Check Box That The Use Checks To Indicate That A Specific Situation Is Present
Jan 26, 2012
I have a Check Box that the use checks to indicate that a specific situation is present. When the User checks the box he gets a Message Box reminding him that the condition must be fulfilled. This works fine and the database reflectthe fact that the Check Box is filled.
At a later date, if the user calls this record and fills the form, the Check Box is triggered and the message Box appears in the middle of the form fill operation.
Is there a way to prevent this from happening. I want the Check Box checked but don't want the message box if the change is triggered by the fill process.
I need to have a windows service that capable of monitoring constantly whether my application is running or not. If not, the windows service will RUN it for me.
I am making a booking system application for a sports club....In my sqlserver database I have two tables one is named as Memberships and the other is named as Bookings...Now what i want is to allow a new booking for only those customers who have a membership...In database i have joined both tables by cust_id attribute where Memberships table is parent and Bookings table is child....I want that when a new booking is tried then it should first check if the customer id is present in database or not..If it is present then the booking should be allow otherwise not...but my code either shows error first and then allows the booking Here is my code for this:
Dim i As Integer Dim str2 As String ' defines string variable for taking select query str2 = "select Memberships.cust_id, booking_date, booking_time, booking_duration, game, poolno, courtno, tableno from Bookings, Memberships where Memberships.cust_id = Bookings.cust_id"
I have a class that needs to check for errors in the data contained in a object.The routines that will check for errors could be implemented in concrete interfaces of supertype IErrorCheck. That way error checks can be discrete and added or removed from the class that requests the error checks.Each IErrorCheck implementation would be programmed against the supertype IErrorCheck (Strategy).But it would be nice not to recompile when checks are added or removed.Is there an accepted procedure for abstracting the error checks all the way out of the program, such as to read the checks from a file?
I want method which can check if microsoft office word spell checker is present. If version less than 2007 are there I check if ""C:Program FilesCommon FilesMicrosoftSharedProofMSSPELL3.DLL" this dll is present, but for officewe don't find this dllat this location. I'm looking for a method which will check for spell checker of the various version of Offices.
i have two textboxes and 1 button and label1 in my asp.net webform ...when i enter Sumit in textbox1 and 23 in textbox2 then it validates the database to check whether then value entered in textbox1 is present in Name column of database and 23 is present in Age column of database....then it redirect to ~.Default2.aspx else shows error message in label ...
My application is like this : i have to search my data from database with some check box and text box when user select check box specific function go on and then when user enters some range of value in textbox then the result will shown in data grid view after that i can print it by selecting data my vb.net code is as follow:
Is there a way to check specific pixels in a picturebox to check the color? Basically what I have is a black square with some white dots, and I want to find the position's in the picture of the white dots.
I have a number of controls (Device1, Device2, etc.) that all inherit from BaseDeviceControl. In the DragEnter event handler I am trying to test for the correct type by using the BaseDevvceControl like this....
i have this code that i am using to read from an excel spreadsheet but it i giving me an error saying that i am not not giving the exact name of the table.i have uploaded the excel spreadsheet as well. [code]
The following is a function to read a value from a field in a database, then add a value to it, and restore it.The three possible columns it reads from are Hoodoo, Give Them, Snug.It works no probs for hoodoo and snug, but not for Give them..[code]Index Out of Range Exception was unhandled. The text visualizer says that the value of night is give them.I can see the column give them in the database, so what could be going on?
I have this situation: a Form with a System.Timer in it (with AutoReset = False). The form has its main thread and the timer its own thread too (nothing new here). When the user press a button I need to stop the timer, wait until the timer thread has stopped its execution and do something more.
On the other side, the timer updates an item at the form so BeginInvoke is used. The code looks like this:
Button Code: Private Sub ButtonStop_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles ButtonStop.Click
[Code]...
The point is that I wait the main thread to let the timer thread to end its work.The problem is that this code deadlocks when the user clicks the button when the BeginInvoke is going to be called. How a simple thing like this one can be done? Looks like I cannot find a good solution to this problem
So, I have an app that uses a SQL Server express db. I have about 80ish tables all with a primary key but no foreign keys. (The reason we have no foreign keys is because of how we do our sql client-to-server replication. It's not true replication but it's a sync system that was in place when we took over the app. We have no guarantee what records are going to make it to the database first when a client syncs to the server so it is possible that a record would make it to the database with a foreign key that points to a nonexistant record). We use a type-per-model convention. For each of our business objects there is a table in the db. We currently use stored procedures for every database transaction. This means for every new class there is at least 4 new stored procedures (crud). We have abstracted out our data access layer from our business objects. Each business object has a corresponding businessObjectDAO.
My question is, is entity framework feasible for me to move to? With no foreign key relationships I'm going to have to set up every association between tables manually.My biggest hang up right now is trying to figure out how I map my DAOs to the EF partial classes. Should I be creating one big .edmx or multiple? A lot of questions I know. This is my first big architectural type decision and I've been given the go ahead to make the change if I think it is beneficial and feasible. Maybe I should try Linq-to-SQL? NHibernate is out because we're not allowed using open source products in production (stupid, I know).
It would give me 5 instead 4 results, since <title>My Channel</title> is considered one of the item under channel. I'm just wondering if there is anyway to loop through only the 4 item elements.
any method that can check for specific value of a string whether it exists in the string and if it does then that whole string will be captured with that specific text.
I'm writing an application that will be used in a mobile environment where network connectivity will be up/down regularly. How do I check to see that a specific network is available?
i need to check for a specific DateTime value in my table from my code (VB.NET) and i don't know how to format the DateTime as a string. i've read that SQL Server will recognize my string if it's in either date, time, or date and time format. i mean:
I'm wanting to add a some extra code within my application. My app is a single form that sets some environment variables before calling a one of two possible 3rd party executables to run. I have set via regedit the file association for files to open via my app but what I want to do is have my app check to see if either 3rd party app is already running. In short I'm trying to ensure either 3rd party app stays as a single instance.
If a user were to try an open another instance: 1) my application should simply terminate (no warnings, no msg boxes etc...) 2)the file that the user was trying to open should open within the existing instance of the 3rd party application. The problem is I don't quite know how to achieve both parts I imagine that this 'instance check' should happen as the first bit of code so that if no instance of either 3rd party app is found, then proceed with rest of my application. I have tested using some lines of code at the top of Sub New(). Here's what I have so far for checking for both 3rd party applications:
Public Sub New() If IsProcessRunning("ustation") = True Then Me.Close()
[code]....
This gives me an error when I debug (Cannot access a disposed object)
I tried this code but I don't know how to complete it. the code is to check if there is a file with extension ".mdb" in folder Debug in my project, and if there is a file it will get the name of it.
I want to be able to check VB code for VB-specific items (for example, vbCrLf instead of ControlChars.CrLF). Is there anything (tool, VS setting or plug-in, etc.) that will check VB code for these?
my question is how can i check a string for a specific char (for example, in the string:"242.421" theres the char "." how can i make a rule so that char can only be typed once... (in a textbox) so when a user click the "." button on their keyboard it won't allow it again (more than once)
my application i call a COM API that open's a dialog window that the user has to put some strings, what i'm trying to do it's before calling the method of the api, i create some service/background worker that checks for that dialog, and when the dialog shows up, fill all the fields...
It's possible to do somehting like this?
VB.NET
mySubThatWillWait("WindowName") 'To stay running until finding the window and fill the fields Dim result as long = MyComCall.Run(Me.Handle) 'Call the Method
.Cast(Of Double) extension method not working in a particular situation.However I can get my own extension method .CastToDouble working.Would you call this a Framework bug?see the commented out line of code in the code below.Similar code posted in my last post in this thread: http:[url].....
Option Strict On Option Explicit On Option Infer Off[code]......
