what's the vb.Net counterpart of the following blocks in Csharp?
public class NullableDateTimePicker : System.Windows.Forms.DateTimePicker
{
Default Constructor
public NullableDateTimePicker() : base()
{
[code].....
what's the vb.Net counterpart of the following blocks in Csharp?
[Code]...
We are converting a VB6 project to VB.net 2005. The VB6 project used Interop.Scripting.Dll reference.
We do not want to use this Interop.Scripting.Dll in our VB.Net project. find the .Net Counterpart of Scripting.Dll so that we do not require to build our .Net project with the old scripting dll reference?
We are using Scripting.FileSystemObject and Scripting.TextStream of Interop.Scripting.Dll. What is the equivalent .net counterpart of these objects in VB.Net 2005.?
The below is a snippet from VB that I am porting to a C# rewrite. My question is what is receipt_date after the assignment? Is it still an object or is it a string?
Dim receipt_date As Object
receipt_date = CType(dr.Item("RECTDT"), String)
Would this be the correct C# counterpart?
object receipt_date;
receipt_date = dr["RECTDT"].ToString();
After both of these execute would the VB version, receipt_date be equal to the C# version?
What the vb.net code should be of below c sharp code? [code]
View 1 RepliesI have been trying to design a custom tabcontrol in vb.net used a codeproject example to develop the said tabcontrol but the example is in C# I have converted all parts and theres only one error i cant seem to work around
[Code]...
if this is the wrong section since my result code will ve in vb thats why i posted it here.
i want to know how I could run a Csharp form from a VB project by pressing on a button.
View 6 RepliesVB.NETbyte[] packetTemp;
packetTemp[1] = (byte)pSize1;
return new byte[0];
CSharp (converted but i don't think they are correct):Dim packetTemp As Byte();
Return New Byte() {0}
I have some code that was written in C# and am attempting to convert it to VB.Net, for the most part things have gone well but I am running into an issue that I am not sure how to handle. The project has several classes and a few namespaces defined. The issue is [or seems to be] related to the namespace usage.
In the C# code of one class I have
Code:
namespace GdiPlusLib
In another class I have
Code:
using GdiPlusLib;
When translated to VB I have in the first class above
Code:
Namespace GdiPlusLib
and the following in the other class from above.
Code:
Imports GdiPlusLib
I get the following warning message on the imports line
Namespace or type specified in the Imports 'GdiPlusLib' doesn't contain any public member or cannot be found. Make sure the namespace or the type is defined and contains at least one public member. Make sure the imported element name doesn't use any aliases. There is another instance with a different namespace that gives the same warning and I get 11 errors all of which would seem to be related to the two warnings.
I am wondering if VB.NET has the "|=" Operator that is present in CSharp or if it goes by another name.
View 8 Repliesi am making a Reflector,I want Some help with generating Blocks of Code(Loops,Branching,using Blocks,Switch Case Blocks etc).Until now i am able to convert IL to expressions and identifying startoffset and endoffset of a Code Block for Generating Code Blocks..The Trouble i am facing is Identifying the Initializer, Incrementer and Condition in a For Next Loop. which are contained between the StartOffset and EndOffset as Expressions. [code]
View 1 RepliesI need to know how to decode GIF pixel blocks. The example block that they are using look like this "00 51 FC 1B 28 70 A0 C1 83 01 01" and i cant under stand how they converts that to "100 028 0FF 103 102 103 106 107 101" !?!?I mean... 00 51 FC 1B 28 70 A0 C1 83 01 01 === 00000000 01010001 11111100 00011011 00101000 01110000 10100000 11000001 10000011 00000001 00000001 if I read that like 9bit each it no way I get this result != "100 028 0FF 103 102 103 106 107 101" ?
View 12 RepliesI am working on a project that requires that I use nested case blocks. However, I am not quite sure what this looks like. And for whatever reason I'm having a hell of a time trying to find the answer through google. Are nested case blocks like nested if blocks? Or are they something completely different? More information on the project can be given if needed.
View 10 RepliesSo you know how when you call "Form.ShowDialog" from where ever you call it, it blocks until the form being displayed closes. And then the function returns whatever result it was.I want to know how to block like, but without a form, yet still have the "main ui thread".Basically I have this long process that needs to thread out and do several things... and it's heavily event based. It jumps between two threads, the main ui thread, and it's own background thread. The main ui thread needs to have access so that I can randomly open different dialog boxes for things... sometimes they're just windows asking to hit OK or Cancel to continue, others it's to perform some action, etc etc.
But there is NO central form related to it. It's a complete background thread running that randomly hops over to the main ui thread for things.Right now I have this class I designed called lets say "DoJobProcessor". On it is a function called "BeginDoJob" that threads off from the thread pool... when ever I need to jump back I use a ManualResetEvent to block on the background thread, jump over to to the main thread with "invoke" and passing a reference to the MRE, then release the block when done there and continue on on this background thread.
All while this is going on I just set the form I'm trying to block the main ui thread from managing by just setting its Enabled property false.It all feels just messy and annoying... and I was just writing something using ShowDialog and I was like... HEY, what if I could block this BeginDoJob method, hi-jack the main ui thread, then let that function return the result when done instead of having this "Complete" event with the return value in it. It's obviously possible because ShowDialog does it, but I don't know how.
This way the job I'm performing isn't always waiting for the main ui thread, instead its the other way around... the ui thread waiting for it, the way it aught to be. Show something, branch off do some stuff and just idle the display while it does it, come back show something else, branch off and just idle while it does that.
Im working on a somewhat major program for my work. Just in short, im reading in a text file but i then want it to break the text file into blocks. I will put a quick snip of it here:
(11/64"*DRILL*FOR*10-24*TAPPED*HOLES)
N7G91G30Z0.0M19
G90T7
[Code].....
So i figured id see what the pros could tell me. I have a couple good links, one for a regex cheat sheet but i just dont have a very good understanding of regex.
i want to create an application for inserting blocks from vb into cad,
i want a form with buttons on, the buttons will have the block names on, when you click
on the buttons the blocks will go into the drawing that is open
because i am new to this i dont no where to start
What is the convention in VB when a sub requires that a try/catch block succeed in order to function, but the catch block doesn't bubble the exception up?
I could put all of the code into the try block, but this seems messy since most of it doesn't need to be tried, it just needs the try to have succeeded.
For example, should the catch block exit the sub? This would work in my current situation, and if it is the proper procedure, let me know, but what about the more general scenario where both both success and failure require additional processing?
I am using a WebBrowser to load a webpage. In that page, there are several links. When clicking on one, it opens and then immediately closes. IE7's popup blocker is set to allow all from this site, nor does it work even if the popup blocker is completely disabled. I have no other blocker running.
how I can make these windows stay open?
I just did some analysis by using a global function which is called GetCallingMethod in my case.
Mostly it works great. But some cases the application is blocked. It is blocked when closing the application. When going to "pause" in Visual Studio, it stays on the new StackTrace line forever.
In my application I am using third party references, multithreading and several classes. But all that should not be a problem and should not lock the tracer class as far as I imagine. I am using Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate in this case.
This line will never be left in development area. Application will is frozen. Try/Catch will not force the procedure.
I have a windows form that imports data from an xls file to sql2005. I have a browser button, a dropdown list for the sheet names in excel and a process button. Now the excel file has 3 sheets (sheet1, sheet2, sheet3) the columns and data type are not the same so I need 3 different queries to access this file,
I think about CASE, but not very sure,
So if dropdown list.selectedvalue=sheet1 then
run code
While running an application in the IDE, the program properly handles Try/Catch/End Try blocks. This works fine for the most part, but is it possible to have errors generated in these blocks stop execution at the line with an error on encountering an error?
i'm Trying to make a Program that Blocks / unblocks websites.With 2 buttons.one button with : ( block website ) and one with : ( unblock website )And one listbox, where i add the sites i want to block.if the site is blocked the color is "Red" if its not blocked the color is "green"?
View 11 RepliesI need to parse a CSV file with blocks of text being processed in different ways according to certain rules, e.g.
userone,columnone,columntwo
userthirteen,columnone,columntwo
usertwenty,columnone,columntwo
customerone,columnone<br>
customertwo,columntwo<br>
[Code]...
Is there a way to pass code blocks to a method or class?
I'm trying to write a number of exception handling methods.[cod]e...
Following is the code that I'm using for reading data over a .NET socket. This piece of code is run by a single separate thread. It works OK the first time, on the second iteration it stops at "client.Receive(buffer)" and never recovers from it. Initially I was using recursion to read data but changed it to iteration thinking that recursion could be the source of problem. But apparently it is not.
[Code]...
Following is the code that i'm using for reading data over a .net socket. This piece of code is run by a single separate thread. It works OK first time, on sencond iteration it stops at "client.Receive(buffer)" and never recovers from it. Initially i was using recursion to read data but changed it to iteration thinking that recursion could be the source of problem. But apparenlty it is not.
[Code]...
Private Sub ListenContinuously()
Do 'Forever
[code].....
Using Visual Studio 2005 (vb.net) (windows forms) on Windows XP, I have a standard Microsoft TabControl.A button click adds/removes an image from 1 of the Tabs.Seems like the image is placed OVER my tab's text, making it unreadable.Why isn't it like it should be: Image on the left. Followed by text on the right.Why is the image being placed OVER my tab's text? Do I need to do some kind of "refresh" or "redraw" before it will appear as it should? I don't see any way to "make the image appear on the left edge of the tab". (NOT the tab-page.) ... and then place the text just to the right of the image. (Just like a normal image+text tab can do.)The code is pretty simple, it just gets an image from my ImageList: cfgTab.ImageKey = "PadLockClosed.png"' Show CLOSED PadLockThe tab's text changes from: This is my tab text to: T(IMAGE HERE)is my tab text The image appears OVER the beginning of my text. But if I move to another tab, then move back, the image appears in the correct position:(IMAGE HERE) This is my tab text
View 1 RepliesI work with both vb.net and c# in Visual Studio 2010, and something which annoys the hell out of me is that XML Summary blocks display differently between vb.net and c#Opened summary blocks look like this
VB
''' <summary>
''' This is the summary of what the method does
[code].....
I have a form with a "Send" button to test a code to send SMTP emails.It fires the click event when I hit the "Send" button, but the email is never sent if I leave the form running. When I close it, the email is sent.This is not the needed behavior because the User may never close the Application (this is a Client/Server application, not Web).Below is the code behind the "Send" button's click event[code]...
View 1 Replies