i try to convert this kind of sql query into linq in visual basic, but i get stuck on how to make a percent.. I also don't know how to use linqpad for creating this linq
SELECT CASE RIGHT(PICName, 3)
WHEN '(P)' THEN 'Problem'
WHEN '(R)' THEN 'Request'
[Code].....
I have the following routine (that works) but which is messy to update owing to the hand-typed strings it uses:
Private Sub ListDefaults()
Dim conn As New SqlConnection( _
"server=bas047AUTODESKVAULT;Database=DWGDetails;Integrated Security=SSPI")
'Dim conn As New SqlConnection( _
[code]....
I have 2 Tables , OrderDetails and Requests In my LINQ to SQL dbml file. OrderDetailsID is a foreign key in Requests Table.
I want to write the query to get the sum of UnitCost from OrderDetails based on OrderId. And If there is a row in Requests Table for each OrderDetailsID, and the Requests.Last.RequestType="Refund" I want to reduce the total refund amount from the main sum otherwise If there is no row based on OrderDetailsID, add to sum.
Here is the way I implement that. I am looking to prevent using "For each".
iRefund = (From od1 In dc.OrderDetails _
Where od1.OrderID =1 _
Select od1.UnitCost).Sum
[Code]....
I've got a datacontext and created a binding source using LINQ to sql but cannot filter said bindingsource. The supportsfilter of the bindingsource is set to false ? why ? I can't find any info to say that I cannot filter a binding source based on a linq query.[code]
View 3 RepliesI have 2 Tables , OrderDetails and Requests In my LINQ to SQL dbml file.OrderDetailsID is a foreign key in Requests Table.I want to write the query to get the sum of UnitCost from OrderDetails based on OrderId.And If there is a row in Requests Table for each rderDetailsID, and the Requests.Last.RequestType="Refund" I want to reduce the total refund amount from the main sum otherwise If there is no row based on OrderDetailsID, add to sum
View 3 RepliesI have two module-level variables and Linq query. I want the results of the Let clause to change the global variables - is this possible?
For example:
Dim X As Integer = 0
Dim Y As Integer = 0
[code].....
I have the following LINQ-to-Entities query:[code]This will give me all the resident assignments for the current year/term. Then I have this LINQ-to-Entities query:[code]This will give me all the rooms. I want to iterate through the assignments and based on what room is assigned update the occupancy in reset_occupancy. I'm not 100% sure how to accomplish this. Here is my pseudo code of what I want to accomplish:[code]
View 1 RepliesI have the following LINQ-to-Entities query:
' Get all the residency assignments that match the term/year.
Dim assignments = From p In dbContext.Residents _
Where p.semester = term _
[code].....
I would like to bind a DataGridView to a different LINQ query every time (in order to reuse the same form/DGV for different queries), like this:
[Code]....
but the "Qry", and the number of comboboxes, and their field names would change every time.
I am trying to create a LINQ query statement that retrieve intersecting data from 3 datatables (dt, dt1, dt2). My first attempt to do so with the following LINQ query statement was successful: [code] However in my design, I would need the LINQ query statement to be dynamically generated, because I want a user to be able to retrieve intersecting data entries from VARIABLE number of datatables. In this case, the first option is not as good as the "INTERSECT" query operator, with which I can just easily connect each SQL query statement with a "INTERSECT" operator. The problem is that my second attempt using the "intersect" operator fails, and after many trials and errors I still can't get it to work. [code]
View 5 RepliesI know that LINQ queries are deferred and only executed when the query is enumerated, but I'm having trouble figuring out exactly when that happens.Certainly in a For Each loop, the query would be enumerated.What's the rule of thumb to follow? I don't want to accidentally enumerate over my query twice if it's a huge result.
For example, does System.Linq.Enumerable.First enumerate over the whole query? I ask for performance reasons. I want to pass a LINQ result set to an ASP.NET MVC view, and I also want to pass the First element separately. Enumerating over the results twice would be painful.It would be great to turn on some kind of flag that alerts me each time a LINQ query is enumerated. That way I could catch scenarios when I accidentally enumerate twice.
I have a table (Projects) which is linked to projectVersions on projectID..projectVersions contains several columns on which I'd like to filter a returned project (and associated projectVersions) list. For example there is a "capacity" column and a "country" column. I am doing a filtered list of projects on one page and I'd like to include all projects where any one of the associated projectVersions has a capacity of 750ml and a country of "France" for example.It may be that a particular parameter is not set and so I pass a zero to indicate not to filter on that.I guess this needs some kind of subquery as when I try and do something like this: [code] it doesn't work as the "xxx" bit, being one-to-many, expects me to specify an item to get at the entities within and yet I want to query where ANY of the associated versions match one of the criteria.
View 1 RepliesI have a data table that looks like this:
USERNAME ICOUNT IAVERAGE DATE_LOGGED
LAGX01 1245 1245 05-07-2012
LAGX02 2211 1422 05-07-2012
LAGX03 1698 1112 05-07-2012
LAGX04 4598 1555 05-07-2012
LAGX05 2589 3245 05-07-2012
LAGX06 3321 1155 05-07-2012
LAGX07 3698 3458 05-07-2012
LAGX08 2589 4587 05-07-2012
LAGX09 1598 1142 05-07-2012
LAGX10 3156 1987 05-07-2012
LAGX11 5547 2011 05-07-2012
LAGX12 9456 3459 05-07-2012
Now, I want to execute a sql query that will display the top 5 based on average, so i did this:
SELECT DISTINCT USERNAME,IAVERAGE FROM myTable WHERE IAVERAGE > 0 AND DATE_LOGGED='05-07-2012' ORDER BY IAVERAGE LIMIT 0,5 and the result is:
USERNAME ICOUNT IAVERAGE DATE_LOGGED
LAGX03 1698 1112 05-07-2012
LAGX09 1598 1142 05-07-2012
LAGX06 3321 1155 05-07-2012
LAGX01 1245 1245 05-07-2012
LAGX02 2211 1422 05-07-2012
Now, I want to numberize my query result, so it will look like this:
RANK USERNAME ICOUNT IAVERAGE DATE_LOGGED
1 LAGX03 1698 1112 05-07-2012
2 LAGX09 1598 1142 05-07-2012
3 LAGX06 3321 1155 05-07-2012
4 LAGX01 1245 1245 05-07-2012
5 LAGX02 2211 1422 05-07-2012
given this function:
Public Function Search(ByVal StartIndex As Integer, _
ByVal MaxResults As Integer, _
ByVal AccountNumber As String, _
ByVal LastName As String, _
[Code]....
instead of what I expected:
Select count(*) from remitline where lastname = "smith"
What am I doing wrong building up the where clause? I'm using Castle ActiveRecord 2.1
if there is that much of a performance gain in running a LINQ stored procedure versus a LINQ query?
View 1 RepliesI have to join two main tables, and I need to filter the results by elements in an ASP.NET web form. These filters are created on the fly so I have to use a lot of where extensions to filter the query. I want to execute the query with as optimized SQL as possible.
I am first doing a simple join between TW_Sites and TW_Investigators. Then there are two sub-tables that are involved. TW_InvestigatorToArea and TW_InvestigatorToDisease. While most of the where clauses are working fine, I have found a performance issue that won't be an issue right now, but will be an issue as the table gets bigger.
The arrays DiseaseCategories and DiseaseAreas would be the results of a CheckBoxList result.
Protected Sub LoadResults()
'Get Dictionary of Filters
Dim FilterDictionary As OrderedDictionary = Session.Item("InvestigatorFilterDictionary")
' Initialize LinqToSql
[code]....
Forgive my ignorance on this.I have this LINQ Query:Dim ngBikersDataContext As New CarBikeWalkDataContext
bikersList = (From c In ngBikersDataContext.Reg_Bikers _
Order By c.L_Name _
Select New Bikers() With { _
.BikerID = c.BikerID, _
.F_Name = c.F_Name, _
[Code]...
with the error "Overload resolution failed because no accesible 'Select' accepts this number of arguments."
Over the "NEW" I get an error " ')'expected."
We are doing a query against an in-memory collection of LINQ data objects. The wrinkle is that we are ordering by a column in a related table whose records have not necessarily been loaded yet (deferred loading:)
Dim oPkgProducts = _
From b In oBillPkg.BillProducts _
Where b.Successful.GetValueOrDefault(Common.X_INDETERMINATE) = _
[code]....
How do I add ROW_NUMBER to a LINQ query or Entity? How can I convert this solution to VB.NET?
[Code]...
I'm having trouble porting that last line. I have been unable to locate a VB.NET example. I'm actually not looking for any paging functionality like the example provides, just good old-fashioned Row_Number(Order By X) row index.
I was wandering is it possible to use a query within another query below is the code I am trying to use.
Public Function GetInventByComp(ByVal CompID As String) Using DC As New DataClassDataContext
'need to get company id's based off names? thats bad should be name from Id need to rethink this
Dim invent = (From C In DC.Inventors_Companies _
Where C.CompID = CompID _
Select C.InventorID).ToString
[Code]...
I was trying to us multiple values in a string like "1, 3, 5" but I can't seem to get that working either so I am trying to use just a single value now. Can anyone help me? "Yes I am new to this"
I am creating a project in VB.NET in which one of the reports require that the name of employees should be displayed as column names and whatever work they have done for a stated period should appear in rows below that particular column.Now as it is clear, the columns will have to be added at runtime. Am using an ODBC Data source to populate the grid. Also since a loop will have to be done to find out the work done by employees individually, so the number of rows under one column might be less or more than the rows in the next column.Is there a way to create an empty data table and then update its contents based on columns and not add data based on addition of new rows.
View 1 RepliesGiven the following XML, I would like to return all eventtitles where the eventtype id = 23. My current query only looks at the first eventtype, so returns the wrong result.
<event>
<eventtitle>Garrison Keillor</eventtitle>
<eventtypes>[code].....
i have a problem trying to query my database based on a value in a label. Here is the code for the query,
[Code]...
i need to update the table based on the two user.
for eg:
update table1 set rating=@rate where User1=@userid / user2=@userid
so i need to write a single query which satisfy the condition for both the users user1 and user2.if i pass the @userid ,if it matches the user's id it should update user1 record. if the id whcih i pass is user2's id then it should update the user2 rec.How to check for this condition in a single query...
I have a tableadapter where the select query is as follows:
I want to select only those rows where the value of orderno is in the TextBox1.text. How can i do this?
SELECT CustomerID, Orderno, CompanyName, ContactName, ContactTitle, Address, City, Region, PostalCode, Country, Phone, Fax
FROM Customers
I get the following string expression provided:"ChildObject.FullName" ...where ChildObject is an instance property on the MyObject1 type.ChildObject has a property named "FullName" and I want to sort a collection of type "MyObject1" based on this child properties "FullName" value.
I can do this all day long on properties directly on MyObject1 but I run into 2 challanges when doing it on a child instance and I can't get all the pieces working. The main 2 challanges are:
MyObject1 has a few different child property types so I can't hardcode the type for ChildObject. The string could be of any type.The sort expression is a String and not a known type.Above the value returned from the last line in the expression (if I run the code outsode the OrderBy method, does provide me the 'FullName' information I need. So the code must be close, but it still does not work.
Any ideas on how I can accomplish this? What I am trying to prevent is hardcoding a series of 'If' blocks on the child's type to then hardcode in its type to the sort or OrderBy method.
I have created a database that allows me to sort through the hundreds of pictures I have based on certain criteria. The file path for each picture is stored in a text box in the database (file path). I am currently using this code to copy the files to a new folder:
My.Computer.FileSystem.CopyFile(file_pathtextbox.text, �E:photo_gallary�)
However, this only copies the first file in my query not all the others. I am at a loss as how to loop through them all so they all end up in their new destination.
i am trying to insert/save the listview item/s on the database.what i am trying to do now is if the product is being entered/saved for the first time.the fcode should be 1, and increments after that.i have a combo box and a text box.the combo box items are from the database [ product table ]
let say user choose product 1
and the list view has 2 items [ a, b ]
and then save
the table would look like
fcode -- prod_id -- prod_name -- item
1 1 product 1 a
1 1 product 1 b[code]......
In my program I have a combo box that the user selects a date from and a list view that the user selects an employee ID from. How do I properly design my database query string to use both the date selected and the employee ID selected? The date is stored in a variable called YearMonth and the employee ID is stored in a variable called EmpID.
Here is what I am trying to do with my query:
Dim ExactQuery As String = _
"SELECT * " & _
"FROM[JobTypeExact_Query] WHERE (EMPID = ?) AND WHERE (YEARMONTH = YM)" 'Define Exact job type query
[code]....
I'm getting an error on my index simply setting a string field prior to using it and entering the loop. When I set this field within the loop I get a error still. how to go about Inserting records based upon a query in vb .net? The following is the code that I have:
Public Sub Insert_RunsizeUPCs()
Dim Command As SqlCommand
Dim adapter As New SqlDataAdapter
Dim dsin As New DataSet
[code]....