
[Code]...
This works if I'm not passing the reference into another class, but when I try to do this, I get the following error: Overload resolution failed because no accessible 'Sort' can be called with these arguments:
how to pass system.type or a generic without much luck. I have two functions below one that works and the other that doesn't. I can't seem to make heads or tails of the VB syntax required for doing what I want to do.
' This function does not ' ' Also attempted it like this
' Public Shared Function UnserializeFromJSON(ByVal obj As String, ByRef ty As System.type)[code].......
Public Shared Function MyValue() As Integer Return 0 End Function Public Sub Code()
[Code]...
Me.MyValue gives a warning in VB.NET and (the equivalent code gives) an error in C#. Is there a particular reason for this? I find it more intuitive/natural to access the shared function using 'Me.MyValue' - but I avoid it to keep my warnings at 0. Did someone else just decide 'Nah, it makes more sense to do it the other way' or is there some technical reason I don't understand?
EDIT: I was thinking of it wrong, more like a 'sub class' in OOP. Even if something is declared in the base class, you access it through the instance you have. But that relationship is not the same with shared or static.
I want to extend the BitConverter class with an overload of ToString() that takes a parameter of type Char, representing a value delimiter.Why? By default, the ToString() call returns a string representation of a byte array, delimited by dash symbols. The signature does not allow you to specify a different delimiter, which I find very unfortunate.Now because this is not an instance type, or maybe because I'm overloading a shared method, I'm having a hard time finding the proper syntax to define my extension method.What am I doing wrong here, causing the overloads to not show up in IntelliSense:
What is the purpose of using shared methods that return an instance of a class, as opposed to a constructor?
ie: in VB.net, the system.drawing.color class has shared method "FromArgb(int, int, int) as color". This is different from java's implementation which simply is a constructor that takes three ints. Why the decision to do one or the other?
The context of this question is that I am trying to debug performance issues (apart from the obvious ones I already know about and can find).I inherited a code base (VB.NET) for an ASP.NET app. This is an app that was developed way back in .NET 1.1 days, and was the first .NET app for a lot of the developers who worked on it.
In this code base is a class called DatabaseUtility that contains several Shared Public methods as well as non-Shared Public Functions and Subs for CRUD operations to the database (SQL Server).
It is common in my "BL" that a method creates an instance of the DatabaseUtility which essentially figures out what the connection string should be and opens a connection, as well as giving the developer a handle to the other methods contained within it.Dim utility as New DatabaseUtility()
Once I have that, I start to create parameters that I am going to pass to one of the methods in DatabaseUtility (like GetDataSet). There is a Shared method in my DatabaseUtility called CreateParameter which does essentially that. It creates a SqlParameter object so I can add it to a Parameters collection.
Now, the code base is littered with a lot of this:
utility.CreateParameter(...)However, because CreateParameter is a Shared method, I am not sure what is going on behind the scenes. I know because it is a Shared member that an instance of the DatabaseUtility is not created when I call it like this:DatabaseUtility.CreateParameter(...)
However, because I am calling it from an instance (utility), does that change the behavior at all?
As the question states, can a shared method of an object be multithreaded? I don't quite having threading down in my skillset, otherwise I would test myself. On the other hand, I am involved in designing class that could be part of a multithreaded application in VB.Net.
I have a class that inherits from a base class (this contains a lot of common db related stuff amongst other things and is marked as MustInherit). I want to write a shared method in which I call a base class method, however the compiler gives me the message 'MyBase is only valid within an instance method'. This shared method is a logging method and will be used a lot within the app, I'm trying to avoid having to instantiate an object each time I want to call it.
Is it possible to access the base class methods from a shared method?
I have a utility class that creates & returns a db connection: Public Shared Function GetConnection() as OracleConnection dim c as New OracleConnection() ... set connection string... c.Open() Return c End Function Is there any risk of concurrent calls returning the same connection? The connection string enables pooling.
I have a new developer that is calling Showdialog (in VB.NET) on a Windows Forms form without first creating an instance of the form.How is this possible? I don't see a shared method for ShowDialog...
I'm not crazy about this approach either as it seems to me that the dialog will not be disposed until the application exits.What am I missing? Is this a new best practice?OK, Form2 is just a blank form.Public Class Form1 Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object,
ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click Form2.ShowDialog() End Sub End Class
I'm creating a Shared (static) method in ASP.NET MVC so it can be used by any controller in my project. This static method needs to generate a URL. I think I need to use System.Web.Mvc.UrlHelper, but I can't figure out how to call it from within a static method.The constructor seems to want a RequestContext.
I like to create an extension method to Image.FromStream Public Shared Function FromStream(ByVal stream As System.IO.Stream) As System.Drawing.Image
With possibility to cancel processing like Public Shared Function FromStream(ByVal stream As System.IO.Stream, ByVal CloseTask As ManualResetEvent) As System.Drawing.Image
