Calling Functions With An IF Statement But Then Not Using The Returned Value For Anything
Sep 16, 2010
im calling functions with an IF statement but then not using the returned value for anything... is there a reason that i shouldn't do this? in my form i call the function to run...
I am returning to VB and coding after several years of trying to be out of coding :) I would like in grabbing data retrieved from a SQL database call into an array of sorts so that I can quickly close the database connection. I am having some trouble remembering how to do this. Most of the posts I've found say to use the dataSet() functionality, but I do not have a table name for the structure to mimic. I am selecting from several tables on a remote server.
Are there any functions that can be called across the project.I mean we cn use Private Sub ABC() function in the document where it has been declared but is there any way that this could be called from any other form?
Are there any functions that can be called across the project.I mean we cn use Private Sub ABC() function in the document where it has been declared but is there any way that this could be called from any other form?
I am using Visual Studio 2008 to try and create a calculator program that can convert binary to decimal. I have some code but I'm having problems figuring out what to write as an "argument" when I was to call the function.
Here is the code I have so far.
Public Class Form1 Private Sub btnCalculate_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles btnCalculate.Click
In my .NET application I have to get results from a MS Access database. I would like to add error checking to make sure a row was returned from my SELECT statement.
I need to build an application that could run code in private function, based on what user has selected using combobox. For example combo box has three values, One, Two, Three. If user selects one, code written under Private Function One() runs and vise versa.
I need to build an application that could run code in private function, based on what user has selected using combobox.For example combo box has three values, One, Two, Three If user selects one, code written under Private Function One() runs and vise versa?
I get this error: Cannot refer to an instance member of a class from within a shared method or shared member initializer without an explicit instance of the class.
Partial Class _Default Inherits System.Web.UI.Page <WebMethod()> _
[Code]....
I know it has something to do with the fact that the first function is shared and the second function should probably be Public as well but I don't fully understand the reason behind it. Probably not relevant but I'm calling the web method from some javascript.
I have a dll whitch init a thread in dllmain.After than, the calling application call some dll functions which register the remote function of the application.function register done, when the thread works and receives and even, it call the program functions (those I stored register before)int C would be like:
int (__stdcall *f_wmif) (char *) = NULL; INT __declspec(dllexport) __stdcall _DGTDLL_RegisterWMIFunc (int (__stdcall *whitemoveinputfunc) (char *)) { f_wmif=whitemoveinputfunc;
The project requires a form that has textboxes for a students name and the amount of books they have read, and a label where the points they have earned for their reading is displayed. Also a seperate form with About information and yet another seperate form for summary information.
in VB.NET it is possible to omit parentheses when you call a parameterless function. However this can be very confusing because developers could think that a statement is accessing a property instead of a method. this could result in a performance drop if you are calling the method again and again instead of storing the result in a temp variable.is there an option in VS2008 or a compiler option to force parentheses on statements that are calling a method? and if so, would it be also possible that VS will insert missing parentheses automatically if you "format document".
I have a midterm project where we must replicate what our teacher has made, it is a convenience store program. I am having trouble calling the functions, he wants us to use these:
PopulateItems => Populate Items listbox based on the category selected GetItemPrice => Retrieve the price for a given item GetItemPriceFromPurchases => Retrieve the item price from the purchases list box (optional. You may not need
[CODE]...
So far I have the first list box populated when the form loads. However outside of that I do not know where to call the function in order to populate the second list box upon selection of the first.
If I have two threads both calling a normal function at the same that appends strings, sometime the output string is a combination from both threads as the function had not finished executing the code before it was called again... Would a shared function wait to finish first?
I have a class called PunchEvent. In the class I have an Enum called EventReason. I want to have a function Public Function ReasonToString(ByVal Reason As EventReason) As String. That is defined "near" the class (ie in the same file?) but is not actually part of the class (ie. it is not a member function). In c++ I guess this would be a static function? I tried to just define it after the "end class", but it says "statement is not in a valid namespace". Any recommendations?
Public Sub sqlUpdate(ByVal table As String, ByVal column As String, ByVal var1 As String, ByVal column1 As String, ByVal var2 As String) Public CN As New MySqlConnection Public cmd As New MySqlCommand
[CODE]...
Which is fine, if I want to use mysql update all I have to do is call something like: sqlUpdate("test", "test", 0, "test", test) I was wondering if I could do the same with the SELECT statement and make a function. I cant think of a way to do it though...
sqlConnect() Dim cmd As New MySqlCommand With cmd .CommandText = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username=""" & lblAccountName.Text & """"
[CODE]...
The data I would want to extract would be different every time.
I've just been burned again by the fact that there is no compiler warning when you fail to return a result in a Function that returns a Value type. I wrote the function:
Public Function CompareTo(ByVal other As MessageIndex) As Integer Implements System.IComparable(Of MessageIndex).CompareTo Me._messageIndex.CompareTo(other._messageIndex) End Function
which performs the CompareTo Function for two integers, then throws the result away and returns 0, because I forgot to either assign a value to CompareTo, or use Return, and that isn't flagged by the compiler because it's valid VB for a Value type.
I happen never to use "FunctionName = ReturnValue" because it hides information from maintenance programmers and also because I think it's insane .
Is there any way I can get the compiler to issue a warning whenever my Functions are missing a Return, whether it's a Value type or not?
Is there a way to see exactly what the functions are doing. What i mean is there a way to see the class? I know what it does, i just want to know the code. For example the function: Membership.FindUsersByName()
I was convinced that If <expression> Then <statement [:statement]> Else [statements] in concrete form of If a = b Then SayHello() Else SayBye() End has sense. I read article on msdn on If-then-else, but I forgot why I was reading, so I concluded, that snippet above means this
If a = b Then HelloIsSaid : IsNotEnded Else ByeIsSaid : IsEnded But I have tested it now, and I see, that Else without statement is nothing more than decoration. It would be pretty good if it had function I described. Do you think its good request? Or do you know any circumstance where this Else has some function?
I want to put it (the select count statement) in this LINQ statement so I can get the sales count in my linq statement: Dim TheLeads = (From L In DB.Leads Where L.IsDeleted = False Select L).ToList() Is this possible to do in LINQ?
add an if statement and an exit statement to my do loop that exits when my future value (FV) is greater than 1000, then to change the exit statement to a continue statement so my loop will continue even though my fv is greater then 1000, point is to get this to run even though my if statement doesnt do anything. problem something wrong in my code and an exception error (xception of type 'System.OverflowException' occurred in mscorlib.dll)
so can someone show me where or why I have an error is, what am I overthinking now! I could use a hint, OMG i could use a tutor for that matter