How can I convert following code to VB.NET?
class A
{
public int NumberA { get; set; }
}
[code]....
In VB.NET there is problem with Implements keyword after property declaration. So I need to do something like this:
Class B
Inherits A
Implements IC
[code]....
But there is duplicit misleading property NumberA1.
I'm facing a problem regarding multiple inheritance in VB.net:As far as I know VB.net does not support multiple inheritance in general but you can reach a kind of multiple inheritance by working with interfaces (using "Implements" instead of "Inherits"):
Public Class ClassName
Implements BaseInterface1, BaseInterface2
End Class
That works fine for classes but I'd like to have an interface inheriting some base interfaces. Something like that:
[Code]...
I've got an interface inheritance issue that has been vexing me for some time. It doesn't seem to make any sense, and I can only conclude that I'm missing something fundamental.
Overview The code below is from part of a fluent interface for our ORM tool. It provides a SQL-like syntax for pulling data from the database. You don't have to completely grok all the interrelations to understand the problem -- the real issue is the EndClause method.
The EndClause Issue There's a method called EndClause that doesn't show up in one expected spot -- IOrderQueryRoot. As far as I know, it should show up because it inherits from two different interfaces that both have a method called EndClause, but when I consume an object that implements IOrderQueryRoot, EndClause does not pop up in intellisense.
There are some more implementation details below.First though, if you look at IOrderQueryRoot (which contains EndClause), you can see that it inherits IHasOrderLogicalOperators, and also IHasOrderFields (which also contains EndClause).
Public Interface IHasOrderLogicalOperators
Function [And]() As IHasOrderFields
Function [AndNot]() As IHasOrderFields
[code]....
At this point, the interface is working fine -- if I were to remove this method, VS would scream that I have to implement both EndClause methods. The problem is one level down, when the "end developer" is trying to actually write code against the interface.
I m trying to understand Interfaces so that I can implement them in my programs but I m not able to imagine how should i use them.Also give me some eg of using them with multiple inheritance in C#
View 9 RepliesThis question is a follow-up to my last question with a reference to COM Interop. Let's say I have the following 2 interfaces and implementing classes:
[Code]...
Interfaces are important in COM interop for exposing properties and methods to IntelliSense in the VB6 IDE (per this article). However, because ICartItem is inherited from ISkuItem, SKU is not explicitly defined in ICartItem and thus is not visible in IntelliSense in VB6 and even throws a compiler error when trying to write to objCartItem.SKU.
I've tried using Shadows and Overloads on the SKU property in ISkuItem, but then the compiler wants me to explicitly implement SKU for both ISkuItem and ICartItem within the CartItem class. I don't think that's what I want. Is there a way (in either VB.NET or C#) to explicitly declare the SKU property in ICartItem without having to declare SKU twice in the CartItem class?
I'm struggling to convert the below code to C#.
Class Class1
Implements IMyInterface
Public Event MyEvent(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As MyEventArgs) Implements IMyInterface.MyEvent
[Code]....
I'm sure I can find out what to replace the NotImplementedException parts with but VS is still telling me that the definition is not implemented anyway.
This may seem like an obvious answer, but I can't seem to find an answer. I have this code in VB.NET[code]...
The problem with this is that in C#, it would seem you have to name the function the same as the interface function you are implementing. How can I call this method EncryptionVB instead of Encryption, but still implement the Encryption property?
I've got an Interface that dictates classes that implement it to use a large amount of properties and a few methods. I've been using this interface for some time and I have a large amount of classes that implement it.
Now, I need the interface to become a MustInherit (abstract) class, because I need to implement a single method that must be the same for every class implementing the interface (I mean the implementation must be the same, hence I cannot use an interface anymore).
Is there a way to do this automatically, perhaps even using third party tools such as resharper (which is C# only I think?) or similar? I get a headache even thinking about the work I need to do to make this change manually[code]....
can i convert colors values to integer?
View 6 Replieshow to create a user interface in a game such as the application XFire using Visual Basic?
View 3 RepliesI'm working on a design project where I have to use a Graphical User Interface that contains a drag and drop form. It consists of having a window dropped on a wall. Both of them are images to scale. I would like to know what kind of code I would have to use to show the x and y coordinates of one of the points of my window when dragged so when I drop it, I'm dropping in it on the desired coordinate of the wall.
View 2 RepliesI was wondering if I could elicit some tips on how to procede with an interface design approach.That is. What is a good way to go about establishing a "work area" where one can have multiple "floating forms" in this area.Can you have a form which occupies the entire windows desk top and the other forms "float" in this space? the "floating" forms would need to interact with each other where pressing buttons etc on them would affect other forms on the "workspace") Or what would be a good way to start accomplishing that? Or is there a better way to get the same effect?
View 4 RepliesI'm trying to make a .dll that contains a lot of basic functionality that a program can use. Currently i am trying to use interfaces to make a lot of this functionallity independend of the program using it but i hit a snag. The Basic idea is that a programmer will create his own object using the interface discribed in my .DLL file. Then implements those functions as he likes. He can then instanciate a controller (found in the same DLL) and sends his custom object implementing the interface to that Controller. The controller can then be started and will take over all the work. I do not know what type of object is send to the controller and idealy i want to program it in such a fashion that i shouldn't care as long as the object send implements that interface.In code I am trying to achieve the following: (quite simplyfied)
.Dll:
Code:
Public Interface MyInterface '<----Decleration of the interfaceFunction GetData() As Integer
Function SetData(Data As Integer)
end interface
[code]....
this propperly. I know that the second i set the interface adaptor in the Controller VS comes nagging that it can not be converted to a "MyInterface" Class. Obviously i am doing something wrong. I can change the datatype that the controller expects to the "MyController" type but that would completely ruin the whole idea of flexibillity. I am hoping someone sees what i am trying to do and can point out where i made the thinking error.
Is this where i would post a picture of my interface and get feedback on changes for easier use? If not is there someplace on this forum or any other forum to do this?
View 1 Repliesi am just trying to apply inheritance ..Below is my Code ... on which i am not getting the output on my Text_Box ... when in write it in a Child Class
Imports System
Imports System.Windows
Imports System.Windows.Forms
[code]....
Has someone a hint what I'm doing wrong in VB.Net?
Module Module1
Interface ISearch(Of T As ISearchResult)
Function ids() As List(Of T)
End Interface
[CODE]...
The third cast isn't working. Why? did I miss a oop lesson?
What's the choice design that microsoft do that? Of course, as of me, I don't use inheritance a lot, or at all.
View 14 Repliesin the codebase i'm maintaining there is an old interface. Let's call it IFoo. It pretty much became obsolete and replaced with the Interface INewFoo with a change a few weeks ago, but for backwards-compatibility purposes, i wrote a wrapper class which implements INewFoo and takes an IFoo in the constructor.To clarify, consider the following code.
Public Interface IFoo
Sub DoStuff()
End Interface[code].....
For both interfaces, the implementations are loaded by scanning a few assemblies with StructureMap. Now, let's get to the bad things. Most implementations for the old interface were put into forms for reason i can neither understand nor change. Because those tend to be displayed and disposed, i have to create a new instance every time i use ObjectFactory.GetAllInstances(Of IFoo). Thats still no problem, but i'd like to register a INewFoo-Wrapper for each registered implementation of IFoo, so that i can just use ObjectFactory.GetAllInstances(of INewFoo) and get all implementations of IFoo AND INewFoo.I can't iterate through the implementations of IFoo and register a wrapper for each one because as far as i can see, you can just register those with instances.Wrong code below:
ObjectFactory.Configure(Sub(config)
config.Scan(Sub(scan)
For Each ass In assemblies[code].....
My question is: Is it possible to register a wrapper for each implementation of IFoo which always creates a new instance of the implementation before creating a new instance of the wrapper?
I want to declare a property as an interface collection of an interface, and I want to instanciate the explicit type later, in the constructor. Something like this.
Public Class LicenseFile
Implements ILicenseFile
Public Property Collection As IList(Of ILicenseFileDataNode)
[Code]....
In short, the question is "Why It Didn't work"? This is a simplified scenario, but It's easy to take a workarround, But I need understand the reason because It's fails.
I'm using interface with relay and interface is connected to computer on COM (serial) 9 pins port. In Visual Studio 2005 I'm using this
SerialPort1.Open
SerialPort1.DtrEnable = True
SerialPort1.Breakstate = True
[code].....
we have 3 classes:Class S, class A, class B / A and B inherits S.A has a property A1 and B has a property B1.we also have a collection of objects that has A and B objects.ex.
Dim c as Collection = new Collection
c.add(new A)
c.add(new B)
Now we want to make a general object that will read from the collection.
ex .
Dim obj as S
how can we cast obj in order to see properties A1 or B1 according to the class;
Form1
Public Class Form1
Private Sub But_Bell_Click(sender As System.Object, e As System.EventArgs) Handles But_Bell.Click
MessageBox.Show("Ding a ling")
End Sub
[code]....
Where has the whistle button gone? The class part of the inheritance has works because you can access it via code.
Why VB.NET (vs C#) does not "inherit" the constructors with parameters?
Public Class StopLine
Inherits Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.LineShape
Public Sub New()
MyBase.New()
[code]....
What are the situations and their associated benefits of using Generics over Inheritance and vice-versa, and how should they be best combined?I'm going to try to state the motivation for this question as best I can:I have a class as shown below:
[Code]...
Now suppose I have a repository that takes an InformationReturn argument, that has to strore different fields in a DB depending on the type of Info object T is. Is it better to create different repositories each for the type T is; one repository that uses reflection to determine the type; or is there a better way using inheritance capabilities over/with generics?
I have a base class ("MyBaseClass") in a project called "BaseFramework" which is included in several solutions within the company. There are several derived class's in various projects throughout the company that inherit from "MyBaseClass". If I then create a List and add derived class's to it, it will not serialize. I realise that if I were attempting to serialize this list, and the base class and derived class were in the same project, I could simply apply the "XmlInclude" attribute to the base class and include all of the derived class's. This is however not possible across projects, because that would require a circular dependency.
View 1 RepliesI searched quickly and not find an explicit answer at the following question:Why VB.NET (vs C#) does not "inherit" the constructors with parameters?
Public Class StopLine
Inherits Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.LineShape
Public Sub New()
[code].....
I have the following code; now i set a propertygrid.selectedobject to the Square object, and start changing the Squares properties. If i change the [Position.x] or [position.y] values in the propertygrid the [Position] and [center] properties update correctly, however when i change the [Center] property, neither [Position] or [Position.x] or [Position.y] update. Is there something else i must do to get this to work both ways. Maybe something is lacking in PointFConverter?
Imports System
Imports System.Collections
Imports System.Drawing
[code]....
Suppose I want to inherit from System.Data.SqlClient.SqlTransaction which is sealed. Supose I want to just put a wrapper around SqlTransaction and always use MyTransaction instead of SqlTransaction. Is there a way I could potentially cast MyTransaction to SqlTransaction using an Implicit/Widening operator?
View 8 RepliesI have a parent class and many children class, right now it look like this:
Public Class Parent
Public Property ID as String
End Class
[Code].....
What I need is a strongly type list List(Of Child) that Inherits from ListOfParent (I need the FindByID method) but I can't find the right syntax.
get around lack of multiple inheritance
View 2 Replies