Public WithEvents Tree as Tree. I am not able to Serialize the Tree class, but if i remove the "WithEvents" keyword, it works fine. Why? What should I do if I have to declare it with "WithEvents"?
View 2 RepliesI am converting an application from vb.net 2003 to 2005. I got the following warning and need help how to resolve it. withEvents variable 'PreviousPage' conflicts with property 'PreviousPage' in the base class 'Page' and should be declared 'Shadows'
View 1 RepliesWhat does this error mean? I havent modified anything in the designer code, but its giving me an error? WithEvents variable 'Move' conflicts with event 'Move' in the base class 'Control' and should be declared 'Shadows'. The error relates to Friend WithEvents Move As System.Windows.Forms.DataGridViewCheckBoxColumn
View 1 RepliesCan you raise events from a class that has only shared members and doesn't get instantiated? I originally had the class members non-shared and created instances of the class where I need them. I had the events being raised and everything worked as expected. But as the class members are actually application level and do not need instancing, I converted all members in the class to shared so they could be accessed from anywhere in the program without creating an instance of the class. But WithEvents requires the creation of a class instance. I've done that and it seems to work fine when using an instance. And since I need the events handled in only one class, I can create the instance in that class and let all other areas access the class directly, without creating an instance.
View 10 RepliesIn short, I can't seem to get the xml serializer to serialize an array of one class type embedded within an array of another class.I have two classes, one of which contains an array of the other class, as follows (there are other objects in the classes that I've not included):
[Code]...
There must be a simple way to get the XML serializer to serialize the array of the class embedded within the array of the class that I am serializing. Am I missing something?
I want to know the disadvantage of serialization of a class in vb.net. As I am using it for deep copy only. Is it correct or not?
View 3 RepliesI'm trying to make this work here is the code it's quite simple the serialization work's though the deserialization dosen't.[code]...
View 2 RepliesI have an error in the the following class, but am unsure where it is. The class will return correctly in my service but does not serialize and return any results.
Imports System
Imports System.Data.Objects
Imports System.Data.Objects.DataClasses
Imports System.Data.EntityClient
Imports System.ComponentModel
Imports System.Xml.Serialization
Imports System.Runtime.Serialization
[Code] .....
This will not be the final iteration of GetEmail, but I am using this in it's current state to try and figure out why I am not getting the class to serialize correctly.
I am making a TabStrip control to hold a number of tabs just like TabControl, but only with the tabs, no page. The control has a "Tabs Collection", which stores a list of "Tab" class. "Tab" is not inherited from Control, but each tab has its events. So when the user add a "Tab" in the "Tabs Collection", each "Tab" instance should have a (Name) identifier, which user can access it in the code, and with WithEvents keyword so users can add event handlers to each "Tab". The expected out come should similar to this:
Friend TabStrip1 As TabStrip
Friend WithEvents t1 As Tab
...
Me.TabStrip1.Tabs.Add(t1)
[Code]....
I am having trouble saving a class to a file via Serialization. I am getting this error:
Type 'System.Drawing.Graphics' in Assembly 'System.Drawing, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' is not marked as serializable.
I have changed the:
Public Class cJigsaw
to:
<Serializable()> Public Class cJigsaw
The next line in my class is:
Public img As Bitmap
I tried adding the <Serializable()> attribute to this code, yet it has this error:
Attribute 'SerializableAttribute' cannot be applied to 'img' because the attribute is not valid on this declaration type.
I need to avoid serializing an Event class member because when the event is handled by an object that is not marked as Serializable the serialization will fail.
I tried using the NonSerialized attribute on the Event class member but it fails to compile. This line of code:<NonSerialized()> Public Event PropertyValueChanged()
produces the following error: Attribute 'NonSerializedAttribute' cannot be applied to
'PropertyValueChanged' because the
attribute is not valid on this
declaration type.
Public Event PropertyValueChanged() ' compiles but needs the extra handling described below
Is there another way to avoid serializing Event members? This is not a problem if the event is not handled and I can work around it by cloning the objects (and ignoring the event) before serializing them. Just wondering if there is a better way.
I wasn't ment to post anywhere, but I'm having a massive headacke.I've searched the Internet, tried many different way, but nothing to do.. I can't fix this, I don't even know why this is happening ..See the end of this message for details on invoking just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.
************** Exception Text **************
System.InvalidOperationException: An error occurred creating the form. See Exception.InnerException for details. The error is: Class not registered (Exception from
[code]......
I'm trying to create a generic Controller Class for generic events. But these these events still need to access their class variable. So my idea is to create the Base Controller Class with a ModelBaseclass variable as _ClassVar, which is inherited by all of the other class Controller classes will derive from. But I want the derived controller classes to override the _ClassVar with whichever one they need.
I want to do this, so the ControllerBaseClass can have all the generic functions that all the Derived Classes would use.
Model :
Public Class ModelBaseClass
Public Overridable Function Foo() As String
Return "Name"
[Code].....
I have a text file to read, at the first line will have a size of array, that means I cannot guess size of array, and I have to create a array in side a sub (Local Variable). Then, I want to use value of array in another sub, but I cannot use value of variable of another sub. What I have to do to make an array con be used in every sub/function in a class? Also, I've post an example file, code and error list.
[Code]...
I want to see if there is a way to do this... I'm Using vs2010 with the WP7 SDK. (VB.NET)
I am declaring this in the global scope.
public objGame as object then say i have classes: Game1 and Game2 for the sake of the example we'll just say both classes have an Update() function
I want to set objGame = Game1 (or Game2) and then be able to call objGame.Update()
I've been using XML serialization for a while, and today I realized something really odd. If I have a new line right after a "dot" (.), when i deserialize, I lose the dot. Has anyone ever had this happen to them? The following is my serialization code:
[Code]...
I want to be able have the class autofire a function when it is first declared. In my example it would be to load from a file all the constant variables for use in the program.
View 4 RepliesI am try to learn to use Mysql / MySql.Data.MySqlClientI did find sample how to connect to Mysql but I want to have it in Class or Module so I only call open database when I open the form
How can I fix this Name 'connStr' is not declared
CODE:
how variables declared with protected access in a base class are used to implement inheritance.
View 1 RepliesBackground:I have a base class and several inherited derived classes. The derived classes don't always need to have the same properties. If any properties are shared among the derived classes, those properties would live at the base class level ('Contents', for example).Similarly, GoodDocument below has 'GoodThings' but would not want/need to have 'BadThings'.I want to treat instances of both 'GoodDocument' and 'BadDocument' as type 'Document'
public mustinherit class Document
public property Contents as string
public sub new()...
[code]....
In re-engineering a windows forms application, I find that a lot of code-behind in the various form classes is duplicative and I'm trying to centralize as many procedures as possible into a base class which can be inherited and used by the subclassed forms.
This process seems to be going well and is making the code in my subclasses much simpler and hopefully easier to maintain, but I'm not sure where to draw the line between leaving code in the subclasses and engineering for generic resusability and moving it to the base class.
Specifically, in some subclasses I have code which manipulates variables and objects specific to the subclass, and although I could move the code-behind into the base class, the base class code references specific objects which are needed to compile. For example, each subclass manipulates a databound datagridview and form detail controls which allows the user to select between multi-record and detailed single-record views of a datatable.
In Visual Basic 2008 do I need to declare dummy data objects in the base class so that the base class will compile? Or is there a way to indicate that the data objects will be provided by the subclass?
I have two experimental web services. One is an asmx contained within a .net web application. The other is a WCF service library being invoked from the web application.The asmx basically does everything I need, but I think WCF would be better, except that it doesn't do anything as I would expect after fiddling with the asmx service.For example, the same method behaves differently in each:
' ASMX
<WebMethod(BufferResponse:=True, EnableSession:=False)>
Function Test(aObject as Object) as Object
' object will have been successfully serializaed into a dictionary
[code]...
i have 2 mustinherit classes where one is a generic one:
'Visual Basic 2008 - .net 3.5 - Any CPU
Public MustInherit Class BaseObject
End Class
Public MustInherit Class BaseObjectList(Of T As {New, BaseObject})
Inherits List(Of T)
End Class[code]...........
i receive: "Type argument BaseObject is declared 'MustInherit' and does not satisfy the 'New' constraint for the type parameter"users would never enter data in the wrong form,files they choose to open would always exist and code would never have bugs.
I placed this checkbox named owner on my form. When i build the project i got the error as
Quote: 'owner' conflicts with property 'owner' in the base class 'Form' and should be declared 'Shadows'
[Code]...
Yesterday I started my first DLL project which is for ArabicMessageBox that will allow arabic programmers to display there message in totally Arabic message.My project contain one Form only, and the basic code that I use is:
Public Overridable Function Show(ByVal APrompt As String) As MsgBoxResult
mLoad(APrompt, MsgBoxStyle.OkOnly, "")
Me.ShowDialog()
[code]....
The following is a screenshot of the problem: What can I do?
View 3 RepliesWho knows, why in vb.net WinForm projects the designer by default use the Friend WithEvents attributes and in C# - private ones.
By ex, in a form.designer.
.cs
private Label Label1;
.vb
Friend WithEvents Label1 as Label;
For WithEvents is more or less clear(for using Handles, apparently). But why Friend in VB and private in C#...
i have the folowing co
For x = 0 To 7 Step 1
For i = 0 To 7 Step 1
Dim rectangleShape1 As New Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.RectangleShape() 'create a new object to assign to the array location
board(x, i) = New Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.RectangleShape() 'create the new object in the array
[code].....
When you declare an object 'WithEvents' and then utilize the "Handles" clause at the end of your event methods, how does Visual Basic manage a reference change for the object? In other words, if the withevents var is set to ObjectA, then later I switch it to ObjectB (or nothing), does Visual Basic automatically both remove those handler methods from ObjectA, and attach them to ObjectB? Or do I still have a ObjectA's events being handled behind the scenes?
I ask this because if instead you use AddHandler for an object, and then switch your reference, unless you removed the handler before switching, your original object is still handled (at least I'm pretty sure that's how it works).
I have the following classes: Public Class Email
[Code]...
If a create a wrong email lets say "email" the exception is correctly cached and a message is showed however is i input a valid email the event is not raised, the object is being created but no message is shown and no error or exception is thrown i suspect it has something to do with using "myemail = new Email(email)" but i have seen examples of using new with withevents with no problem.