IDE :: Ignore EditorBrowsable(EditorBrowsableState.Never)?
Oct 4, 2009
Okay, let's say for example that I disagree with some of Microsoft's decisions to hide things from intellisense , and want to override this. Is it possible to have my intellisense ignore the EditorBrowsable(EditorBrowsableState.Never) attribute?
I have an xml document. The description tag is enclosed in a cdata section. When I view the page in firefox I get the following error: XML Parsing Error: not well-formed It's erroring at this character (an empty white square and I don't know what the character really is). Is there a way I can get the parser to ignore these characters?
So I want to now if that possible for .NET languages to ignore error without using try catch construction ?
I can ignore warring with #nowarring 40 for example, can I ignore error ?
simply wanted to call system pause with this way
open System.Runtime.InteropServices [<DllImport(@"msvcrt.dll")>] extern void system(string str) system "pause"
but got Error message
unbalanced stack. This is probably because the managed PInvoke signature does not match the unmanaged target signature. Make sure that the calling convention and parameters of the PInvoke signature match the target unmanaged signature.
So I don't care, it works. But can I just ignore this error ? without doing weird stuff like that :
try (system "pause") catch |_->()
Ok , I solved my problem by adding CallingConvention=CallingConvention.Cdecl, but what the question was about skipping exceptions, so and I still don't know if I can do it.
So maybe I need to tell some real reason to not be down-voted hard - sometimes it's matters for program to live even with hard errors occupations, but even sometimes you don't need to catch them. You need just ignore them...
I use TortoiseSVN for versioning of my large VB Project in Visual Studio 2008. Once in a while, when editing one of the many typed DataSets, VS feels like switching the position of the attributes msprop:Generator_ColumnVarNameInTableand msprop:Generator_ColumnPropNameInRow In like nine THOUSAND places of the .xsd file. Sometimes I use a custom sed-script to reverse it again but most of the time I just commit it without knowing if there was any real change.
Can I prevent Visual Studio from messing with those attributes? Can I enforce a specific ordering? Or do I need some workflow within TSVN to ignore or revert such changes?
I wrote a small VB.Net Console app that scans thru the lines, sorting the attributes. It works on text alone as one cannot use xml parsing abilities without a massive increase in execution time and code size.
Does anybody know how to ignore a line(s) of code after a line(s) has executed. Let say you have a button1, and two CheckBoxes. By clicking once button1, cheheckbox1 checked. By clicking agin button1, then CheckBox2 checked. You will probably say that I can do that in diferent way, but it isn't the solution of this problem that I want. This is only an example.
I have set up my form using with the languages and I have store the texts in the resource. I have debug the project and everything seen to be fine. I found that there is a folder in the project bin folder. The folder was called zh-chs. I have changed the name from roject1.resources.dll to testdll.dll and moved to the bin folder. I have added reference in my project and I have deleted the zh-chs folder. Suddenly, I have found a warning sage.
Code:Could not resolve this reference. Could not locate the assembly "TESTDLL, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=zh-CHS, processorArchitecture=MSIL". Check to make sure the assembly exists on disk. If this reference is required by your code, you may get
When I run my program if finds fields fill's them in and submits, but sometimes the page does not have them fields and I just want it to skip them if not found so it continues otherwise it crashes.
My e.g field: WebBrowser1.Document.GetElementById("subject").SetAttribute("value", TextBox3.Text)
ll app build in VB 2005 that has a DLL. The app runs fine on 32bit systems but fails on 64-bit ones (Failed to load the assembly: BadImageFormat from the DLL). As I could not fix the problem I wish to somehow ignore this error so the rest of the app can run normally. I wish to retain the funcionality on 32-bit systems thus not removing the DLL from the project.
I am using the following function to parse url's from a text file, however it also collects emails.How do I change it so it ignores email address's?[code]...
I have data that I have to send as xml. There are many characters that are receiving an error. Is there a quick way that I can ignore all these characters?
I'm using VB .NET 2005 Express (all the latest...5 years ago). Is there some easy way to bring up a MsgBox which has only "Ignore" and "OK" buttons, or would I have to create my own form?
what i need is if the ALT key is pressed to ignore it. Like for example if you hit Ctrl+Alt+Del it opens the taskmgr. So all i need is for when the form is open if you hit Ctrl+Alt+Del the Alt key wont work so then nothing happens. Well either the Alt or Ctrl key
I need to read this data into a string array. In my new file I need to write Name,Sal and Location columns only. Here is my code:
Dim ioReader As New System.IO.Streamreader("C:old.csv") ioLines="Name,Sal,Location" Dim ioWriter As New System.IO.StreamWriter("C:
[Code]....
When I am splitting the above data, the sal column values which already contains "," is splitting into 2 cells. I want to keep the sal column value as a single cell by ignoring "," in between numbers.
On the server side of my application I have a function like this:
public function GetDS as MyTypedDS Dim dsRetVal as new MyTypedDS 'Make fantastic things with the dataset return dsRetVal end function
On the client side I call this function through a generated "service reference":
Dim ds as Reference1.MyTypedDS = myRefInst.GetDS
How can I disable schema serializaion of the typed dataset to reduce the traffic?Is it enough to set the SchemaSerializationMode of 'dsRetVal' to ExcludeSchema before returning it? Or is this option ignored by WCF?
learning VB2008 in this forum i just create a simple application that i dream to make i happen. Msdn i learn a lot here and my application are fine but i have one isssue with that code
Is there a way to force my application to ignore the index out of bounds error from the DataGridView? I have gone through from top to bottom and there is no reason why I should be receiving this error. No operations, rows, nor columns are affected by just continuing past the er
I have an xls file that needs to be imported into SQL Server directly from .net. I figured out how to do this, but now my problem is the data. The following data is in the xls file: Name, Address, City, State, Zip, Phone. The phone number can come in in various values (with dashes and without). I have no way of controlling this data because it is an export out of some third party application. My problem is that the numbers with the dashes are being ignored by the Excel import. I am using the OPENROWSET to import.
I'm trying to make it so that if a user checks the listview item checkbox, it does something, but not when the code checks it. This seems really basic.
I try to filter a datagridview and I wrote an sql statement for that reason. The problem is that although I achieved to have multifilter I can find how to make my cod ignore the criteria which are null (empty criteria, when the user doesn t give any values). I tried the code below but I know that it isn t correct.
I wonder how i could do so a form gets unclickable. I am doing a crosshair and when i test it out and put it on its place then when i trying to shoot the program inactivates.how i can make a forms startposition custom?
In my form I have a variable that is of the type Windows.Forms.Form. When my program is enabled/disabled I create a new form instance in there and close it (respectively). Since I don't want the form sitting in memory the whole time my program is open the references to properties of the form are invalid (because the initial declaration is not the form but the type). How can I either negate this or ignore this error?
in my VB.NET application, my main Form can show other Forms. That works fine, but I need to set "focus" on the newly opened form, and don't allow the user use the main form until the opened Form is closed. How do I do that?
I have a form that contains a picturebox and in form_load event it gets a picture from a website with already known link..[code]and it works okay when the user is connected to the internet but it shows an error and it will stuck there if it's not connected..What should i do in this case..Should I ignore if there is no connection or is there anything else I could do ??Or what could I add to my code ??
No matter what I try, it never matches the sign. I even tried using the string as the pattern. This function should be able to take a string like 1 day -36mins + 2s -1s and parse it into a TimeSpan object. Any pointers?
How do I get Linq to ignore any parameters that are empty? So Lastname, Firstname, etc? If I have data in all parameters it works fine...
refinedresult = From x In theresult _ Where x.<thelastname>.Value.TestPhoneElement(LastName) And _ x.<thefirstname>.Value.TestPhoneElement(FirstName) And _ x.<id>.Value.TestPhoneElement(Id) And _
We need to store a list of data we pull from another table that relates to one of our models. (We are too deep into build to add this relationship to our DB where it should be.) When we attempt to load this list in a property of the model that needs it.We load this list into a dropdown in a view. The error occurs trying to load this list into the model in the controller. The true caveat is that we have a unique dropdown list for each record in our table in the view.
Our Class: Public class OurModel public property ID As Integer[code]....
Error: LINQ to Entities does not recognize the method 'DB.ModelTable get_Item(Int32)' method, and this method cannot be translated into a store expression.
UPDATE: The issue appears to be that LINQ is trying to do something with a the DBContext of a query I do previously in this controller. The error is referencing DB.Employee not DB.Position which is what I am querying.