Below is the class with a property.
public class abc
{
public int MyProperty { get; private set; }
}
What's the benefit of typing private access modifier in setter ?
In VB.NET, what are the advantages of using the Property keyword rather than:[code]Coming from Java I tend to use this style rather than Property...End Property - is there any reason not to?
View 4 RepliesSo I was creating a little object model the other day and it turned on me that I could not use Private og Public inside the interface class.
View 3 RepliesI am programmer from some time only, I have certain doubts in fundamentals, could you please clarify on the following:Case 1:
[Code]...
Does case 1 and case 2 yield same result, I mean is a private value necessarily in there?, can we use property itself to use its own value in its Set and get statements?
I am trying to access the controls' properties on another form without having to modify the code of the other projec (the one containing the controls that I want to access) because it is already compiled as a DLL. In this DLL that I am trying to access, the functions/sub-procedures are all declared as private. Would there be any way of accessing the controls' properties without having to modify the DLL? Basically what I am trying to do is create a sort of console application wrapper for the DLL that would create a new instance of the DLL's form and then make certain checkboxes checked and click certain buttons. Basically, I am trying to automate the form as it currently exists.
View 7 RepliesIn C# I can do this: public string myProperty { get; private set; }This is referred to as an "automatic getter/setter" (from what I've heard). Does VB.NET support these? So far, with my properties, all I can do is this:
[Code]...
I have observed a behaviour in VB.net where property setters get called more often than seems necessary, in conjunction with calls to the sister setter method.
Public Class Form1
Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
Console.WriteLine("Calling WorkReferenceTypeByReference")
WorkReferenceTypeByReference(ReferenceTypeData)
Console.WriteLine("Called WorkReferenceTypeByReference")
[Code] .....
Note the spurious call to the property setter following the method execution. I am supposing this behaviour is produced as a safety measure against inadvertently modifying the underlying property, despite this potentially being the intent. This behaviour in the case of ByRef vs ByVal usage is easily solved by choosing appropriate ByVal keyword, however hase recently noticed a more insidious behaviour, one that has caused a stack overflow of repeated calls, since the setter call would update a value that called the getter only.
Public Sub DoSomething()
Dim a As New CustomObject(anotherObject.AProperty(getterArgument))
End Sub
Public Class AnotherObject
Public Property AProperty as SomeType
[Code] .....
In the previous example, calling DoSomething() would fire the AProperty getter method, but then after that usage, would fire the setter method, which by program logic calls DoSomething() again. It is the automatic calling of the setter that puzzles me.
I have classes structured like this:
[code....]
Is there a modifier I can use on property X in class D which will cause X to be returned as B from an instance of D and A from an instance of D that is evaluated as C?
[code...]
I have the following class:
Class MyClass
Property MyInteger as Integer
Set(ByVal value as Integer)
_MyInteger = value
[code]....
As I'm not using any validation etc in my Property, is there any advantage of using a Property in this case, or would it be neater to use:
Class MyClass
Public MyInteger as Integer
End Class
I'm creating an application and I want to pass on a string value from one form to the other.Is there an access modifier in VB 2008 EE that would allow me to do that?Example: I have a name such as Mike in one form, in a list box, and Mike has a file attached to it with different information.I then click on a button to load another form, where the name Mike will be passed on and will be used by my program to find the file and display all the information in the file of his name.
View 2 RepliesI was trying to access the following property using Reflection because I don't have the original source code (suppose this was decompiled through Reflector). It seems that something is special about it being "private virtual" or maybe because it has "_" in the beginning of the property. I can access all the other private properties no problem except this one. Just can't figure out what I am doing wrong:
private virtual String _MyProperty
{
get
[code]......
I was trying to access the following property using Reflection because I don't have the original source code (suppose this was decompiled through Reflector). It seems that something is special about it being "private virtual" or maybe because it has "_" in the beginning of the property. I can access all the other private properties no problem except this one.
private virtual String _MyProperty
{
get
{
[code]....
I've recently been updating a lot of my code to comply with proper n-tier architecture and OO programming, following examples from a book.I'm starting to get problems now because I don't fully understand the access modifiers.If I run the following code I get an error at the line
Dim clientFamilyDataAccessLayer As New ClientFamilyDAO
in the BLL at the point it creates an instance of the DAL. The full error message is: "The type initializer for 'ClientFamilyDAO' threw an exception. ---> System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object."
How do I use these function to create a list of ClientFamily objects that I can then work with?On my UI layer I'm creating a list of objects; ClientFamilies
Dim listOfClientFamilies As List(Of ClientFamily) = ClientFamily.GetClientFamiliesByKRM(selectedEmployee.StaffNumber)
This is the function in the BLL
Public Shared Function GetClientFamiliesByKRM(ByVal krmStaffNumber As Integer) As List(Of ClientFamily)
Dim clientFamilyDataAccessLayer As New ClientFamilyDAO
Return clientFamilyDataAccessLayer.GetClientFamiliesByKRM(krmStaffNumber)
End Function
and this is function in the DAL
Public Function GetClientFamiliesByKRM(ByVal staffNumber As Integer) As List(Of ClientFamily)
Dim currentConnection As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection(_connectionString)
Dim currentCommand As New SqlCommand
[code]....
I searched on the forum / Internet for the solution how a PropetryInfo object (of a Public property) can reveal if it has a Private Protected Setter ... it was all in vain .... all help I found was about how to "Set" value of a public property having a Private Setter.I would like to know if I have a PropertyInfo object of a public property, how would I know if its Setter is Non Public?
I tried, in a exception handling block, where I did a GetValue of the PropertyInfo object and then called SetValue by setting the same value back... but to my surprise it worked well and didn error out.
[Code]...
I Like .NET automatic properties, in C# it so easy to declare readonly property by declaring its set section as private like this:
public String Name{ get; private set; }
But when I tried that in VB.NET I was shocked that it is not supported as mentioned here and I have to write it as follows:
Private _Name as String
Public ReadOnly Property Name as String
Get
[Code].....
What the difference between these declarations in VB.NET, which one is preferred and Why?
Which one will affect compile time, runtime or performance at all?
I'm going to resolve this bug as "Postponed" as we won't have time to do it for VS2010, but I'm definitely interested in your feedback going forward.
View 6 Repliesin C#: public string Property { get; private set; } in VB?
View 3 RepliesI'm working on a Hazardous Materials label printing program. One of the options is to do an "NFPA" label. Since there are 4 values required with 4 or 6 options, the ratings are entered via radio buttons in a group box. That's working okay. I display values in the NFPA diamond as they're entered: left quadrant blue, top quadrant red, left yellow, bottom red. I'm having trouble with the label in which the rating will be displayed on top of a jpg diamond for the white. In this quadrant the text can be up to 4 characters. I can accept the text going into an adjacent block a little, but the corners of the label overlap into another quadrant/color. I reduced the font size which solved the overlap problem but the font is then too small and looks terrible. I tried to make the background of the label transparent to let the color come through correctly but that's not a valid value for label.background. I'm figuring that the transparent background is the best solution. What can I use that will accept a transparent background so the color shows through?
I'm trying to set the transparent property via label properties properties, not via code. Here's the code if it makes any difference:
Public Class NFPA
Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
Close()
End Sub
[code]....
I come from C# (use VS 2005, .NET 2) and I know that when I declare a private variable I can "extract" from it the corresponding "property". In VB.NET I've declared a lot of properties (in the diagram class designer). Now am I forced manually adding the corresponding private fields?
View 4 RepliesI have a bunch of private variables I've typed out and I want to put all of my corresponding Public ReadOnly Properties in a bunch below them.Is there some way of copying ten lines of
Private _myVar As String
and pasting in ten sets of
Public Readonly Property MyVar As String
Get
Return _myVar[code]....
I'm currently copying the whole bunch of variable declarations, Find+Replacing Private _ into Public ReadOnly Property then going line-by-line expanding the definitions and writing return statements.how to avoid all this nonsense in the future, as I'm developing on a virtual terminal server, and the input lag on my little copy/paste/type operations on the code is driving me up the wall.
I am trying to use fluent nhibernate in a MVC project. It seems the entities should have properties that are virtual and the set should be private for IDs. I use vb language. So tried using overrideable. It gives an error...
Public Overridable Property DesignId() As Integer
Get
End Get
Private Set(ByVal value As Integer)
End Set
End Property
It says property cannot be overrideable because it has a private accessor.
is there a way to have the Get part of a property available as public, but keep the set as private?Otherwise I am thinking I need two properties or a property and a method, just figured this would be cleaner.
View 3 RepliesI just stumbled over this in some C# code...:public Foo Foo { get; private set; }
View 2 RepliesI'd like to have a Private or Protected "Setter" for a property that also happens to be an abstract (MustOverride). I'm porting some code from C# to VB and in C# this is pretty straight forward. In VB not so much (for me anyway).
Some code...
In C#...
public abstract class BaseClassWithAnAbstractProperty
{
public abstract int AnAbstractIntegerProperty { get; protected set; }
}
[Code]....
The issue seems to be the inability to flesh-out the Get/Set specifics in the declaration.
I'm using VS2008 and have created a dll with the following
Public Class Test
Private privatesampleProperty As String
Public Property SampleProperty() As String
Get
[code]....
From what I can see this should not be visible outside the class...
I've reviewed the links that were offered and don't find an answer. Neither has a lot of searching helped, probably because I can't think of a reasonably short way to ask the question. I hope that I've at least found the proper forum and category.
In my VB 2010 code, I've defined a structure that has about 30 elements. I want to sum the properties (they are all singles) of two members of the corresponding collection. I understand that I can do something like:
member1.property1=member2.property1+member 3.property1 for the entire set of properties of member2 and member3 to produce a completely defined member1 What I wonder is whether or not there is a way that uses fewer lines of code - I know that I can't do:member1=member2+member3, for example.
Is it possible to set a variable in my custom class for Private Read/Write access and Public Readonly access without creating Properties with Get and Set? In other words, from within my class I want full access and from my form I only want read access. Right now I declare my variable as either Private or Public to control Public read/write access. I tried googling my question a bit but I'm not sure what the correct terms even ar
View 5 RepliesCan i have a property that is Readonly for Public but can Read/Write in Private?
View 4 RepliesWhen referencing class properties from a function within the class do you use the value from the actual property or the private variable value?
public class
private m_Foo as double
public property Foo() as double
[Code].....
How do I convert the following? I'm porting a vb 6 app to vb .net.
Public Property Get Width() As Long
Width = m_lWidth
End Property
Public Property Let Width(ByVal value As Long)
m_lWidth = value
[Code]...