I'm using a DataGridView to load data from a DataTable. This DataGridView is located on a tab (Forms.TabPage). When clicking this tab the datagrid takes a second or two to draw from the top down, regardless of wheather data is being loaded or not. Is there anything I can do to speed up the DrawingRendering when clicking the Tab?I Don't think the actual population of the DGV is causing this, as it's filled during form load so by the time the tabs click it would have loaded the few rows (20 - 30) it displays.
Using cn As New SqlConnection(connectionString)
Using cmd As SqlCommand = cn.CreateCommand()
cmd.CommandType = System.Data.CommandType.Text[code]....
I've got a pretty big datagridview that I have to populate, and it's already (with not loads of data) taking quite a long time to populate. I can't imagine it's possible in my situation to bind the datagridview to the data I want to populate, but here is the situation.
I want the column headers along the top to be a bunch of users, which I have in one data table. I want the row headers along the side to be skill names, whihc I have in another data table, and the data in the middle is the score of each user for each skill in data table 3. Some users don't have a score, some do.
The way I have achieved this at present is to create the columns first using data table 1, then for each skill (data table 2), create an array of rows from data table 3 that match the skill, find the matching user (ColumnIndex) for each of these rows, and fill in the score.
I am loading data from query into a dataadapter and then into a dataset.the datadridview datasource is the set to the dataset.but it takes too long to load the data into the datagridview.
A DataGridView in my VB.NET 2008 program contains over 15,000 rows. I loop through the rows, totalling groups of rows and appending 'total rows' and one 'Final total row' to the DataGridView. That works fine. I want to initially hide all rows except for the total rows, giving the user the option to show all 'detail' rows. If i place the statement << dgvTitleCounts.Rows(intRow).Visible = False >> in the loop, execution time increases by three minutes and that is unacceptable.
I see two options: (1) find a faster way of making all rows invisible; and (2) place the total rows in a separate DataSet and bound DataGridView.
The following snip of simple code runs pretty slow on my computer, and I suspect that it is due to excessive memory usage, since the program reports using >1GB mem according to TaskManager. Am I using the DataGridView in a wrong way? Instructions: Make a windowsforms application and put 2x button and 1xDataGridView on it. Push button1 and then button2 - sort the data in the DataGridView by a different col and push button2 again. It'll go above 1GB mem usage! Basically I need to display a lot of data to a user and allow the user to sort the data and generate something from them.
Public Class Form1 Public dt As DataTable Private Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click dt = New DataTable
i have a datagridview which have 3 columns, two button columns increase or decrease, 3rd displays the value increased or decreased from button. i have datagridview_CellContentClik behind button columns. The problem is increase in value on pressing button is very slow. i mean if i press button quickly the value should increase quickly but its the same slow pace for increasing or decreasing value on pressing button.
Something happened to my VS2005 setup and now the first time load for F1 can take a full minute to load. I think the last significant thing I did was install an add-in for ESRI ArcExplorer. I uninstalled that add-in but help is stil VERY slow to start.Does anyone recognize the problem and have a simple fix?
Is there any way that i can be able to get the ExecutenonQuery to Execute faster. Am using it to run mysql queries that have joins from diffrent tables. As I have come to notice, the user has to wait a while before the statement ExecutenonQuery can be completely executed.. is there any way that I can get it to execute faster?
Im using VB2010 professional edition and Ms Access 2007 DB. Main form contains a button which accesses database, fetch results in textboxes and update database. But sometimes it takes almost 40seconds to fetch and sometimes it fetches immediately. Couldn't understand any pattern for this. The table in the database contains 8000records and Main form has 3000 lines of code.
We have old VB6 code, and now that Windows 8 is coming along, we are worried that it won't work. So we have to decide what to port it to. VB.net would seem to make sense, but since it compiles to an intermediate level, its not as fast as programs that compile straight to assembly language. Another choice we found was "Power Basic" which is supposed to be much faster that VB.net.
I happen to like various features of VB.net such as the GUI editor, and intellisense and so forth, and so I'm wondering - is there some way to get around the MSIL (intermediate level) factor in slowing the language down?
its' only me, or is VS2010 really so slooow? This taking 50 seconds to open vs2010, 30 seconds to change from an small project to other small project.as a comparation, in the same machine I can open three different vb6 projects, each one in one different vb6 instance and each one takes "only" three to five seconds. of course I can maintain all the three instances opened all the day, sutching from one to other, debugging, changing, even generatin' exe files, without noticeable penalties.machine is Dell Vostro 1700 4 GB, two internal disks, Win Vista business, Intel Core 2 Duo T 7500 2,2 GHz. two years old.
am using system.net.mail to send email as shown below, but its too slow. it takes about a minute to send, whats wrong with my code. Am calling the code below in backgroundworker_dowork. is there a faster alternative, maybe free or open source code
' send the email ' Dim smtp As SmtpClient = New SmtpClient() Dim mail As New MailMessage()[code]............
All of a sudden all vb programs running very slow in XP...... nothing has changed.I took the vb2008 complete out, and reinstalled...... and no difference. other programs like excel run as before, just all my vb2008 programs are really slow.....
Basically i have designed an app that runs smoothly on my desktop PC (3GHz processor, 2GB RAM, Windows XP Media Centre (SP3)).
When i put the app on my laptop(1.4GHz processor, 448MB RAM, Windows XP Home Edition (SP2)) it runs really slow and is unusable.
I have tried deploying the app and also just copy the whole folder to my laptop and run the apps *.exe from the bin/debug folder, but it has the same results.
I have tested it on higher spec machines with 2GB RAM and they also replicate the slowness, so i'm at a loss as to why it behaves 100% on my desktop PC, where i have Visual Studio installed but not on any other machine.
My question is if little differences like operating system, RAM, service packs, VS installation, etc, make apps run differently on different machines.
I have designed an application just like it is an Excel table. By changing each textbox the application runs a huge amount of vb code and it takes time.
E.g. you want to enter a three digits number it takes from two to four and sometimes more seconds for ech digit to enter. That`s really embarrassing.
I've got a vb.net 2005 form that calls a stored proc to load a combobox with eligible sales reps. There are approximately 40k sales reps available...I know that's a lot, but that's what I'm dealing with. I'm trying to figure out why it's taking this form 15 seconds to load.
Here's my code:
Want to load this in the most efficient way possible given the HUGE amount of data that my client is wanting to see.
i know this question was asked a couple of years ago by TheMinistered .. but i cannot find an answer, and i have exaclty the same problem (using both VB6 and VB.net 2003) :
When I attempt to connect to a remote SQL server via ADO it takes almost 20-30 seconds before Open returns. I don't know if it's something I'm doing wrong... here is my connection string/code:
Private Sub Class_Initialize() Dim strConnectionString As String Set m_objConnection = New Connection
I'm writing a application that need to execute a certain code several times a second. At first, i wrote a Function and used it. But it was too slow... So, using Stopwatch i started measuring the performance of my code. And apparently it was from the funcion call. So i wrote a example code, just a simple loop. And using the Stopwatch it took 4E-6 = 0.000004 seconds. Then i copy and paste the loop code, into a function and made a call to the function. it took 0.03 seconds. It was 7500 times slower with a function call. Why using a function call can be so much slower?[code]...
I'm using Visual Studio 2010 Pro on a Windows 7 PC, to build simple VB Windows Form Applications (I've just started learning VB). Lately when I try to debug my applications, it takes unusually long. For example, an application with just a blank form and nothing else will take about a minute to build, and then it will sit for another minute or two until the app window pops up. It didn't use to do this!
